hi Don, the Midjay does not have a sequencer....the only Ketron module that does,is the X4 , which I am having an hard time hunting down

I am very happy with my Genesys XP, but I want to try them all as one of them is going to be my main composing tool

While moving away from a computer for live use is a legitimate need, as simple and stable as the needs for a MIDI sequencer are, why hobble your choices for a playback device by insisting it has a full sequencer on board? As long as it has SMF playback (and Markers would be nice!), trust me, there is NO onboard MIDI sequencer in any keyboard or module with a fraction of the power of a good sequencer like Cubase.

I would advise you do your sequencing on the computer still, then export the SMF to the module for playback. Trying to edit in detail, while staring at your composition through a tiny, non-graphical LCD screen is SUCH a return to the eighties! As long as you aren't taxing your computer with multiple VSTi's, and power hungry plug-ins, and multiple takes of audio, most computers will run a DAW if you use it just for MIDI with little hassle and instability. IMO, WAY less hassle than trying to do sequence work with such a tiny display and few editing options...

Sure, gig with the module, but compose with the computer...

Diki,yes I tried all you mentioned. I don't want a computer for -composing- music with because in -theory- it's the most powerful thing for music on Earth,but in -practice- it causes me very valuable loss of time and energy,all things that I can invest into the MUSIC.

Editing a midi recording on a good hardware sequencer is MUCH easier and immediate than on the computer. Just press a pedal to punch in,and release to punch out. Can it be easier and faster than that? I don't need to edit a single note,if I make a mistake I record again the whole phrase,it's only a couple of bars. If I can't play the part well,I practice first. At least I have a reason to waste my time practicing more and becoming a better musician,than wasting it away in frustration because the PC is always coming up with crazy problems.I can record the part at a lower speed to be as accurate as possible,then I just change the speed in the master track.

There are ways around the apparent limitations of the hardware. These limitations are so bad only because they are perceived like that,etc...

I used to make more music with a Kurzweil K2000 than with all the computer stuff....the PC is great,but it takes TONS of time that I am not prepared to spend anymore on it.

I am not throwing it away,but I want to change my approach. When it's time to study or write music,I don't want to frustrate myself anymore.

Besides,hardware arrangers still sound the best. I have used Band in a Box and all the rest,but it still does not sound nearly as good as the hardware. Simple facts. I have tried Bandstand, Soundfonts,this and that...

I have Goliath,which has an huge GM library. But try to set it for midi? It's nuts. I have spent hours and the fact is that is not GM compatible. You have to manually set each track for each sound. I just can't be bothered with that stuff anymore....too long winded,too complicated,and too many problems.



[This message has been edited by arranger_yes_pc_no (edited 07-28-2009).]

I posted the same thing twice by mistake

[This message has been edited by arranger_yes_pc_no (edited 07-28-2009).]

I wasn't really referring to using VSTi's, I know all too well how frustrating all that stuff can get. But to make a sequence for a simple MIDI module, you don't have any of those issues, a mere MIDI interface is all you need. As for having to punch in a whole phrase to fix one note, I'm afraid that seems like a lot of work for a simple problem...

Perhaps the problem was WHICH MIDI sequencer program you used in the past? Personally, I haven't YET found anything as powerful, yet intuitive as Cubase. Forget all the audio and VSTi stuff. That is the cause of most instability anyway. Just use it for MIDI, and you are good to go. But when it comes time to quickly rearrange sections of a song (to try out different structures), when it comes time to say 'I'd like all the backbeats of the drum part under 64 velocity to be a bit louder' , when it comes time to say 'I'd like to quantize ONLY the backbeats and leave the ghosting untouched on the snare' or a myriad of detail editing that is a total PITA with a hardware sequencer, the computer sequencer rules, IMO...

I simply find the visuality of the thing (being able to SEE what you are doing) a major timesaver. Perhaps you could find a friend using Cubase, and see if it makes your old sequencer look clunky... But, trust me, forget about using VSTi's and audio, and you will have a pretty stable DAW...

I used to use built-ins for years, but the minute I got my first Atari and the early Cubase, I have never looked back. I can work ten times as fast as a built in, and to a higher level. I know your experience has been different, but maybe you just had the wrong software?