|
|
|
|
|
|
#313425 - 01/21/11 08:00 PM
The Rhodes revisited ...
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14376
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
Our grandaughter may be taking piano lessons, so I took the Rhodes out of storage (the garage) ... just taking it from the garage to the family room brought back all those memories of lugging it around ... if this was the only kb I had to play, my days as a gigging musician would definitely be over!!! ... Well, I set it up, and after some Windex on the keys and Armor All on the case, it looks pretty good ... Fortunately, all the notes play, it is in tune, and I couldn't believe how good it SOUNDS, and I'm playing it through a little $99 amp: http://www.acousticamplification.com/products/index.cfm?catid=1&&modid=13&product=AG15 which will be good enough for her home use ... Cleaned up, it looked ready for a gig - but NOT with me carrying it - The last people to play it were a niece and a nephew, who started to learn piano on it quite a number of years ago ... if our grandaughter does as well as they have, we will be very happy ... But, man, I must have been STRONG back in the day
_________________________
t.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313427 - 01/21/11 08:10 PM
Re: The Rhodes revisited ...
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
What Rhodes is it, Tony...the 73 or the 88? It's obviously the stage model. I had a Suitcase 88 for a while...very heavy, the action wasn't too bad (I had a Rhodes techie adjust it). The sound is such a signature sound...all the synths, digital pianos, arrangers, and workstations come close to duplicating the sound, but, like each Hammond B-3, each Rhodes was a little different from the others. Man, they sure were a job lugging around, but, back in the day, you really had to have that sound, or you weren't cool. Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313759 - 01/24/11 01:01 PM
Re: The Rhodes revisited ...
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
Strange to hear how much defense of poor plastic actions we see on this forum, but when you finally get the same people talking about some of the classic keys, their enthusiasm overcomes their natural defenses of their chosen arranger...
Playing a Rhodes was ALL about the action, as was a Wurli, a B3, a Clavinet, a Pianet, and most of the electro-mechanical keyboards of the day. What you COULD play, and HOW you could play it was a function of the action itself to quite a large degree. Each action lent itself to certain styles of playing, and to go beyond those limitations often took some considerable tinkering with the action and mechanical components to achieve. There was no 'master' keyboards back then, each sound required the adjustment of YOUR playing to it, and that is what beget the sound...
Nowadays, we give so little credit to the action itself for generating the 'sound', but I believe it still goes a long way to determining your performance. Simply sit at one of these old monsters, and play it for a few minutes, and you will find yourself playing things you never would have played on a plastic, spongy keyboard with fewer notes than these things have.
Function follows form...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313779 - 01/24/11 02:29 PM
Re: The Rhodes revisited ...
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
|
Tony, the Stage had no amplifier. The 73 Suitcase would need no amplifier. You must have a Stage-legs supporting the piano at the right height. Wouldn't need the separate amp if it were a Suitcase. In fact, you'd have to have a proprietary plug to use, and you wouldn't get the stereo effect unless you used a stereo amp.
The piano I sold Dave (he got the crappy one) is a suitcase. Great units, but both pieces are very heavy, and the Tolex cover is pretty easily damaged.
I used them for house jobs for years, but never considered moving them for one-nighters.
The stereo amplifiers made the Rhodes sound, in my opinion.
It's a great thing you're doing for the Grand kids.
(Thanks for the Xmas card, by the way)
Russ
Edited by captain Russ (01/24/11 02:30 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#313791 - 01/24/11 03:52 PM
Re: The Rhodes revisited ...
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
|
Yea, Tony, it's the Stage. And I understand what you meant when you played it recently and didn't want to give it up.
Now, there are lots of keys in the warehouse to use...a Clavinova, Casio 8000, SD-5, MS-60's, several synths, but nothing like the Rhodes. Believe it or not, the little NP-30 is the one I go to in my office if I just want to "noodle" around.
I understand about attachment to Rhodes pianos. Even though I'm glad one of mine went to Dave, I still remember a significant lump in my stomach as he and I were loading the one he got into his van, even though I had two at the time-one stayed here in the warehouse and one stays at the club where it's used 4-5 nights a month.
The kids will learn on the Stage, but will probably want something else if they stick with it. And, you'll still have the one keyboard that everyone who ever played one would still like to have.
Be well,
Russ
Edited by captain Russ (01/24/11 04:08 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|