|
|
|
|
|
|
#270017 - 08/25/09 09:07 PM
Goodbye T3 - hello Pa800
|
Member
Registered: 06/10/00
Posts: 624
Loc: Allentown, PA, USA
|
I'm not sure if it was a smart move...not yet. I've been a yamaha user for so long it's a bit difficult to move on to Korg. There's a lot to like about the Pa800. The OS is not one of them. However once you get used to it, it's not that bad- just different. Korg styles vary in quality. They really shine in the ac. guitar - driven styles and a lot of the jazz styles are very good. Same goes for voices. Trumpets, brass, trombones, drums, guitars, strings, and synths are outstanding. Flutes and saxes are unacceptable to my ear. Oh how I long for that Yamaha Sweet Soprano sax. Korg really missed the mark in the sax dept. So I was assuming that the DNC voices on the 800 would well outdo those on the 500, but basicallywhat they are is just same voices on which some are given special controls for more expression, but as far as I can tell, those bad saxes are just as bad - only with more expression/control. It's too bad because there are other features that are better than Yamaha...it seems the style loops are longer and contain more variety - plus they're not drowning in reverb- more in your face and live- feeling. Just about everything is customizable on the Pa800 - AND upgrades, voices, and styles are free. I'm considering taking the 800 back and trading it in for a 500, which is over $1,000 less and has the same engine as the 800 minus some features that are not that impotant to me. I look at the 500 as the "bang for your buck" version just as the S900 or now S910 is on the Yamaha side. I'll most likely end up with the korg Pa500 and Yamaha s910 when all the dust settles- two very excellent keyboards each with outstanding quality yet very different and complimentary. Maybe - just maybe I can then settle in for a while and work on that recording project I've been wanting to do- at least until the bug bites again. Thanks for reading my self-talk. It helped me, anyway. Tim
_________________________
Tim Schaeffer
----------------------------------------------------------- YAMAHA CVP-509 / Korg Pa300
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#270027 - 08/26/09 03:06 PM
Re: Goodbye T3 - hello Pa800
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
I think there's one MAJOR reason to go 800 over the 500, and that IS those DNC capabilities. Notice I didn't say VOICES, as, as you noted, most of them at the moment are simply re-programmed old voices. BUT... Korg are sure to be working feverishly on new samples to leverage this technology, with a new arranger in the works. And one thing you can be sure of is that Korg will release these for their existing PA2/PA800 customers to load up into them, probably at no cost at all, or DEFINITELY much less than Yamaha are charging for a paltry ONE SA2 sound from their expansion library... DNC, like SA2, really only shines when samples are specifically recorded for it, but it was released (for free!) halfway through the PA2/800's production cycle. So it needs a whole new set of samples to sound its' best. I believe those are coming... And I believe that people like James (Irishacts) will be developing third party DNC sounds, something that Yamaha will never allow (their proprietary sample format is already an obstacle to getting the range of normal sample sets other keyboards enjoy, and SA2 cannot be edited). Yes, now, there's not that much to get excited about with the DNC sounds (though they ARE an improvement), but improvement IS coming, and it will be likely to cost you a LOT less than Yamaha's expansion packs are costing THEIR customers If I had to get a Korg right now, and couldn't afford the PA2, the only other one I would get would be the PA800. Future-proof yourself, my friend....
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#270035 - 08/27/09 09:56 AM
Re: Goodbye T3 - hello Pa800
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hi Tim, As you know I recently purchased a Korg Pa588. I considered the Pa2X Pro or even the Pa800 but I just didn't want to compromise by not having a full 88 note weighted action. I already have a good 61 note arranger that I have used several times but couldn't stand playing the non-weighted action at least when playing legit piano pieces. As for playing other sounds like organ of solo instruments i.e. trumpet, flute, etc. I don't find the weighted action to be a hindrance at all but maybe that's because I am used to weighted actions. Regarding the additional features of the Pa2X/800; You have to ask yourself what you really need. I don't care about sampling, the factory presets are plenty good and the synth engine is very powerful in the way of editing/creating new sounds using the vast assortment of waveforms included in ROM. I suppose if there was some specific waveforms you needed that weren't already in ROM, then the ability to sample would be useful, but for those with programming chops, there is a lot of potential for creating what you need right inside the instrument. I do kind of miss having a harmonizer or at least a mic input with effects, although my amp has a mic input with a good assortment of digital effects so not a big deal. The one thing that I would kind of like to have is the ability to record/playback audio files. But since I have an M-Audio MicroTrack it isn't any trouble to record the audio into that and then transfer it to my PC to burn to CD or whatever. And for audio playback, it is easy to connect my iPod to the audio inputs of the Pa588 for break music or to play along with mp3 files. So the lack of the ability built into the Pa588 still is not that big of a deal. The other thing that would be nice is to have more than one assignable pedal input for fills, selecting variations, etc. But There are a number of MIDI footswitches available that can do the job via MIDI program changes on the Control Channel. Then again, I kick pedals for bass most of the time so my left foot is already busy holding down the bass and my right foot is normally on the sustain pedal. The button layout for fills and variations are smartly located so triggering these by hand isn't cumbersome anyway. So again, not a big deal. What is a big deal is how good this instrument sounds, how easy it is to operate and how versatile it is. All this talk of DNC sounds, SA2 sounds, etc. personally I just don't see that as all that important. I mean the sounds as they exist in the Pa588 are very good and playable the way they are. The trick is to play the selected sound in the style of the real instrument. It always kills me when I hear someone using a monophonic instrument like sax or trumpet or whatever play chords; it immediately takes away any realism that otherwise might exist. Or playing an organ or guitar sound while using the sustain pedal. Having the extra velocity samples, or fancy algorithms to automatically select from an assortment or articulation waveforms is cool, but if the player doesn't impart the playing technique of the actual instrument, the extra stuff is worthless. Enough of my 2 cents. Best Regards, Dave ------------------ Wm. David McMahan LearnMyKeyboard JazzItUp Band The Modulators [This message has been edited by WDMcM (edited 08-27-2009).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|