Ian,
So...now is the T4 as sweet as the S910...to your ears?

How would you make the comparison now that you have the T4?

Ian,
So...now is the T4 as sweet as the S910...to your ears?

How would you make the comparison now that you have the T4?

I liked the sound of the Tyros4 right out of the box, Lee.

Yes, it has that "sweetness" that is in the S910, but the sounds are also much richer and more robust.

The T3 was rich and robust, but it lacked the sweetness that was in the previous model, the T2.

Then again, the Tyros3 also has a loyal following who are very happy with the sound.

It just wasn't for me.

Sound is truly subjective.

For those big orchestral/synthy arrangements, the Tyros4 has no peer, in my opinion.

Ian

Diki: I could've certainly upgraded from T2 to T3 but didn't, not because of any lack of funds, but because I actually played and compared T2 & T3 'side by side' for a full day, and felt the T3 a step back sound wise from the T2.

Having now had the chance to compare 'all 3' (T2,T3,and T4), this time, I feel the newest kid on the block's a breakthrough winner because its the result of a marriage made in heaven:
T2's 'Sparkly Sweetness' + T3's 'Full Robust Richness' = Tyros 4!

Ian, Scott,
Very helpfull....
Thanks,

Look, guys, I'm not arguing that there is NO difference. All I'm saying is, just like it is sometimes hard to hear the 'improvement' between a PA2 and PA3, or a G70 and an E80 WHEN YOU DON'T REGULARLY PLAY THEM, so differences that appear night and day to Yamaha users can seem a little subtle to those not playing them all the time.

That's all...