|
|
|
|
|
|
#282899 - 03/09/10 09:05 PM
Re: Tyros 3, Tyros 4, and Pa800
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14286
Loc: NW Florida
|
It looks like Roland think the ENTIRE arranger market isn't worth the bother any more, at least all but bottom price budget stuff...
And if any DGX had a FRACTION of the capabilities of even an S910, they'd have no-one complaining. But they still refuse to put a TOTL, or even MOTL arranger ENGINE in any affordable, portable 88, let alone a 76.
I never have understood, when Yamaha have shown the capability to basically dominate arranger sales in the 61 arena, why they choose not to finish of the beast. You have your competition by the jugular, you don't let him slip out your grasp and find a niche market that allows him to survive...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282903 - 03/11/10 12:26 AM
Re: Tyros 3, Tyros 4, and Pa800
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14286
Loc: NW Florida
|
I started to see the writing on the wall when Roland didn't simply pack the E80 in a G70 case and sell it as the G80... That, at least, would have kept the product line ticking over with minimal re-tooling, got a few people to upgrade from G70 or bring in a few from other companies. E80 had three times the MFX insert effects that G70 had, twice (or is it 3X?) the SRX slots, lyrics for styles display (G70 only has lyrics for SMF's), .BMP graphics output for displaying lead sheet images, and an upgrade gave it MP3 playlist capabilities. It had a lot more samples from some premium SRX boards (while it lost a few Sound Canvas oldies that were in the G70 for legacy compatibility), two separate Mastering FX sections, one for style/smf, one for keyboard side (stopped getting crispy on the keyboard side from ducking the accompaniment) and many other fixes and additions (fixed velocity for Parts for organs and old-school synth sounds e.g.). If they had JUST put that in a G70 case and fixed a couple of niggles, I MIGHT have gone for it, I'm sure many G-series fans would have gone for it, and it would have addressed a bunch of 'missing feature' naysayers from other camps. Why Roland couldn't be bothered to do this escapes me... But their departure from the MOTL and TOTL areas seems to have decided upon at LEAST three years ago, when the E80 wasn't repackaged as a G... Anyway, I'm glad they never informed anybody... it kept the used prices of TOTL Roland's down Now, they might be collectors' pieces... the LAST Roland high end arrangers EVER (glad I've got TWO! )
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|