Originally posted by Stephenm52:
Larry, Cool stuff! The Zoom does a nice job as well. You certainly maintained your cool and patience defusing that situation with the cell phone user as well. I enjoyed you're "Nobody Till Somebody Loves You"
I was surprised when I opened up the box containing my Zoom Q3. On the lid it said, "A little bit of video, a lot of audio." I thought, "Why not a lot of video and a lot of audio?"
I know that they can't put a lot of controls on an inexpensive device. I don't want more controls. I just want a decent video camera.
Basically, in good lighting, the Zoom Q3 takes decent video. In low light conditions, the results absolutely suck.
I have heard similar complaints on the web. I wouldn't be surprised if Zoom comes out with a more expensive camera that has HD and is able to adapt to low light. When it comes out, I will buy it.
There is another option. The Kodak Zi8 is also a cheapy and reportedly takes better video and has a mic input. Nevertheless, it's preferable to have an all in one unit which is why the Q3 was such a fantastic idea in concept. Yet because of the inconsistent video quality, I don't think it will catch on as quickly as it might have if Zoom hadn't sacrificed to such a great degree video quality for price point.
I don't want to completely slam the Q3, I mean the videos I have on Youtube are decent. But I've had to toss several hours of video that were made in dimmer rooms, and I can't seem to save them with software either.
Beakybird