SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#281306 - 02/12/10 05:49 PM Sounds quality of arranger
Mystic Jammer Offline
Member

Registered: 01/10/10
Posts: 41
Loc: quebec
!

[This message has been edited by Mystic Jammer (edited 02-13-2010).]
_________________________
www.musicienmystique.com
Keyboard: Korg-M1
Computer: MacBook Pro, 2.4 GHz dual-core, 4 GB RAM
Software: Logic 9, Kore 2, NI-Komplete

Top
#281307 - 02/12/10 06:00 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
cgiles Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 09/29/05
Posts: 6703
Loc: Roswell,GA/USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Jammer:

I don't want to start a little war......


Really? In any case, at this stage of your "keyboard journey", it might be more fruitful for you to be concentrating on learning to PLAY the keyboard rather than worrying about the (highly subjective) subtleties of which TOTL keyboard has the best sounds. They all sound lousy if you can't play, just as they all sound good if you can. Priorities, my man, priorities.

chas
_________________________
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzsche]

Top
#281308 - 02/12/10 07:32 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
Irishacts Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1631
Loc: Ireland
Quote:
I don't know if it's me or if it's real but i find the quality of the Korg m3 sounds superior to the one i had on my s910


Your talking about two completely different technologies, so it's no wonder. It's like very old VS very new.

The M3 is based on the almighty OASYS, and it's EDS sound engine is new and ultra deep. Its an evolution of AI1, AI2, Access, and Hi-Sys. So your talking about 5 different synth engines of evolution in total.

Where on the other hand you have a Yamaha S910 which uses AWM2. Yamaha have been milking that cow for 15 years or more and have not developed a new PCM based engine since.

My 2 cents.

James.

[This message has been edited by Irishacts (edited 02-12-2010).]

Top
#281309 - 02/12/10 07:56 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
FransN Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1415
Loc: Netherlands
I think you can't compare a M3 with a PSR. You must compare a M3 with a Yamaha Motif XS or Roland Fantom. If you compare a Korg keyboard with a Yamaha keyboard then yes I agree that Korg just sound better. But this is also personal.

Top
#281310 - 02/12/10 08:25 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
For my part, I think a lot depends on what kind of music you prefer to do. Modern WS's excel at complex electronic sounds, etc., but their emphasis isn't always geared towards acoustic sounds. Many arrangers, IMO have some acoustic sounds that are FAR better than some of the top WS's. Your S910's SA sounds are hard to beat (if played well) by most WS's, even including the MoXS, which has a derivation of the SA spec originally invented FOR arranger players.

But heed chas carefully, in his advice. He has hit the nail on the head. From your demo, it's clear you have quite a way to go before the basic sound is going to matter very much...

Walk first, run later.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
#281311 - 02/12/10 08:26 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
travlin'easy Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
Chas hit the nail on the head!

Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!

K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)

Top
#281312 - 02/12/10 08:33 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
FransN Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1415
Loc: Netherlands
In defence of MJ. You don't have to play well to hear the differences between keyboards and synths. And I mean the total sound not some SA solo sounds.

[This message has been edited by FransN (edited 02-12-2010).]

Top
#281313 - 02/12/10 08:41 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
But you DO have to play well enough for people to look past your errors and appreciate the sound...

Few people, even musicians, can look past an awful performance and go 'that synth sounds great'.

Performance first, sound later. Use what you would have spent on the TOTL on lessons with a sympathetic understanding teacher, and your music grows by leaps and bounds. Spend it all on the best synth and continue to self educate, and your progress is a fraction of what it COULD be...

Just a thought.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
#281314 - 02/12/10 08:57 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
FransN Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1415
Loc: Netherlands
Yes there you are right. But what I actually mean is if you play the arranger by pressing a chord you will hear the difference between brand A and brand B. I don't want to go in details here but I go for the more live like sound.

[This message has been edited by FransN (edited 02-12-2010).]

Top
#281315 - 02/12/10 09:11 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
ianmcnll Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
I found the "sound" of the M3 rather bland in both presentations by MJ and James.

Nothing bland about the patterns...they were very interesting and it seems there are lots of possibilities.

It would be even better to hear the instrument triggering some DNC voices, instead of basic GM sounds.

Any chance of hearing that?

Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.

Top
#281316 - 02/12/10 09:12 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
Diki Offline


Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
Can't argue that, but MJ seems a bit too focused on the technical aspects of music at this point, and those of us skilled enough to appreciate those differences are often forgetful about what it was like when WE couldn't play, yet...

He's got a while to go before getting the TOTL is going to do anything more than just make life more complicated for him. S910 sounds like a VERY good starter arranger. He'll know when he really NEEDS something better to progress if he listens to himself critically..

If noodling to new age arpeggiation backing is the END point of what he wants to do, then perhaps now is a good time to get an M3 or Oasys, and bliss out on 'heart of space' music to his content. But if he wants to progress further than he is now, sticking with a good all-rounder (some of the S910's pads and synth sounds are quite excellent) and concentrating on some basic lessons will yield the better, faster improvement, I think...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!

Top
#281317 - 02/12/10 09:22 PM Re: Sounds quality of arranger
FransN Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1415
Loc: Netherlands
I totally agree. Even I find all that Karma talk very complicated.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online