![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#311994 - 01/13/11 08:57 AM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: TommyF]
|
Member
Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 648
Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
OK, I did some research on my own: It is called the BK-7m. This french site has some information: http://www.audiokeys.net/forum/showthread.php/26169-NAMM-2011-ROLAND-BK-7m-Module-d-accompagnementA quick Google translation gives us: - Module accompanying ultra compact MIDI compatible instruments like pianos, accordions, organs or keyboards - Over 1,000 sounds, 57 drum kits, 128-voice polyphony - More than 400 musical styles each with 4 memories "One Touch" - More than 900 registrations Music Assistant for a large repertoire - Playback SMF and audio directly from USB port - Audio files in WAV format on a USB connected - Function "Cover" for SMF and musical styles - Composite video output for display The full details will probably be available in 4 hours on the Roland Connect site: http://www.rolandconnect.com/
_________________________
Yamaha PSR-S770, Korg Krome 61
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312073 - 01/13/11 01:32 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: miden]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14327
Loc: NW Florida
|
Sorry to say, but those specs look VERY Sonic Cell-ish. Drum kits are upped, but the '1000 plus Tones' is basic Sonic Cell specs, not the additional 'World' variants which double the ROM for the Prelude and GW-x and add several hundred new tones (amongst which are usually some of the standouts, IMO).
Nice to see an FC-7 pedal input (but what else can they do with a remote, anyway!)
Only one LWR tone and two UPR's is definitely NOT comparable to three UPR and two LWR (and an MBS) from Roland's TOTL.
Now, don't get me wrong, this looks like a GREAT way for non-Roland users to get an easy way to add the Roland sounds and styles to their arsenal (if their arranger's MIDI implementation is flexible enough), and, if the drum kits include all the Latin stuff in the GW-8L (which I thought were superb), this still might be something I could go for to add some arranger capabilities to my Kurzweil K2500 (mind you, hauling that thing around makes my G70 seem like a PSR!) if it isn't too expensive, but I still stand by what I initially thought...
A Prelude (bit stripped down in some areas, beefed up in others) in a box.
More later when I can download a full Parameter and Tone Chart and compare to what Roland already have out...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312107 - 01/13/11 02:58 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: TommyF]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312142 - 01/13/11 03:52 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: Diki]
|
Member
Registered: 11/24/06
Posts: 648
Loc: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
I expect to see it between $1000 and $1500, to be honest. Be a bargain if it's cheaper. Look, the Ketron Audya module is almost the same price as the Audya. It SURE isn't the same price as the little sound module they put out! Sweetwater has a sale price of $999, so Diki got it right this time ![wink wink](/forum/images/graemlins/default_dark/wink.gif) Sweetwater also have more detailed specs than the Roland site: Sounds: 1,092 tones, 57 drum sets (GM compatible) 128-voice maximum polyphony 19-part multitimbral sequencer (16 song parts + 3 external parts through MIDI input) Key and tempo controls for WAV and MP3 files Center cancel and Melody Mute functions available for playback Reverb, harmony, and other vocal effects available on Mic input 1 Song Chord Extractor automatic chord detection for SMF files Playlist lists function allows you to store favorite songs for automatic playback SMF covers: 30 demos USB recorder records audio files (WAV, 16-bit/44.1kHz linear format) and Slide shows picture folder linked to songs (recommended resolution: 1024 x 768 or 512 x 384 pixels) Real-time player: SMF (Format 0/1), KAR, mp3, WAV, mp3+CDG VIMA TUNES: Yes Lyrics: SMF and mp3/WAV SMF song section reverb: 8 types, chorus: 8 types, MFX A, B, C: 84 types, parametric EQ, multi-band compressor Display: 132 x 64 backlit LCD Headphone jack: Stereo 1/4" Audio inputs: 1 x 1/8" stereo, 2 x XLR/TRS Phantom power: Mic 1 USB connectors: 1 x type B (data storage), 1 x type A (for MIDI to and from computer) MIDI: In and Out Video output: Composite (PAL or NTSC, selectable) Audio outputs: 2 x 1/4" Power supply: 9V DC (via supplied AC adaptor) Current draw: 700 mA Dimensions: 10-3/4" (W) x 9-1/16" (D) x 3-3/16" (H) Weight: 3.56 lbs. Included accessories: owner's manual, AC adaptor, and Roland USB Memory M-UF2G http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/BK7m
_________________________
Yamaha PSR-S770, Korg Krome 61
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312243 - 01/13/11 07:11 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: abacus]
|
Member
Registered: 08/10/05
Posts: 436
Loc: Norway
|
I own RealStrat and RealGuitar, while they sound great, and work good in a mix - they do not sound like a real guitarist playing a real guitar. I also own GuitarRig, that is only effect and amp modelling - and again the models sound good, and work great in studio mixes - the models do not sound like their hardware counterparts. I have yet to try, hear and play any modelling software or hardware that sounds like a true vintage tube amp, or a vintage Tube Screamer for that matter. Even the new fancy "Reissue" tube amps do not sound like their grandfathers.
