|
|
|
|
|
|
#345870 - 06/19/12 10:22 PM
Re: You LIKE me...now what?
[Re: 124]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/04/01
Posts: 2071
Loc: Fruita, Colorado, USA
|
One more comment to 124. Do yourself a big big favor if you're serious about learning, and buy the "Real Fake Book" the "jazz version. Google for it. Start with the simple tunes and as you progress work with the more complicated songs.
Purchase the plain simple version of BIAB. Type the chords in and play along after you get a bit familiar with a few songs in the fake book.
It would take Russ 150 years to teach you on this forum what you will learn in a month with the fake book if you know how a chord is structured. If you don't know how to build a chord, you’ll need to learn to play the scale and go up a second octave and find the 9th note the 11th note the 13th note so on and so forth. Then you’ll understand how a chord is structured and it will be easier to figure out the b9, #9, b5, #5 etc.
For example, for C9 play C, E, G and D. . . for C79 add the Bb for the dominate 7th or B natural for a CM7,9. Incidentally usually when you see C9 most of the time it will call for the dominant or the flatted 7th if that’s what you want to call it.
Forget about inversions, rootless chords etc. until you learn how to form a straight up chord. You can learn the inversions, rootless and such after you began to understand chord structure. You have to learn how to form the chords first. You can’t run until you learn to walk right?
I don't know any other simpler way to explain this. I taught a friend this theory almost 40 years ago in 8 hours in one day. The next day he is not a pianist, but he’s singing and playing the chords to “I Left My Heart In SF.” He figured it out on his own just after he understood basic chord structure. He wasn't a rocket scientist and only had a little knowledge playing a trumpet and he didn't do that very well.
I always claimed that if you can count to 13 and you’re really interested, I can teach you this at a piano in a very short time.
In western style music, ( I’m not talking country music), there are only 13 notes. So, in reality then you just start talking another octave. This is really pretty simple if you figure it out mathematically.
This system will not work if you want to be a concert pianist. If that’s the case forget what I said here and hire a great concert pianist to teach you. Warning if you do the concert pianist thing, hire a teacher and learn to read music, there’s a more than 90% chance you won’t be able to jam. Usually at a jam session there isn’t any sheet music available.
If you can't count to 13 then you're hopeless. Ha ha! (Pun intended.) I hadn't met any one lately who couldn't count to 13.
If anyone wants to, please email me. I don’t know everything neither does anyone else. I’m willing to share what I am able to share. Thanks for putting up with me again.
_________________________
I'm not prejudiced, I hate everybody!! Ha ha! My Sister-In-Law had this tee shirt. She was a riot!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345872 - 06/20/12 01:21 AM
Re: You LIKE me...now what?
[Re: Scottyee]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/30/06
Posts: 3944
|
My two cents (for what it's worth) . . .
When I first joined Synthzone over 12 years ago, I too had hoped the discussions included more about music theory (scales, chords, chord progressions, chord substitutions, chord extensions, on bass/pedal, arranger orchestration, etc), as well as arranger keyboard specific "playing" technique. When I initially brought up rootless jazz chord voicings, I was poo-poo'ed and even accused by a few members of coming off like an elitist snob, so gave up any idea of this place being anything else other than an informative, and often combative 'gear debate' forum. I suspect the reason could be the membership's extreme variance of music background, experience, and education. I also discovered early on that being a 'Pro' musician here doesn't necessarily reflect one's musicianship skill level.
I for one want to continually improve as a musician, so it will be interesting to find out how many others here are really seriously interested in becoming better arranger keyboard players, or simply content maintaining the status quo, whatever level it may currently be (from beginner to advanced). Scott, I may have to admit I ain't going to get much better than I am now on account of my brain being overloaded, in short I am learnt up. I might even be slipping backwards down the hill, and over it. Tony
_________________________
Tyros 4/Pair SR 350/ PC with a i8 intel chip, XENYX 802, Ford Focus 2 litre/Tascam DR07/Brother printer/Designjet 500/ our Doris/5 Grandchildren/ white boxers short Kymart shipped over and Typhoo Tea Earl Grey
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345883 - 06/20/12 09:10 AM
Re: You LIKE me...now what?
