|
|
|
|
|
|
#272121 - 09/27/09 03:20 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
That's all well and good, Mac, but it doesn't explain the noticeable lack of low mids. Bose are anything BUT flat. That's not necessarily a BAD thing, it's those frequencies that are the hardest to dial in just right in a room. Bose takes them pretty much out of the picture. There's an interesting comment on the Bag Sub page: Sometimes the frequency range of the BagAmp is not deep enough, and you need stronger bass response. Keyboards, drums, bass guitar, soundtracks, DJ material, backing tracks can all contain demanding low frequency sound that requires a powerful low bass reproduction system.I would have though that list pretty much covers EVERYTHING, so it basically means you HAVE to get the sub, too! Unless you are an acoustic guitarist that LIKES having no 'thump' or 'knock' when he needs it
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272122 - 09/27/09 09:27 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
I only know a couple performers that use the Fishman Solo Amp system, and both sold them after a week or use. To my aging ears they tended to sound a bit distorted, particularly at moderately high levels, and they lacked the crisp highs and excellent lows provided by the Bose L1 and L1 Compact. I personally never seem to have a problem dialing in the mid range sounds with the L1 or L1 Compact, but maybe this has something to do with the venue configurations where I perform. With the standard L1 those frequencies were set with both the Remote and the system presets. With the Compact, however, all settings are made at the keyboard, which took a few days to set up, but now that all the EQs have been saved to system memory slots, they can be instantly recalled and locked in place for the entire performance. If changes are warranted during the performance it's just a couple button pushes to select another set of EQs and the problem's solved. You'll find a lot of this information on the Bose forum. Good Luck, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272124 - 09/27/09 12:03 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/03
Posts: 3748
Loc: Motown
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272127 - 10/15/09 01:32 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Member
Registered: 12/16/99
Posts: 140
Loc: Brooklyn NY
|
OK So I tried out the Fishman SoloAmp today, as well as the RCF ART710A and 712A. The RCFs sound very good. The 10 inch has amazing bass for a 10 inch speaker. It has very clear and crisp highs. Over all, I’m very impressed with the art710's sound. It’s also very light at just 25 pounds. The only drawback I found was that is doesn't have any side handles, only one handle on top. That's not so terrible since its only 25 pounds, but a side handle would be good.
The RCF 12 inch ART712A Has bigger and more powerful base than the 10 inch, of course, gut only a little. However, the 12 inch sounded a little more muddy and muffled. I don't know how much it weighs, but I lifted it and it seemed pretty light.
The Fishman SoloAmp has a good sound, but when you turn it up, the sound quality really goes down. I was amazed at the base coming from those small speakers - truly magic! But... the base is uneven. Weighs 25 pounds and seems easy to carry, since it is thin and long. I tried walking around the room to hear sound dispersion. It was fairly even, but it was a pretty small room.
Over all, I think that I would get the 10 inch RCF ART710A. Did anyone compare it to the ART310A?
[This message has been edited by Jick Duck (edited 10-15-2009).]
_________________________
Jick
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272129 - 10/15/09 08:39 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Jick Duck, Glad you had the opportunity to try them in person, however, I wish you would have used them in a large room. In the smaller settings the system is not too bad, but the sound quality tends to deteriorate significantly in the larger venues. Good Luck, and thanks for the update. Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272131 - 10/15/09 11:47 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 1002
Loc: Phila. 'burbs, Pa. USA
|
Well, it looks like this Sunday will be my last gig with the L1, B1's. I was holding off selling the big system until I felt comfortable about using 2 compacts with probably a Thumper for larger and outdoor venues. I have a buyer that wanted the L1 and 2 B1's today, he had the cash and wanted to pick up the equipment for use this weekend. But, I have a gig Sunday in a 500+ seat room - 350 expected to attend. I didn't think the 1 compact could fill the room, and I want to get some more info on the Thumper. I'm looking to replace the L1, 2B1's with 2 compacts and a Thumper or something on that order. Gary, Don, Donny et al, do you think that's a comparable exchange? Love the big Bose, but these old bones are talking to me ... the compact(s) make life easier. Ciao, Jerry
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272132 - 10/15/09 11:54 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
Jerry, I'm fairly confident that with a pair of compacts, audiences to 350 would not be a problem. If you added a Thumper, or a powered sub of any kind, in all likelihood you would have more bottom end than you need and loads of headroom. Good Luck, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272137 - 10/15/09 05:23 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Originally posted by Dnj: how would you know by Gary's statement what type of music or venue he plays? But that's my entire POINT, Donny. When making equipment recommendations, what and where YOU play has no bearing on anyone else when it comes to adequate volume for larger gigs. If you don't play the same stuff as Gary, at the same volume, his recommendation is of little worth. Rather than specify the number of people, specify how close to maximum you can push the gear before it gets noticeably worse, specify if you are playing disco, hiphop or rock to a crowd of under 30 year olds (who are DEFINITELY not "sick of getting blown out every time they go to an affair" ), specify whether they were satisfied with the level (perhaps compare to their usual volume)... The only thing my crystal balls tell me is that not all of us do the same things to the same people, so expecting the same gear to work is unlikely. "I played to 100 people yesterday' means nothing. Use YOUR crystal ball, Donny Infer from THAT how loud I played... You can't..! You can only 'guess'. And if guessing is good enough to base a $2000 PA purchase on, then have at it!