I'm not saying that all of these sound bad, I'm saying they don't sound or feel authentic. That being said, very few have the economic privilege to own every classic amp from a Champ and Plexi to JC-120, so in value things like GuitarRig and PODs hold their own, because they do sound good. It's just not the same as flicking a switch and watch those filaments warm up and crank the thing to 11 and hear those EL's, KT's or 6L's roar. Or incase you own a JCM800 100W the screams of your neighbours begging for their sanity.
DocZ
Edited by doc-z (01/13/11 07:16 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312339 - 01/14/11 06:44 AM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: doc-z]
|
Member
Registered: 07/16/09
Posts: 319
|
I own RealStrat and RealGuitar, while they sound great, and work good in a mix - they do not sound like a real guitarist playing a real guitar. I also own GuitarRig, that is only effect and amp modelling - and again the models sound good, and work great in studio mixes - the models do not sound like their hardware counterparts. I have yet to try, hear and play any modelling software or hardware that sounds like a true vintage tube amp, or a vintage Tube Screamer for that matter. Even the new fancy "Reissue" tube amps do not sound like their grandfathers.
I'm not saying that all of these sound bad, I'm saying they don't sound or feel authentic. That being said, very few have the economic privilege to own every classic amp from a Champ and Plexi to JC-120, so in value things like GuitarRig and PODs hold their own, because they do sound good. It's just not the same as flicking a switch and watch those filaments warm up and crank the thing to 11 and hear those EL's, KT's or 6L's roar. Or incase you own a JCM800 100W the screams of your neighbours begging for their sanity.
DocZ then you want MOR or MOR2 from Eastwest / Quantum Leap. This is the only thing I found that used REAL tube amps in the recordings of the samples. I have MOR 1. While it's advertised as a 'metal group' library, you'll find in there many great vintage sounds, like a fantastic clean Tele through a real old Fender amp, as well as strats, PRS guitars, etc, through a variety of amps. JCM800 metal stuff: http://www.soundsonline-europe.com/Ministry-Of-Rock/rock stuff: http://www.soundsonline-europe.com/Ministry-Of-Rock/I agree with you about the modelling technology. Sounds quite fake in the end compared to real tube amps. also check 'Fab Four' from the same company. I don't have this one library but there's some great demos there. Sounds like Beatles' equipment. http://www.soundsonline-europe.com/Fab-Four/And Goliath also has a nice array of real sounds from guitars and amps.... http://www.soundsonline-europe.com/Goliath/
Edited by arranger_yes_pc_no (01/14/11 06:54 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312341 - 01/14/11 07:18 AM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: doc-z]
|
Member
Registered: 07/16/09
Posts: 319
|
I own RealStrat and RealGuitar, while they sound great, and work good in a mix - they do not sound like a real guitarist playing a real guitar another thing you might want to try, is Band in a Box. It's Realtracks sounds like real performances (well, they are), and when it works well, the program is impressive. I have had many problems with it and in the end switched back to hardware arrangers, as I was wasting too much time. Even when it works well, the sheer amount of options are confusing. There is so much stuff for it that you'll find yourself sitting there for weeks. Also, in my experience it doesn't recognizes chords as well as the hardware arrangers. But for these Realtracks, it's hard to beat.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312342 - 01/14/11 07:48 AM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: rikkisbears]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5410
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
Hi Doc, unfortunately I can't play the video, I don't have Apple Quicktime. I installed it yesterday for another video clip, and I lost all sound on my Win7 laptop, had to uninstall, but my sound is back now, thank goodness.
