|
|
|
|
|
|
#320129 - 03/25/11 10:20 AM
Re: What Is Roland Up To ? -- 4-6-2011
[Re: jedi]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
Boy..! There's a lot of moist panties 'round here! You can't honestly have forgotten the run-up to the VIMA launch, have you? Or several other of Roland's rather underwhelming products of late... This could be a 30W keyboard amp, for all the hype is telling us! Legendary Roland synths? Let me think... System 100 Jupiter 8 JX-3P (first Roland with MIDI) SH-101 JX-8P Juno 106 (the sound of Madonna!) D-50 MT-32 (first 'one box does it all' module) E-20 (first Roland arranger) SC-55 (first General MIDI module) Got a decent selection of 'Legends' to choose from! From Roland's current line-up, I'd say they are lacking in maybe a good General MIDI module (Sonic Cell not quite the hit the SC's were) or maybe a Juno-106 clone (for all the pop-synth stuff going on). We MIGHT get a J8 clone, but that boat already sailed with the Arturia model. I'd be pretty happy wagering it AIN'T a TOTL arranger, mind you! And, if patience is a virtue, we must be the least virtuous forum on the planet!
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#320174 - 03/25/11 09:37 PM
Re: What Is Roland Up To ? -- 4-6-2011
[Re: jedi]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/27/03
Posts: 2417
Loc: CA
|
Correction... only two of the three flash intro's showed a Saxophone. Sorry. I see though that the youtube video put up by Roland Media lists a violin. With all of those instruments and then showing a keyboard it kind of negates the idea of a Jupiter 8 scenario in my opinion. The Jupiter 8 was an analog 'synth' and from what I understand it didn't have the capability to reproduce "acoustic" instruments. Another scenario is Roland perhaps compiled a huge assortment of sampled instruments e.g. Sax, Guitar, Violin, Drums, etc., etc., and will sell a bundled assortment on either a USB drive or through download from the Roland website that can be used with various Roland keyboards that have USB and Sample memory capability. Third party vendors are already doing that for the Roland Fantom G so maybe Roland decided to get in the game themselves and could possibly turn out to be a lucrative proposition for them if indeed it's true. Multisampled instruments (if done correctly) can be of much better sound quality than what's contained in the keyboard itself. Just a theory... but since Roland is being tight lipped until 4.6.2011 we'll have to keep guessing. Obviously Roland is trying to generate interest in this "new" whatever by adding additional information every so often. Hopefully when 4.6.2011 rolls around the bubble won't suddenly burst with disappointment. Time will tell..
Edited by keybplayer (03/25/11 09:40 PM)
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Mackie HR824 MKII Studio Monitors, Mackie 1202 VLZ Pro Mixer (made in USA), Cakewalk Sonar Platinum, Shure SM58 vocal mic.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#320358 - 03/28/11 09:51 AM
Re: What Is Roland Up To ? -- 4-6-2011
[Re: abacus]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
Hi Diki
Korgs previous workstation (OASYS) was based on Linux OS for its operation, so it’s possible that that the Kronos is the same, (Particularly as all the instruments and operations mentioned are available in software) rather than a propriety hardware system as used in current hardware keyboards. (Should be interesting to see once it gets dissected)
Bill But while the underpinnings of the system might have been Linux, the Oasys didn't allow you to piggyback regular Linux apps or instruments, did it? I think what we are seeing here is a sort of hybrid between hardware synthesis generation, and perhaps a Linux-like OS to run it. Rather than the OS do everything, including the synthesis (like the MS does), the hardware does most of the work (guaranteeing polyphony count and drop-out free operation) while the OS takes care of operation and data handling. But, however it is achieved, it is the new benchmark. For working pros in studio and stage alike, bomb-proof operation is the FIRST thing needed. Unfortunately, so far, the 'pure' software instruments have struggled with this, as any combination of VSTi's can pull even a modern multi-core CPU to its knees. Using a more modern OS to handle data streaming, while hardware still takes care of much of the sound generation and manipulation seems, until maybe we have a few more CPU generations with a LOT more power, to be the more reliable route.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|