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272139 - 10/15/09 06:14 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Still obsessing about my balls..? Got two arrangers (say a nice E80 or Audya ), in case you have someone to help you move it? Didn't think so... The number of players on this forum that WANT to own and carry two PA's, just in case, is probably tiny. Most of us want ONE that covers all our needs. Oh, and, BTW... ever heard of the VOLUME knob (main fader if you want to get technical)? It's what most people use to not blast out the audience when they use a PA maybe a bit bigger than they need for that gig! If some people are blasting out their audiences, it's because they are NOT using that, got NOTHING to do with the size of their PA... Got more to do with the size (or lack thereof!) of their brains... So, you are basically saying that, as long as you have a BIG PA for when you need it, the Compacts are the perfect secondary PA for smaller engagements? Because, I don't hear ANYONE ever asking that particular question. And quantifying the point at which the bigger PA becomes necessary is the six million dollar question (as yet, unanswered), isn't it? For me, what's relevant is, two Compacts = @300W = $2000 One L1/B1 = 750W = @$2000 If you EVER play higher volume gigs, seems like, for the same money, an L1 gets you into the game, at the price of losing stereo. Unless, of course, you can afford (or even WANT) to carry two separate PA's...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272141 - 10/15/09 07:36 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Originally posted by Dnj: People are happy with the BC sound, end of story I'd say. SOME people are happy with the Bose sound... I seem to remember YOU being not exactly in love with the L1 (and I don't recall you being content with 'people are happy with the L1' as a rebuttal to your experience, either )... I play through an L1 rig from time to time. Not going to buy one. Doesn't mean I won't recommend it if I think the buyer needs it for what it does best (but I'm sure going to try and find out what he DOES need first). Strange how, when SOME people don't like a piece of gear, it's OK to criticize it, but when they change their mind (or, actually, get something different from the same manufacturer), all of a sudden it's 'don't do as I DID, do as I DO' All we can EVER do here is say 'It works for ME'... But for this to be of any real general value, specifying how one actually uses something in detail makes it more than simply anecdotal. And, I'm afraid, simply specifying how many people we are playing for is of not much value. I can't tell how loud YOU will be playing for 100 people, you can't tell me how loud I would be, no-one can tell how loud Gary is either. Some other way of describing this is needed, IMO. Maybe 'I had such and such a PA before. Ran it at 75%. This is MUCH louder/quieter/more distorted/cleaner etc. than the old system' would actually help...? Zuki got all this started by being unsatisfied with the one Compact at higher volume when he was ecstatic at lower volumes. All I am trying to do is pin down WHAT that level is, to better help those asking themselves the same question... Anything wrong in that?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272142 - 10/15/09 08:51 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
WOW! Just got home, fired up the PC to check my Email, then clicked on the zone. I see you guys are still at it. OK, I tried to reconcile this with some science tonight, however, I had a problem. I had not used my old DB meter in probably 5 years, and I forgot to take out the batteries--BIG MISTAKE. That $150 DB meter is now a gooey, white mess inside and well beyond repair. I hope to borrow one from a friend who owns a local music store, or maybe one from another friend who is a state trooper. Yes, a state trooper--they have noise pollution laws here and they are enforced. At any rate, I don't think any of this will help our friend make a decision about which system to buy, and I DO NOT KNOW what kind of music he performs/plays. I seriously doubt that anyone on this forum plays head-banging rock, but I could be wrong. If there are some I would like them to identify themselves so I can tell them the Bose L1 and L1 Compact is not the system for them. The Bose does not provide a huge falloff in volume, it does not provide the distortion some folks are used to hearing, and it is not in stereo. It is probably as loud as any system you'll ever use, and that volume level is spread fairly evenly throughout the venue. It provides clear, crisp, clean sounds throughout the human hearing range, even when pushed to higher levels. Now, for those who tried the Bose L1 and L1 Compact, DIDN'T like them, or they DID NOT fulfill your needs, raise your hands! Hmmm. For some reason I don't seem to see more than a couple--must be something in the computer, How about those that sent them back for a refund? OK. Now lets see a show of hands from those that use them every day (or night), love what they hear, have great audience responses and DO NOT think this was too much to pay for this fantastic system? Now that's what I'm talking about! Now, I don't perform for young people, that is, those ranging from 21 to 30 years of age. And, I don't go where they go, do what they do, and enjoy the kind of music Diki described. However, I suspect that if you put 350 of them in a room, turned the PA volume up to 120-DB (same as a jet engine), six drunken girls would get off their bar stools and shake some body parts. This would attract six drunken guys, who would stumble onto the dance floor, two of which would pick a fight, two others would begin throwing