Originally posted by Nigel:
It simply seems easier to get a good balanced sound out of a Bose system. Dunno why but it seems to be the case.
Well actually I do know why this is the case but it can be a two edged sword. It is simply because the Bose design using an array of small speakers removes some critical midrange EQ decisions that can make for a good or a bad sound. The small speakers just don't produce a lot of those midrange frequencies. If there were some 10 or 12 inch speakers or midrange horns in the system then that probably wouldn't be the case. The downside is that it really isn't possible to reproduce those frequencies when desired so some instruments in that part of the sound spectrum will always remain more buried than they would on a conventional sound system. The upside that makes the Bose attractive to OMB or bands without a sound man is that overall the sound always is comfortable to listen to in almost any room without any special setup. Conventional systems can sound radically different when set up in different spaces, particularly in regard to midrange and do require careful attention to EQ. But I do agree with Diki that a conventional system can certainly be setup to sound good as well but it does require a lot more setup work when you move from room to room.
The Bose design removes both the EQ control and potential problems associated with having that control. So while a dedicated sound man would feel constrained using a Bose system those without a sound man appreciate the set and forget nature of the system. Like everything in life it is a trade off and the decision is more about what gives you the results you need and minimizes problems.
[This message has been edited by Nigel (edited 08-01-2009).]