I'm just curious why anyone thinks the built-in speakers DO sound terrific...? My experience of them has made me feel they are anything BUT!
Once you play an arranger through a GOOD set of nearfield studio monitors, you immediately start to hear what you have been missing, and you finally get to hear what your audience is going to hear (assuming you have a reasonably decent PA) when you play out to them.
Some of them DO sound a bit better than others, but, as has been said, ONLY from the playing position, and definitely only up to a certain volume, but even the best of them is a poor substitute for even a medium priced set of studio monitors.
Try playing high quality .wav's through the built-ins, or high bitrate MP3's of well recorded music (my fave is always the old Nightfly album, by Donald Fagan), then compare to even the sound of a modest home stereo, let alone a good set of studio monitors, and you start to hear JUST how uneven and gutless these little pint-sized speakers actually are, IMO...
I hear all too many user demos that are tubby, and lacking in mid-range presence, with high's that sizzle out and fatigue you, and usually know that the culprit is listening to the performance through the built-ins, and compensating for their poor performance. But once the same recording gets played through REAL speakers, the hyped curve of the little speakers becomes all too obvious.
Don't get to like them TOO much!
![](http://www.synthzone.com/ubbs/cool.gif)