[quote=Scottyee it's not only "cheesy", but "dishonest", and further fuels the negative perception of arranger keyboards as merely entertainment toys to easily impress your audiences through deception.
[/quote]
Scott, this may come as a shock to you but you have just described at least 50% of those 'entertainers' performing with arranger keyboards. Although no one here will admit it, NO ONE but ARRANGER PLAYERS consider these keyboards as 'legitimate' instruments. That doesn't mean that some of the people that use them or make a living with them, aren't legitimate musicians or even good or great musicians; it just means that the established musical mainstream does not consider them as 'legitimate' instruments. Are they marvels of technology? Sure. Are they expensive enough to be 'pro'? You betcha' (in my best Sarah P. voice
). Do they have the 'sonic' quality and build quality to be used in a professional venue? Well, yeah, I think so. Do they LOOK 'pro' enough to take on stage? Most do.
Why then, do they command such little respect and even some derision, within the community of professional working (excluding OMB's) musicians. You also won't find them in any MAJOR studios, either. The reason, I suspect, is what you have outlined in the partial quote above; they always leave some doubt in the listener's mind about the level of your playing ability. Because you CAN decieve an audience, the assumption is that you will.
This post will be decried and rebutted on this board because it IS an ARRANGER BOARD. That doesn't mean it isn't true. Me, I love arrangers, especially the technology and ease of use. Would I ever take one on a gig? Not likely. That's because I don't have the skills (entertainment-wise or vocally) to function as a OMB (a talent all unto itself), and that is the only venue I could envision using one. For me personally, I'd much rather hear a great (solo) pianist at a restaurant or club than an entertaining arranger player. But then again, I don't dance either (forget the myth
).
chas