|
|
|
|
|
|
#287619 - 05/17/10 07:16 AM
Re: Do you use Synchro on/off on songs like this?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
I also find the Sync-Stop button difficult to work with, therefore, for the few songs that I need this function I use a workaround. Louis Prima's Buona Sera and Just A Gigolo are classic examples. I utilize a registration where the sync-start is activated, then the style begins playing. No intro, break or fill--just the style. The way it works is you fire up the style, play the intro, get into the song, and when you need that extended break just press the registration button. Then, when you're ready to resume the song, or in the case of Buona Sera, make a transition from a tango to jump jive, the tango is the first registration button and the jump-jive is the second. Works for me, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#287623 - 05/17/10 10:58 PM
Re: Do you use Synchro on/off on songs like this?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
Was going to comment that most of these situations are covered better by a 'break' than having to stop then restart by hand or footswitch. Timing critical things like this are best left to the machine... Mind you, it's good practice to see if YOUR timing is spot on... Maybe if you can hit the one PERFECTLY every time you use a bar break (complete silence, not a break/fill), you might have good enough time to do it by foot or hand, but you'd be surprised (especially if you record it and listen back carefully) how hard it is to be that precise, especially in the heat of gigging... I DO like the Audya's four break/fill choices, though. This is something that other manufacturers really need to jump on, as the B/F during Var1 isn't really anything that ought to work in Var4 (and vice versa). One just doesn't seem enough to cover all your needs... Me, as the Roland's don't have a B/F (just a break), I'll hit the break switch on the one, then hit the fill switch (I do it all with my feet) on the three or four if I need a B/F, or just leave it silent for a full Break... Works pretty well, and at least I get a different fill depending on the Variation. The thing is, Breaks often need YOU to play through them, sometimes with quite a signature lick or flourish, and doing everything with your feet allows you to do these with both hands (if needed)...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#287628 - 05/18/10 01:36 PM
Re: Do you use Synchro on/off on songs like this?
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14277
Loc: NW Florida
|
I simply feel that, if you are playing well, BOTH hands ought to be tied up! Yes, there are a lot of songs you can maybe get away from the chord input, but OTOH, there are a LOT of songs where there are often quite a few passing chords leading up to a break... after all, it is a strong point of the song, and usually has a build up to it. Hence, I prefer to do all this control stuff with my feet. To be honest, I wish I could do EVERYTHING with footswitches, and simply PLAY with my hands 100%, but no OS (that I know of) really allows you to do this - Roland have a LOT of F/S choices (and a 7 pedal and two switch pedal inputs) but it still doesn't cover ALL your possible needs. What really gets my goat is that, when it comes to possible footswitch needs and choices, it all seems so arbitrary what is offered as part of the OS. Some things get included, some things don't. It just seems so utterly LAZY... after all, it's just a list of sources and destinations, not exactly rocket science for a programmer, but it seems as if, for no apparent reason, the engineers go 'Why BOTHER making it comprehensive - maybe we can hit the pub earlier if we just give them a smaller selection?!' As just about every arranger is completely software driven these days, I see no reason why ANY input (switch, footswitch, button, slider, D-beam, knob, Data Wheel, whatever) on the arranger ought not to be possibly connected to ANY destination the OS offers. How many of us have looked at another arranger and gone 'Why, oh why did they put THAT there? I would MUCH prefer it HERE' A simple Global re-map of the arranger's knobs (or even better, per registration) would allow us MUCH greater customization, at the cost of only a few more lines of code. It could even be hidden under an 'Expert Mode' page, so that it doesn't frighten or confuse the newbies and casual players. But it seems SUCH a useful option at the cost of little coding. Shame they are too anxious to get to the pub...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|