|
|
|
|
|
|
#266800 - 06/29/09 06:28 PM
Re: Question about Audya
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/08/00
Posts: 4715
Loc: West Virginia
|
I can understand fixing a bug here.., adding new feature there.., but the 16trk seq being scheduled to be added via an OS upgrade. Adding the seq via an upgrade..., well is a little ass-backwards isn't it? I still agree with many in that the Audya does sound amazing.., but some basics should have never been left off.., and adding a seq of all things shouldn't be reserved for an OS upgrade. It should SHIP with that feature already active and fully operational.
_________________________
GEAR: Yamaha MOXF-6, Casio MZX-500, Roland Juno-Di, M-Audio Venom, Roland RS-70, Yamaha PSR S700, M-Audio Axiom Pro-61 (Midi Controller). SOFTWARE: Mixcraft-7, PowerTracks Pro Audio 2013, Beat Thang Virtual, Dimension Le.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266801 - 06/29/09 06:43 PM
Re: Question about Audya
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Several people have excused the Audya's slow OS development by bringing up the G70's two major OS overhauls. What most people fail to realize is that NONE of the new features added in OS2 & 3 were features that had been initially promised, and then failed to deliver at launch. Out of the gate, the G70 had fully functional editing (in fact, they were so good they never did improve them!), sequencing and arranger control. All the new features were things that only ADDED to the OS, not filled in holes already existing. Per part EQ wasn't in the initial release, nor did anyone expect it. The OTS system functioned well, but Roland found a way to make it even better. Guitar Mode was not even in anyone's mind until Roland delivered it. For FREE... All too much of the Audya's OS development seems merely a late to the prom effort to deliver features promised well before launch, as well as the usual bugfixes. Primary features (the sampler, the style editors etc.) have STILL yet to appear, and we are already at OS2 I'm afraid you will have to find something other than the G70, to excuse this post-launch scrambling to finish the Audya...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266804 - 06/30/09 08:03 PM
Re: Question about Audya
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 3305
Loc: Reseda, California USA
|
Ketron, in my opinion, has never had a first class sequencer for recording songs in any keyboard I've sold since the MS50 years. I've never understood this. I've asked the folks from Ketron Italy and AJ to design a good working one but I've never seen it. Maybe they think everyone should use a computer to record keyboard tracks. The Audya has a simple hit record and play whatever you can on the keyboard and it will record it. Styles, sounds, variations and anything else you press will record and when it's over, play it back. This is the same as the XD9 series. The SD1 has a 16 track sequencer mode but honestly, I could never figure out how to use it. I've been used to recording on Yamaha, Korg and Roland sequencers which are all easier to use in my opinion. As to the sounds and styles of the Audya, I for one think they are great and I've had a chance to play one now for a few weeks. It's my favorite right now for the sounds and styles. ------------------ George Kaye Kaye's Music Scene Reseda, California 818-881-5566 www.kayesmusicscene.com
_________________________
George Kaye Kaye's Music Scene (Closed after 51 years) West Hills, California (Retired 2021)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|