|
|
|
|
|
|
#280793 - 02/04/10 03:14 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Well, we ALL know you aren't going to get one, so is this question academic, or just curiosity? You KNOW it won't have USB3, 1TB HD, 2GB RAM, all the other things that no keyboard in the WORLD has, yet, and it won't be much cheaper (if any) than the current Audya is. So, you'll still sit on the sidelines and bitch... Personally, if an Audya was in my future, it would be the 76 version. The module worries me (I'd love to add one to my G70) because Ketron's MIDI implementation on the Audya looks barebones at best. They would have to SERIOUSLY beef up that section before it would be practical, IMO. But I am content with USB1, let alone USB3, won't use the sampler live much (and prefer VSTi samplers and my Kurzweil in the studio), so won't need 2GB sample RAM (which, even at the Audya's pretty decent load up speed, would take a month of Sunday's to fill ), and realize that, in practical terms, a 1TB HD would remain mostly empty even with ALL the real world sounds I'd ever need on board, I am STILL far more concerned that, if I played a Gsus7 chord, my audio guitarist would PLAY a Gsus7 chord, not some MIDI stand-in... So, in fairness, I am not so much waiting for a 61 or a module of the Audya... I am waiting for a TRUE Audya2 with the horsepower and capabilities to do what we all wanted it to do (musically) in the first place.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280802 - 02/05/10 08:06 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280804 - 02/05/10 01:34 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Secure delivery.... Without that, some form of copy protection, who on earth is going to develop styles for the Audya, with its' vastly more complicated audio loops to have to record? They sell ONE copy, we all trade it around like bubblegum cards, how does he get PAYED? But if it had secure delivery and copy protection, they wouldn't have to charge much, because EVERYONE with an Audya would be paying him (if the styles were any good, that is!) rather than just the first few, as it now stands. See the thread about the Korg Europe styles if you don't believe me... And leezone... You can't honestly tell me that after your cosigning Tony's bad rap on the Audya, and slamming it for the lack of every cutting edge computer technology that no other arranger has either (I have to discount the MS, because even its' manufacturer now acknowledges it isn't an arranger!), that if they brought it out basically as is but in a box, that you would swallow all your words and buy one..? My flabber is ghasted I bet I get an MS before you buy an Audya!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280805 - 02/06/10 01:28 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
Diki,
yes i realize it has 64mb RAM and small HD, and USB 1.1, etc,
BUT
it is BY FAR the most realistic "live sounding" arranger out today, at least for MY music.
it sounds LIVE, much more than ANY other arranger,
Diki, you try the AUDYA through a REAL PA, and then your G-70, and i GUARANTEE you that YOU will be convinced.
you GOTTA try it out
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280808 - 02/06/10 08:00 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 04/01/01
Posts: 4390
Loc: Norway
|
Anthony is right in his statement regarding Technics. Yes, I'll buy Ketron again, but I'm not not going to buy Audya befrore I see what this update will change and/or add. I've got a very very good offer by have it shipped from our neighbour country. Legally from a music store and imported the right way, and still half the price compared to what we have to pay here. In this case it will end up at the same level as Tyros3 and PA2X Pro in this country, aprox US $5000. We'll see .... Btw, Musikmesse 2010 will be held in Frankfurt am Main from March 24 to 27, 2010. Looks like Ketron will be at Hall 5.0 B26. http://musik.messefrankfurt.com/frankfurt/en/exhibitor.details.html/ketron-s-r-l.html Maybe this is the time and place they will release the updated OS and other news... if any? Cheers GJ
_________________________
Cheers 🥂 GJ _______________________________________________ "Success is not counted by how high you have climbed but by how many you brought with you." (Wil Rose)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280810 - 02/06/10 10:58 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
Originally posted by Bachus: Its LOGIC58(Marcello Colo) on youtube and he really shows what Audya is all about.
The Audya certainly has a strong, robust, and "live" sound for sure...more than any other arranger. Still, I prefer the Yamaha more compressed and refined sound for my work, which mainly involves recording and playing restaurant background music (of course, that's why I use Yamaha exclusively). For dance stuff, the Audya definitely has the goods. Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280813 - 02/06/10 12:43 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Lee, you don't have to convince me how good the Audya sounds... From the first time I heard the demos, no matter WHAT my criticism of the arranger, the sound was never one of them But there are still MUSICAL and operational problems, as far as I am concerned. I can still hear MIDI and audio guitar parts swapping in and out, depending on chord played, and I am also someone that doesn't like to use the same style for more than one or two songs, so a never ending supply of fresh styles and beats, lots of conversions and user edited styles are very important to me. The deal with audio loops makes the pool of people creating new and translated styles MUCH smaller than the Big3's resources, plus, as I have said before, tweaking the drum kit for variety, tweaking the guitars for variety (SO easy to do on a Roland!) is completely out with a loop. I have many styles where I have used the Roland's Cover Tools (a simple 'one button' complete revoice of a style) to create something fresh, or turn a rock style into something a bit softer, and the nature of Ketron's audio loops negates this idea totally. If you are content with ONLY the included ROM styles in an Audya, you are good to go. But how GOOD those styles sound is also its' Achilles heel... translated styles and user styles won't sound NEARLY as good, and from what I've seen for the SD-1/5/3, Ketron aren't exactly overwhelming you with new content all the time... No doubt at all it sounds great OOTB (one of my primary concerns), but where you can take it from THERE is more limited than what I currently have. Perhaps, when Ketron address making new styles from loops as easy as other manufacturers make editing and 'frankenstyling' (thanks, Ian!) theirs, and show us their commitment to a steady supply of new styles, when Ketron show us whatever passes for their style editing tools in new OS's, I can revisit the issue. I wish my G70 sounded that good... but I also wish the Audya was as friendly as my G70 to rework the styles. Time will tell.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280821 - 02/07/10 11:23 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
so AJ,
AUDYA-M is a REALITY?
