|
|
|
|
|
|
#315080 - 02/03/11 06:49 AM
Re: Modern version of Ave Maria on Lionstracs
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
[But then many people overhere are better of with a Tyros 4, its easier to understand, and you can play everything just the way Yamaha wants you to play it.
Hey, it's as easy as fishin' to edit/assemble styles, and to make your own registrations and multi-pads...that's hardly bein' stuck at what a company feels you have to play. And, yes, it is a good thing the Tyros4 is easy to understand. I just taught a 72 year old grandmother how to edit/assemble and revoice a style (over the phone, no less)...she's almost as old as you and Chas. There's no need to be forced to accept what a company gives us anymore as far as styles...Yamaha does a pretty darn good job of giving us plenty of styles to edit to our own liking, not to forget the incredible number of third party styles. There's no excuse for being stuck with the same old styles over and over...not any more. Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#315216 - 02/04/11 01:32 PM
Re: Modern version of Ave Maria on Lionstracs
[Re: Bachus]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
I still don't get the point of running Yamaha styles on a Yamaha style player in the MS. I mean, for Pete's sake! Korg don't tout playing Yamaha styles as a 'feature', Yamaha don't even TRY to put Roland style compatibility into their arrangers. No arranger attempts to put the features in so you can play Ketron Live Loop styles.
Each of the majors stands or falls because of their OWN styles and sounds (a gestalt, or whole thing, made from two connected components).
Ian points out that it is a piece of cake to assemble and edit styles... Yes, true to an extent. BUT... what he's doing is editing and assembling (frankenstyling!) styles out of the ALREADY brilliant Yamaha styles in the first place. He's not creating them from scratch. He's certainly not hunting around in a disjointed VSTi instrument library for sounds that work well TOGETHER, to go along with that style.
The idea that the STRENGTH of an MS is it can emulate a Yamaha (except for Mega and SA2 voices, which, let's face it, are the BEST things in those styles!), and end up sounding little better than a cheap PSR is ludicrous. As I have been saying since day one, it's the CONTENT that makes the arranger. Unless you are Nicolas Damgaart (MidiSpot) or one of the top style creators (and even THEY don't have to work on creating a cohesive soundset), who exactly is going to benefit from the MS as an arranger?
I see it as a fabulous addition to an arranger, but standalone? Not until Dom blows a year's development costs on styles and a library of integrated sounds equal to the best TOTL arrangers. THEN, it is going to ROCK!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|