|
|
|
|
|
|
#286813 - 04/30/10 11:53 PM
MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/13/08
Posts: 1144
Loc: Staten Island, NYC
|
I wanna say few things here from my own experience, knowledge and opinion since many times people get confused and also people CLAIM that a Style made on Yammy or Korg with RX or MV wont sound any good on a DAW only due to the Multi Layers which is Completely Wrong. First explanations for those who dont know: RX-RealExperience - Korg's Technology for MultiLayered Voices. MegaVoices - Yamaha's terminology of MultiLayered Voices SA - Yamaha's SuperArticulation Voices which has nothing to do with layers but has to do with commands and messages sent to the sound itself as Switches, Velocity, Portamento or Staccato playing and many other things that can be implemented but at the end they all trigger just another Layer or Oscilator of samples, nothing else. DNC - Korg's Defined Nuance Control, same as the above Yamaha SA voices. Korg PA2X/800 can have 6 layers for drums and 16 layers for sounds, DNC or RX, both ways. About Yamaha i dont know exactly about sounds but i think Drums is only 7. The Question is ''why a Style that uses MultiLayered Voices wont sound good on another Library which actually also has MultiLayered Voices''...and my own answer is thats a wrong statement. The Example i gave in the PA800/MS discussion is the same exact thing as this, the style uses RX Voices on Korg, Multilayered, especially the Drums while at the same time the same Style uses MultiLayered Drums in Goliath too but this time instead of 6 layers uses 127 layers...WOW! Same goes for Sounds, why wouldnt a 16 Layers Guitar not sound good on a 127 Layers Guitar? Actualy IN EVERY CASE it should sound better due to more correct layering and sounds. Again this is my opinion and what i've learned, tested, compared and never found that it was worst or impossible, in most cases was only better, livelier, fuller and warmer. I wrote this only cuz few times people in here claimed Style Conversion due to MultiLayers wont end up good which can be true but only Convrting a 6 Layered Drum to 1 Sinlge Layer Drum on a PA500 not even there or bringing a T3 Style to a PSR1500 but not in the case of bringing 6 layers of Korg or Yamaha to 127 Layers of any of todays Libraries or even a Style from PA500 to a PA2X...the more the layers the more precise sound will come out, each hit is different.
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL. 2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286814 - 05/01/10 12:24 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
To be honest, Nedim, you are making this sound a lot simpler than it is. Mega voices aren't JUST velocity switched layers. They are also non-pitched sounds, on single notes, which DON'T get transposed while the pitched ones do (that's quite a complex thing to get a single style Part to do on many arrangers), in addition to trigger notes that don't make any sound at all, but affect the notes that ARE playing (chord mutes, for instance). Sure, there are similar things on GIGA layers and triggers, and many of the VSTi's out there, but the issue is, how easy (if it possible at all) is it to map the control triggers from one format to another..? They are CERTAINLY nothing like each other, one system may rely on CC#'s, another on specific notes that need to be held in combination with other notes being played, etc., etc.. Now, I don't know about you, but I don't know of ANY translation software that is complex enough to make rules for these types of gross differences so that the translation is automated (converting note#'s into CC# of a specific value, for instance, and another value for note off). And that leaves you basically hand converting each of the styles actual note data, part by part, division by division, chord type by chord type... For every style you want to do that on. Once again, there's this aura of theoretical knowledge about this, rather than actual practice. Lord knows, I've tried my level best to get Yamaha Mega Voice Parts to translate well to Roland's... I'm not making this sh*t up! Perhaps AFTER you have actually TRIED to do this, and perhaps shown us the results, you can start to tell us all how easy it is? BTW, Yamaha's SA2 technology can't be used in the style, but Korg's DNC voices CAN. Along with a VERY complex Guitar Mode that works in style mode, and gives very accurate guitar voicings and strumming/picking patterns that are interactive with the player. While, once again, there are VSTi's out there that do strumming and picking, it is usually in audio, for one thing, and uses a COMPLETELY different set of trigger notes and control codes. Which once again makes translation a 'by hand' note for note issue again. I agree that in THEORY, a multi-sampled drumkit OUGHT to translate reasonably easily to a GIGA kit with more layers (though you may be forced to heavily edit the GIGA kit to reflect sample layers that aren't simply increased force ( (tom-toms that turn into tom-tom flams at the top of the velocity range, for instance), but admittedly, this is a 'once done, finished with' process. But some of the more complex things that Mega Voice technology, and DNC voices can do go FAR beyond this, I'm afraid...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286815 - 05/01/10 12:35 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/13/08