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/02/04
Posts: 7305
Loc: Lexington, Ky, USA
|
Let's face it...for most OMB players, a discussion of chord substitutions is going to be of marginal interest. After all, as Chas reminds us, we're talking arrangers here...and the limitations thereof. I do remember the valiant effort Scotty made with his early support of rootless chords on arrangers and the corresponding lack of interest or even understanding of the subject.
I think what would be useful is a response to posts suggesting appropriate chord substitutions/improvements. That way, the contributor would hear options suggested for the purpose of making the performance better.
This, of course, is not going to work with the submissions I was referencing at the start of this thread...just plain bad work.
I guess my answer to my own question is just don't say anything about the really bad posts. For others, something like,"Good effort. Have you tried ......(a description of a possible fix/improvement)"?
I think I'm done here, folks. Thanks for the well thought out responses to what could have been a pretty volatile thread.
You folks are GREAT!
R.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#345891 - 06/20/12 01:53 PM
Re: You LIKE me...now what?
[Re: brickboo]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/01/09
Posts: 2195
|
One more comment to 124. Do yourself a big big favor if you're serious about learning, and buy the "Real Fake Book" the "jazz version. Google for it. Start with the simple tunes and as you progress work with the more complicated songs.
Purchase the plain simple version of BIAB. Type the chords in and play along after you get a bit familiar with a few songs in the fake book.
It would take Russ 150 years to teach you on this forum what you will learn in a month with the fake book if you know how a chord is structured. If you don't know how to build a chord, you’ll need to learn to play the scale and go up a second octave and find the 9th note the 11th note the 13th note so on and so forth. Then you’ll understand how a chord is structured and it will be easier to figure out the b9, #9, b5, #5 etc.
For example, for C9 play C, E, G and D. . . for C79 add the Bb for the dominate 7th or B natural for a CM7,9. Incidentally usually when you see C9 most of the time it will call for the dominant or the flatted 7th if that’s what you want to call it.
Forget about inversions, rootless chords etc. until you learn how to form a straight up chord. You can learn the inversions, rootless and such after you began to understand chord structure. You have to learn how to form the chords first. You can’t run until you learn to walk right?
I don't know any other simpler way to explain this. I taught a friend this theory almost 40 years ago in 8 hours in one day. The next day he is not a pianist, but he’s singing and playing the chords to “I Left My Heart In SF.” He figured it out on his own just after he understood basic chord structure. He wasn't a rocket scientist and only had a little knowledge playing a trumpet and he didn't do that very well.
I always claimed that if you can count to 13 and you’re really interested, I can teach you this at a piano in a very short time.
In western style music, ( I’m not talking country music), there are only 13 notes. So, in reality then you just start talking another octave. This is really pretty simple if you figure it out mathematically.
This system will not work if you want to be a concert pianist. If that’s the case forget what I said here and hire a great concert pianist to teach you. Warning if you do the concert pianist thing, hire a teacher and learn to read music, there’s a more than 90% chance you won’t be able to jam. Usually at a jam session there isn’t any sheet music available.
If you can't count to 13 then you're hopeless. Ha ha! (Pun intended.) I hadn't met any one lately who couldn't count to 13.
If anyone wants to, please email me. I don’t know everything neither does anyone else. I’m willing to share what I am able to share. Thanks for putting up with me again. Boo, thank you for taking the time to type all that information. It will be helpful to many. It's often difficult in a words-only format, such as a web forum, to put across what's relevant and what's not. There's no way you could have known from my previous post of where I'm at musically. So, just for the record, I'm familiar with 7th's, 9th's, 11th's, 13th's, etc., flattened and so on, augs, dims, inversions of same, slash chords, even on some (certainly not as many as I'd like) jazz standards, which is an area I'd like to expand. The greater challenge for me, I think, is not so much how those chords are constructed, I seem to manage them quite well, but on where to use them. I think I may be talking substitutions here, and I'm particularly interested in 'passing' chords. This may all be a matter of trial and error for me? As for following charts, fakebook or otherwise, it seems to me that a reasonable knowledge of music is still required. I'm a totally self-taught player, for better or worse. On some sheet music I've seen chord symbols printed that sound so wrong when played. Hmmm. Thanks again, Boo, for your reply. As Curtis Mayfield said, I goota Keep on Truckin'.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|