Diki,
why AUDYA module? because i can take it to practice easily, easy transport, as i can have keyboards at home and friends house, and just plug in AUDYA and module
i can use 88key like was said,
or i can plug it to my AKAI MPK61 or my smaller Korg XD3, or even a 25 key key controller JUST for chords/accomp,
and use another keyboard for solo/right hand, etc
you see, versatility is what the AUDYA-M would give you...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280824 - 02/07/10 04:40 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/25/00
Posts: 1211
Loc: Queretaro, Mexico
|
Gunnar and Anthony:
Regarding Technics...... Is very different way some business are conducted in USA and Mexico than in Europe, many manufacturers give certain line and or models to "Organ & Piano" stores, and others to "Combo/Pro" line stores, and the markup prices in the Piano & Organ stores are VERY HIGH. Here Roland did the same with the E80 and G70, then later, changed and probably a little to late.
I saw it myself several years ago the KN7000 in the store in Phoenix AZ with a tag of $6,000.00 dls....about the same of the AUDYA now....and that was 7 years ago more or less. If that is not high, well.....
And even before I moved to USA, in Mexico I saw a similar situation, for a fact, I know that a KN 6500 was sold for $4,500.00 dls. to a friend of mine, whom I later sold my Ketron SD1.
Now, if you have a more "relaxed" markup, the sales chances are to be MUCH higher, therefore more revenue....
Is just the way it was.
------------------ mdorantes
_________________________
mdorantes
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280827 - 02/08/10 02:10 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
AFAIK, Ketron don't offshore their production. It is still, I understand, being made in the EU, in Italy, right? The reason Roland, Yamaha and Korg have managed to keep prices low is to manufacture them in China, with their artificially low wages. Unless Ketron take this step (very difficult to do - look at all the labor problems Roland had moving arranger production from Italy to China), I doubt you are going to see a big drop in their prices. You want a state of the art audio/MIDI arranger, with features no other arranger has, and you want it CHEAPER? What is being smoked by some of our members?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280828 - 02/08/10 08:33 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Originally posted by Diki: AFAIK, Ketron don't offshore their production. It is still, I understand, being made in the EU, in Italy, right?
The reason Roland, Yamaha and Korg have managed to keep prices low is to manufacture them in China, with their artificially low wages. Unless Ketron take this step (very difficult to do - look at all the labor problems Roland had moving arranger production from Italy to China), I doubt you are going to see a big drop in their prices. You want a state of the art audio/MIDI arranger, with features no other arranger has, and you want it CHEAPER?
What is being smoked by some of our members? Beleive me if i tell you that all the components come from south eastern production, all they do in Ittaly is assembly of the systems and software install.. The high prices for Ketron are mainly because of the hugh investment in new technologies (Auio styles) research and development combined with the relatively low number of systems they sell.. And espescially this major part of the cost needs to be done in europe as they have the knowledge. Electonics hardware (components) is becomming cheeper every day, so the hardware can't be a main part of the costs.. its the software development Since Yamaha sells much more units they can spread out the development costs of new technologies over much more keyboards and so it has less influence on the price.. For instance Yamaha's development investment intoo super articulation sounds will make them money in Tyros, top models PSR and Motif... For Ketron there is just a relatively low number of Auya's to gaet their investments back.. So all in all, Ketron is to small a company to compete with Roland Korg and Yamaha based on proces, and they can only sell their products if they have a substantiall better quallity then the competition.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280829 - 02/08/10 10:10 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/30/06
Posts: 3944
|
Originally posted by Bachus: Beleive me if i tell you that all the components come from south eastern production, all they do in Ittaly is assembly of the systems and software install..
The high prices for Ketron are mainly because of the hugh investment in new technologies (Auio styles) research and development combined with the relatively low number of systems they sell.. And espescially this major part of the cost needs to be done in europe as they have the knowledge.
Electonics hardware (components) is becomming cheeper every day, so the hardware can't be a main part of the costs.. its the software development
Since Yamaha sells much more units they can spread out the development costs of new technologies over much more keyboards and so it has less influence on the price..
For instance Yamaha's development investment intoo super articulation sounds will make them money in Tyros, top models PSR and Motif... For Ketron there is just a relatively low number of Auya's to gaet their investments back..