Posts: 1144
Loc: Staten Island, NYC
|
I agree with you completely on this, DNC and SA is different thing but when MultiLayering the closed Synths are not at that stage yet as Kontakt or Play or other Sampling Softwares do for example using Keys/Notes as CCs to do many things such in Kontakt if you hold a particular Key the whole Guitar will Strum thruought the Keyboard or Slide or whatever but its not Multi Layering only, it also has to do with other functions on the Software itself such in this case as Scripts in Kontakt. Basic Multilayering as in the case of bringing Korg's Style to Kontakt should be very easy, as i already did with the PA800/MS comparison, almost all of the Voices are Multi Layered, in both, PA800 and Goliath and i hear the Layers in Both if played track by track or all at once but overall i agree with you but todays hardware synths are not up to that point yet. The only thing that can get as close as that is M3 with KARMA which can do similar things as i explained above doing things while holding a certain Key on the Keyboard. On the other hand where you mentioned Guitar Mode on Korg, thats a completely different thing and has nothing to do with layering, it can be brought to a MIDI, Library or a DAW but it is a lot of work doing that, you have to Sample and tweak a lot of things, if you attach a Guitar to one of those big Computer Libraries it might sound way ahead but its not worth doing it. It will be better using just a Computer Guitar Emulator which i use Real Guitar and it works fine for me, better then Guitar Mode on KorgPA since its library is really vast and relies on really big Samples.
[This message has been edited by Nedim (edited 04-30-2010).]
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL. 2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286817 - 05/01/10 12:47 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/13/08
Posts: 1144
Loc: Staten Island, NYC
|
As i said, i agree with you and that is correct but if MegaVoices work same as RX which i believe they do then they dont do nothing besides Layering. RX is only Layering of Voices on Korg while at the same time DNC kicks in and same goes for Yamaha MV and then SA kicking in. No, i cant do nothing with DNC or SA.
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL. 2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286818 - 05/01/10 12:51 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/13/08
Posts: 1144
Loc: Staten Island, NYC
|
Originally posted by Nedim: No, i cant do nothing with DNC or SA.[/B] Actually wrong statement (-: so you dont catch me on words...i can do a lot and way more then Korg and Yamaha, i dont have to translate their DNC and SA but if i use a Style on an open System then i wont use Yamaha's SA, i will use a SA from a 150GB Library... Am i wrong? UPZ! Cuz we said, why would we transfer them? If we go to an open System...well if we go there, why would i wanna translate SA or DNC? I'll just use some thing WAY better then them.
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL. 2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286820 - 05/01/10 01:02 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
Well, I believe that you are wrong, then in that case. Mega Voices are NOT just simply velocity triggers, as I have tried my best to explain. Some of them are, some of them are NOT. You are also forgetting about the issue of non-pitched sounds not transposing, while pitched ones do. If the MS transposes the entire Track, then those non-pitched sounds will change (into Lord knows what!) as the chords move. On a Yamaha, they don't. If Mega Voices and RX were the exact same thing, Yamaha wouldn't have needed to invent a whole different term for them... BTW, once again, my knowledge about this ISN'T mere conjecture. I made a determined effort to see if I could use a Motif Rack to play Translated Yamaha styles from my Roland, it having some Mega Voices on board. This is when I found out about the issue of Tracks having transposed AND non-transposed notes all on the same Track. I simply wish that you would take the time to actually TRY this stuff out before you go ahead and tell us about it. Like I have, for instance...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#286821 - 05/01/10 01:05 AM
Re: MegaVoices, RX, MultiLayers, SAVoices, DNC e tc. Confusion
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/13/08
Posts: 1144
Loc: Staten Island, NYC
|
Well then i am wrong, i own a Motif but i never tried running styles, as for Korg its simple, all they do is have their own layering and nothing weird going there, Korg wins...LOLZ!
_________________________
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL. 2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|