SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
#258324 - 02/27/09 09:54 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Anonymous
Unregistered


Arrangers akin to porn - what an absurd idea - except when I think about how much time I spend with my PSR2000......just her and I.

Top
#258325 - 02/27/09 10:16 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
vin5451 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/18/08
Posts: 115
Loc: Wellington, Fl USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Diki:
Seems like Yamaha is FAR ahead of Roland in this regard. The XS needs so little corrected for it's OS to be arranger capable, and then it's simply a case of newer arps (which could probably be imported fro the MIDI output of current arranger's patterns, Intro endings, fills, etc) to make it usable.

But without Music Finders, lyric displays and a revised system for accessing those styles (oops, arps!), they still have a ways to go to equal the shear user friendliness of the arranger.

But Yamaha have made a start... Roland, not so much


I agree with Diki here. Of the some what six thousand ARPs in the XS, about half of them are capable of recognizing chord changes. That's half the battle. I have a feeling that we're going to see something very soon which will incorporate both feature sets from Yamaha within the next couple of years.
_________________________
Vince Mistretta

Top
#258326 - 02/27/09 10:57 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by DanO1:
Many people probably do not know that Ketron supplied many of the styles for Lowrey...


Ha! I'm not surprised Ketron keep that quiet!

Top
#258327 - 02/27/09 12:01 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14268
Loc: NW Florida
Hey, it's not like I WANT to see the arranger die out!

I just call it the way I see it...

Nobody wanted to see the organ die off, but economics, technology and changing music tastes made it happen. None of those processes have stopped, IMO

How many arranger manufacturers have gone under in the last ten or fifteen years? Not exactly the sign of a healthy market segment. If Technics, Solton, GEM and others can no longer make it, if Wersi and some others are hanging on by their fingernails, surely it's not doom and gloom to see a trend? I'm not talking about next year, maybe not the next ten years (although that's close to the figure I expect), but it is happening. Look at the age average on this forum.

None of us getting any younger!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
#258328 - 02/27/09 10:27 PM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Bachus Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
Overhere in europe Keyboards still sell a lot better then full blown synthesizers..

All of these assumptions are based on the US market. which is a niche market for arrangers and currently of no relevance at all.

This allready starts out with the current salesmen in your local music shop.
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Roland Jupiter 80, Ipad pro.

http://keyszone.boards.net

Top
#258329 - 02/28/09 12:49 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
spalding Offline
Member

Registered: 09/29/04
Posts: 582
Loc: Birmingham
No they are not heading for the refuse heap but they are changing into more workstation type products or workstations will take on more and more arranger functions.

Top
#258330 - 02/28/09 06:18 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
DanO1 Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/31/01
Posts: 3602
Loc: Maryland
Quote:
Originally posted by Diki:
Hey, it's not like I WANT to see the arranger die out!

I just call it the way I see it...


How many arranger manufacturers have gone under in the last ten or fifteen years? Not exactly the sign of a healthy market segment. If Technics, Solton, GEM and others can no longer make it, if Wersi and some others are hanging on by their fingernails, surely it's not doom and gloom to see a trend? I'm not talking about next year, maybe not the next ten years (although that's close to the figure I expect), but it is happening. Look at the age average on this forum.

None of us getting any younger!


My understanding is that Solton is strictly a Brand.. it was never a manufacturer . The name was used to brand Ketron products in the USA & than became the brand name for GEM ..
_________________________
dansmusicgear@aol.com
https://www.reverbnation.com/danoneil?profile_view_source=profile_box

Top
#258331 - 02/28/09 06:24 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Dnj Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
I'm glad Yamaha is Strong & Striving they must be doing something right

Top
#258332 - 02/28/09 06:55 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
mc Offline
Member

Registered: 07/17/01
Posts: 870
Loc: New York
Quote:
Originally posted by DanO1:
My understanding is that Solton is strictly a Brand.. it was never a manufacturer . The name was used to brand Ketron products in the USA & than became the brand name for GEM ..



Solton was or is a distributor company. . Ketron used their name since it was already popular in Europe. When Solton put their name on Ketron’s keyboards it always also said by “Ketron Labs”.
_________________________
Ketron X1 (Oldie but Goodie)

Top
#258333 - 02/28/09 11:02 AM Re: Are Arrangers really headed for the refuse heap?
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14268
Loc: NW Florida
As robust (comparatively) as arranger sales are in Europe and elsewhere, it failed to stop these manufacturers from going out of business. I really AM trying to take the big picture into account...

From what I have read, it is beginning to be harder over there to find some of the TOTL arrangers, especially Roland and Ketron (and to a degree, Korg) in regular stores that USED to stock them ten, fifteen years ago. The trend may be slower, but seems to still be happening. Europe is still the heartland of home organ music too, but that hasn't equated to a robust industry, at least by sixties and seventies standards.

Those that chose the home organ route haven't been in sufficient numbers to stop it still being boutique manufacturers at boutique prices. Hopefully, I am dead wrong. But until I see that true arranger/WS hybrid (labeling the case 'WS' doesn't make any of our modern arrangers one in fact ) I still worry...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
Page 3 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online