Hi Rikki Go for the Full or mega versions and you can forget Apple QuickTime, as with this codec pack WMP will play all of them. (Make sure you tick all the boxes to assign all formats to WMP) Hi Rikki Go for the Full or mega versions and you can forget Apple QuickTime, as with this codec pack WMP will play all of them. (Make sure you tick all the boxes to assign all formats to WMP) http://www.codecguide.com/download_kl.htm Hope this helps Bill Hope this helps Bill
Edited by abacus (01/14/11 07:52 AM) Edit Reason: Forgot Link
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#312434 - 01/14/11 05:15 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: arranger_yes_pc_no]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6021
Loc: NSW,Australia
|
Hi, I'm thoroughly enjoying BIAB 2011, the program has so improved since the introduction of the Real tracks, they're great. I own RealStrat and RealGuitar, while they sound great, and work good in a mix - they do not sound like a real guitarist playing a real guitar another thing you might want to try, is Band in a Box. It's Realtracks sounds like real performances (well, they are), and when it works well, the program is impressive. I have had many problems with it and in the end switched back to hardware arrangers, as I was wasting too much time. Even when it works well, the sheer amount of options are confusing. There is so much stuff for it that you'll find yourself sitting there for weeks. Also, in my experience it doesn't recognizes chords as well as the hardware arrangers. But for these Realtracks, it's hard to beat.
_________________________
best wishes Rikki 🧸
Korg PA5X 88 note SX900 Band in a Box 2022
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#313228 - 01/20/11 01:22 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: TommyF]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14327
Loc: NW Florida
|
There's an FC-7 input on the BK-7m. Seven switches you can assign to whatever you need for foot triggering. Plus the unit seems small enough to mount right over the keyboard you are using to trigger it, and the layout seems to put all the main buttons you need on fairly big buttons, right at the front of it. Take a look at the layout, again, Scott. Things seem a LOT better than those old RA units (I had an RA90 for years) ever were.
I am not sure that this is really the right thing for someone that wants to use a controller and JUST this, as you say, might as well go for a regular arranger, but for someone wanting to add an arranger capability to a nice WS, or MIDI guitar, or MIDI accordion, etc., it's a well tested form factor.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/top_right_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/left_span.gif) |
#313254 - 01/20/11 02:54 PM
Re: NAMM 2011: Roland Arranger Module?
[Re: Scottyee]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
|
If you're an auto accomp arranger style keyboard player that requires quick on the fly access to all the arranger buttons while playing I don't recommend going the module route. I used to use a Roland RA800 (module version of the G800) along with a 'Roland A33' or 'Fatar 1176' keyboard controller, and found the module impossible to optimally position for easy access of its arranger buttons when playing the keyboard controller. I think modules better suited for karaoke vocalists, and solo instrumentalists (guitarists, horn players, accordionists, etc). A 'one piece' arranger keyboard unit's the best option imo. ![smile smile](/forum/images/graemlins/default_dark/smile.gif) Scott, I used the Ketron Midjay for a long time. It was pretty easy to position it to where you could easily access all controls; if fact it was easier than reaching them on some arrangers. This Roland module should be even easier because it is smaller. Also, you should have full midi controller from the controller keyboard, plus the foot controller and pedals. I am going to try one for sure. Subject to changing my fickle mind of course! DonM
_________________________
DonM
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/right_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_left_2.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_span.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_1.gif) |
![](http://www.synthzone.com/forum/styles/images/black_and_gold/bottom_right_2.gif) |
|
|