So all in all, Ketron is to small a company to compete with Roland Korg and Yamaha based on proces, and they can only sell their products if they have a substantiall better quallity then the competition. Bachus I have been in PCB and electronic development before and what you say is correct, it would be better for Ketron to make up and assemble outside of Italy. I don’t know if the people running Ketron would want to do that, every KB they release appears to be behind the times the day it comes onto the market. Ketron appear to have a fundamental flaw and perhaps its management, they survive only by luck and avoiding a major crisis by default. I think they must live on a knife edge, certainly not in the fast lane, if the shares came on the market it would be like Lehman Brothers all over again. If you look closely at the PA2x and forget how each sample sounds, take this out of it, the KBs perhaps look similar, but there is much more technology in the PA2x than the Audya. But the cost of the PA2x is £2000.00 below the Audya, you need to look if there is £2000.00 more in sounds, or will there be on OS4, but we haven’t got OS4 and there is no guarantee that we will ever get it. My advice to anyone is to hold off buying Audya until you see the whites of Ketron eyes, it’s all bull**** at the moment and it’s not worth the extra £2000.00. The cost to build the Audya will be much less than the PA2x which ever country it’s built in. Your Quote "The high prices for Ketron are mainly because of the hugh investment in new technologies" Don't believe a word of this, they are well behind. Tony [This message has been edited by Tony Hughes (edited 02-08-2010).]
_________________________
Tyros 4/Pair SR 350/ PC with a i8 intel chip, XENYX 802, Ford Focus 2 litre/Tascam DR07/Brother printer/Designjet 500/ our Doris/5 Grandchildren/ white boxers short Kymart shipped over and Typhoo Tea Earl Grey
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280841 - 02/10/10 11:03 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Member
Registered: 12/13/05
Posts: 664
Loc: Italy
|
Originally posted by Diki: Well, we ALL know you aren't going to get one, so is this question academic, or just curiosity?
You KNOW it won't have USB3, 1TB HD, 2GB RAM, all the other things that no keyboard in the WORLD has, yet, and it won't be much cheaper (if any) than the current Audya is. So, you'll still sit on the sidelines and bitch...
Personally, if an Audya was in my future, it would be the 76 version. The module worries me (I'd love to add one to my G70) because Ketron's MIDI implementation on the Audya looks barebones at best. They would have to SERIOUSLY beef up that section before it would be practical, IMO.
But I am content with USB1, let alone USB3, won't use the sampler live much (and prefer VSTi samplers and my Kurzweil in the studio), so won't need 2GB sample RAM (which, even at the Audya's pretty decent load up speed, would take a month of Sunday's to fill ), and realize that, in practical terms, a 1TB HD would remain mostly empty even with ALL the real world sounds I'd ever need on board, I am STILL far more concerned that, if I played a Gsus7 chord, my audio guitarist would PLAY a Gsus7 chord, not some MIDI stand-in...
So, in fairness, I am not so much waiting for a 61 or a module of the Audya... I am waiting for a TRUE Audya2 with the horsepower and capabilities to do what we all wanted it to do (musically) in the first place. who know? maybe they give the possibility to insert also the new USB 3.0 http://www.asrock.com/mb/spec/Card.asp?Model=USB%203.0%20Card on Linux OS system is full working, try to ask, maybe they can add too..who know?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280843 - 02/10/10 05:52 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/24/08
Posts: 3131
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280849 - 02/12/10 07:44 AM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
So you end up making the same money for working twice as hard? Sorry, but naturally, I assumed you were already working as much as you wanted to... It's just this: "more sounds (modern), SA type sounds, more variety of styles, more modern, more memory (RAM and HD or better yet SSD) everything MORE, EXCEPT price, " is simply dreaming. But, maybe the Tooth Fairy DOES exist (and is shacking up with Santa) Me, I want a Bugatti Veyron, for the price of a Camry. Am I asking too much?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280858 - 02/12/10 02:27 PM
Re: Is an AUDYA-61 or AUDYA-M in YOUR future ???
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Originally posted by cgiles: Americans are too dumb to learn the metric system........except for the drug dealers. They all know what a 'kilo' is .
chas
You see, chas... that's how you get Americans to adopt the same standards used by the rest of the world... You refuse to pander to their inability to change. If no-one would ever sell us anything except in decimal quantities, especially the things we are addicted to (oil, fatty foods, chocolate ) we would convert in a flash! Look, I come from the generation that went from pounds shillings and pence to 100 pennies in a pound (see? There IS something you guys had decimal right from the start. Why you didn't go all the way beats me!), and from miles and yards to meters and kilometers. It can be done. If the English can embrace the decimal system, surely the Yanks aren't prepared to let us beat them at something so simple? As dumbed down as high school is getting over here, why anyone wants to figure things out in feet, inches yards and miles and gallons and quarts (if a car does ten miles to the gallon, how much do we owe the Saudi's to drive the perimeter of an acre plot of land? ) beats the bejeesus out of me. Maybe we all think that American Business will use our ignorance to simply jack the price up on everything? But hey, they're doing that now, anyway. Seen the SIZE of a candy bar lately?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|