First and foremost, the price is $199, which is about $50 more than the R&R R-10. Additionally, it has solid wheels, which are not forgiving when you are wheeling gear over a rough surface.
Next, it does not fold as flat as the R&R, therefore, taking up a bit more space in the van. The handles are round, which ins't conducive to attaching a top tier. The R&R handles are squared, which made adding a top tier very easy and inexpensive.
While aluminum would be lighter, it would not have the structural integrity of steel. Consequently, it would be about 50-percent bulkier.
There is a way to make one-half of the bottom platform of the R&R into a solid platform with the addition of simple aluminum sheeting pop-riveted in place. You could also use 1/4-inch thick Luan plywood in place of the aluminum sheeting, which would be quieter and easier to work with. The difference in weight would be negligible.
I've had 2 flat tires with the R&R during the past decade. I fixed the flats with Slime, the green stuff used for emergency tire repairs. In one instance a long thorn pierced the tire. In another case it was a roofing staple. While solid tires would prevent flats, the vibration on sidewalks and mcadam surfaces would be horrendous.
I don't see the above cart as a viable replacement for the Rock & Roller R-10, but that's only my point of view.
Gary
......it's time for a change....
go figure
....but comon, when are they ever gonna improve the design, like a release trigger on top of the side bar so you don't have to bend down...etc,?..all the did was change the color and add no flat wheels big deal.....I also like these models shown..I'm thinking of which one will suit my daily transport needs....btw thank you kind sir it's good to be back with everyone also....
Previous Topic
Index