|
|
|
|
|
|
#349647 - 08/24/12 02:04 PM
So, I bought a Roland BA-330 Personal PA...
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/03
Posts: 3748
Loc: Motown
|
...and to my surpeise it really kicks a$$. I was able to get myself an open-box unit for $399; it's in brand new condition with the warranty and all. Not surprisingly, the unit is quite portable AND built like a tank.
Sonically, it's a very good sounding piece of equipment. I plugged my s910 into it in stereo, something I never do with my Compact. I can't say that I noticed anything different in that category, but then again I had the amp set about 10ft to my left side. What I did notice was that the keyboards were a bit clearer and had a little more definition than I hear with the Bose. I decided to run my mic directly into the Roland instead of the keyboard. I liked what I heard most of the time.
I'm pretty much judging the BA-330 against my L1 Compact. Let me say that I 'think' I still prefer the Bose. Why? Sound dispersion is supeior in the Compact. The very first comment I heard today was from some crochety old woman who said, loud enough to be heard, "this is too loud." Mind you, if I heard that comment about my Bose with the volumes set the way I had them today, I'd say it was only her crabbiness. But because I had a new setup, I was a bit more cautious.
I do have to say that the Roland has that traditional out front sound, and it sounds terrific, but it's not a Bose sound. I think the sound quality is very close, but again I think the Bose disperses the sound better while the Roland has an excellent traditional PA sound. I feel I need to be more cautious when setting the dials for the Ba-330 so I don't run into chippiness or boominess, problems I rarely run ito with the Compact.
In all, I'm much impressed with BA-330. I ran it very conservatively and got a much better than expected sound. It's way better than the CM-30s or the PW-50's I have used - AND, it's one unit (which I like). For $400-600, this is a no brainer for anyone who plays small rooms. And judging from Frankieve's HK-Nano review, this is still the better bang for the buck. I look forward to using it again and fine tuning the sound to make it even better.
Ps- I didn't really buy this unit to replace my Bose Compact. I actually bought it as a back up and as something to keep on hand at church for those rare moments when I need a small, versatile amp. But now the BA-330's sound has given me pause. I now have the dilema of which small PA to use. Luckily, I can't go wrong with either choice.
Edited by cassp (08/24/12 02:34 PM) Edit Reason: accuracy check
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349666 - 08/24/12 09:00 PM
Re: So, I bought a Roland BA-330 Personal PA...
[Re: cassp]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/21/03
Posts: 3748
Loc: Motown
|
Paul, I think I could have easily used it as a personal monitor with my sax, guitar, keyboard trio. The BA is surprisingly strong (loud) for being 30 watts. Today's technology produces some exciting noise. I considered a powered 12" two-way, but would probably have to add a mixer (for OMB work). As Donny said, the unit is very versatile: stereo, 4(6) channels with reverb/delay, lots of in/outs AND all in a single unit weighing under 30 lbs. The fact that it angles up easily or can be mounted on a speaker pole makes it all the more versatile. The best advice I can give is to compare it yourself, if you can. I bought mine sight unseen based on SZ and other reviews only, but then again my needs are somewhat different than yours. 1) It is a good sounding, strong and versatile unit. 2) It is not made for large spaces, but can be linked to other equipment easily. Good luck.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|