up, and the other two would steal their beer while the fight ensued. At this point the DJ/KJ/band would crank up the volume until the speakers distorted all to hell. I guess someone may think this is fun and entertaining--just not the folks I know. That's what's nice about getting older. I sometimes perform for fairly large audiences that range in age from 45 to 65, conventions, corporate parties, major fishing tournaments, jobs that sometimes have audience sizes ranging from 300 to more than 500 people. Most do not dance, but a fair proportion of them will get out on the dance floor. At the end of the night, a significant number of individuals will come to you and tell you how much they enjoyed the music, and some ask when you'll be returning. Ironically, since I began using the Bose systems there has been one comment that always sticks in my mind: "We really loved your voice and the songs you sang. Your voice was so clear I could understand every word you sang, even though we were in the back of the room." My voice hasn't changed in years, and I never had someone make that comment when I used a conventional sound system. So, when I get the opportunity to measure the actual DB level at a half-dozen venues, I'll post the information. From past experience, though, I suspect that the level I perform at probably falls in the 65 to 75-DB range. This is just an educated guess at this point. Now, could I crank the Bose L1 Compact up to 120-DB? I don't know. Would I want to? NAH! That's kids stuff. Cheers, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272143 - 10/15/09 11:04 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/23/05
Posts: 1002
Loc: Phila. 'burbs, Pa. USA
|
Wow! Just home from my restaurant gig ... Like most folks here, I play a variety of venues. I'm in my 10th year at a 120 seat restaurant, I do several Italian outdoor festivals a year, as well as several weddings a year about half outdoors - tents and all that. Frequently for weddings, I do the ceremony, cocktail hour, dinner music then do a combo of live and DJ for the reception. About 5 times a year I do an oldies dance gig, country club dinner dance etc. Then there is the occasional house party or office luncheon gig. So, Most of the time, the compact is adequate and other times, I may need a 'thump'. I do this for a living so I want to use the best tools for the job. I'm fortunate in that I can justify the investment for good equipment. I've owned many sound systems over the years and I think that the Bose systems have a great sound quality-wise compared most of the systems I have heard. At this point in my life, I'm trying to make hauling this stuff easier and Bose does that too. Those years of carrying that Leslie piece of furniture (God bless Dave McMahon - still hauling one) and those Ampeg quad 12's have taken a toll. Sorry to ramble on so - some of the restaurant patrons provide me with some great wine ... Ciao, Jerry
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272146 - 10/16/09 08:58 AM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Member
Registered: 11/04/03
Posts: 541
Loc: Australia
|
Well we play everything from Jazz to Head Banging Rock, and most stops in between (let's say the exception is Metal and all it's Sub Genres - and I do make a distinction between Metal and Head Banging Rock) to audiences of ALL ages including older clientele venues, Young Club Venues, Mixed Party Corporates, Small, Medium, Large etc etc etc etc etc and, seriously - ETC(!)
The L1 Model II with 2 Subs (and for a few, really big gigs, a Packlite) does - no, MORE than does - the job.
If we really had problems with this system, I would honestly, hand on my heart, tell you guys.
Maybe the only problem The Bose Systems have, as we've all discussed previously, is the far reaching, room filling sound. When we get those problems, we simply turn down.
But then I (and others) have said all this before haven't we?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272149 - 10/16/09 08:42 PM
Re: alternative to BOSE compact
|
Member
Registered: 11/04/03
Posts: 541
Loc: Australia
|
Originally posted by Diki: All I've been trying to do is get an objective description of the difference in volume between running a Compact and running something (L1 included) that works for larger venues and louder crowds. And the replies I get lump them all in together. You guys love to read between the lines... (or love to post without actually reading the whole thread!)
Fair question Diki, but I already HAVE answered it (or began to answer it before I was prematurely and irrationally jumped upon by Hammer) in a previous thread - which maybe you didn't read all of When you go to the Bose forum, you have many members citing the differences between the L1 Compact and Big Brother L1 Model 1 & 2. (if you want, I'll do a search and a read and provide you with links) What I was starting to talk about a few months ago when everyone was just beginning to 'try 'n buy' the Compacts, was the difference in number of Speakers and Volume, and more to the point, the fact that the Sub in the Compact only goes down to around 65 Hz whereas the Sub(s) in the L1 Model 1 & 2 goes down to 40 Hz - which I think is enough, as anything below 40Hz really is almost literally pure rumble 'n noise, not particularly useful - even for Hip Hop (which we play a fair bit of) and at the time I noted that the Compact was fine 'n dandy for the kind of Nursing Home/Easy Listening Venues & material the majority of SynthZoners play, but would struggle in larger venues, with more "full on" Material. For more than that (The large venues we often play - 200 to 500 ppl plus) the L1 is, IMHO a necessity for that kind of scale, and for more modern (Top 40) material. I wish I could give you more of a detailed idea of room size that we play, but I wouldn't be able to provide accurate enough measurements and layouts, just guesswork. Also I have to point out that my opinion of the Compact is also, just guesswork, which probably negates my opinion of the Compact for many people - and hey, maybe it should..... [This message has been edited by hellboy44 (edited 10-16-2009).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|