|
|
|
|
|
|
#349762 - 08/27/12 12:55 PM
New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349790 - 08/27/12 08:05 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: Dnj]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/15/01
Posts: 1314
Loc: london,ontario.canada
|
This looks interesting.Now with the design, I don't know how good they will sound.
Now, 2000w?
If they deliver 1000w it's a lot.I have tried other qsc,jbl,ev that claim 1000w and they are now even close. But they are nice speakers,especially JBL prx600 series.
Time will show about Mackies. I do like that they have 1.75 inch driver.
Has anyone tried mackie dl1602 digital mixer?
_________________________
MIKIMIKI
TYROS 5,BEHRINGER X32PRODUCER,YAMAHA DSR112,JBL PRX618s XLF,EV ZLX12p,SENNHEISER E945,....ETC
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349792 - 08/27/12 11:08 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: frankieve]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
I think a lot depends more on the efficiency of the speakers than how many watts they have driving them. ClassD amps, on the whole, don't deliver the sheer oomph that ClassA or A/B amps do (the traditional, heavy transformer types), so 2000W isn't QUITE what you would expect. Plus, Mackie make no detailed specs available yet, so 2000W at what %THD? RMS or peak?
We don't know yet. They may very well need 2000W at their specs to equal 1000W of JBL or QSC (who tend to be much more 'techie' with their spec data) power, we don't really know yet. Peak volume seems to be comparable to QSC's K series (the 10" QSC's peak volume is about the same as the Mackie 12", so where all that extra power is going, I don't know). But interestingly, the QSC's claim only 1000W continuous, but 2000W peak, so this may be a more accurate indication of what the Mackie's true power output is at.
The QSC's (which a few friend's have, and I have heard and played through) interestingly also have a 1.75" horn diaphragm, so you may very well be looking at Mackie's answer to the K-Series QSC's. If the Mackie's compare sonically with the QSC's, which are among my favorite small, powerful speakers at the moment, as the price is similar, they may have a winner.
But still rather more than most here really need...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349820 - 08/28/12 01:43 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: frankieve]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
Mackies of course are not shipping yet so there isn't a way to know how they will sound. They are taking stuff from their EAW line and using it in the Mackie lines.
The one thing that really stands out above the size, is that they are a co-ax design, which has always sounded better than a traditional horn and woofer. The number game does look like it's being played here too.
I carry Yamaha DXR and DSR lines HK Audio Elements FBT and RCF.
The new Yamaha DXR are a direct competitor with the QSC K boxes, but with a slightly lower price point. I have A/B'd them both, and for the less money, the DXR wins
the HK Elements does the portable line array set-up that can be scaled to what you need.
But I think Mackie might be on to something, they kept the price very competitive and with new ideas, as long as the sound is good, and they are reliable, I expect to sell allot of these guys.
I should be getting my order of DL series mixers in the next couple of weeks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349833 - 08/28/12 07:31 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: Bill Lewis]
|
Member
Registered: 04/26/11
Posts: 648
Loc: Lebanon, PA
|
Just curious, what were you running through those Yamaha DXR10's ? I like them because of the built in 3 channel mixer and stereo link feature. Plus yamaha quality. Thanks
Bill... Here was my set up for the wedding reception on Saturday. Signal Chain... Yamaha Motif ES7 - Piano Sounds and Full Sequences Sonar VS-100 - WAV files on SD playing sequences from older workstations CD Player iPod from the Bride Apple Mac Book Pro running iTunes using a Tascam US-122 Interface Shure Beta58a Male vocal (me) Audio Technica 3000 series wireless vocal (my wife) Line 6 Wireless for speeches. All went into the Mackie DFX12 mixer No processors direct into the DXR10 via the XLR... one left and one right. Played all types of music through the night. Not a big dancing crowd but still played some modern dance stuff. A bunch of country line dancing songs. Those 10" little speakers did extremely well on the low end. Outdoors, I could have used a sub but it was raining off and on and the power was limited. We were under a tent but when the bass was pumping at the end, the rope light we had on faded during the kick drums. I own... RCF ART 312a (Main Speakers for big gigs) RCF ART 310a (Monitors or Main for smaller gigs) Yamaha MSR100 (Use at church for contemporary service) The RCF speakers sound great, that's why I bought them. I do need to tweek them a bit because the mid range they produce. The Yamaha DXR10 sound great on there own with out any type of processing. At $599 a box, they are the better choice over the K10. If they were available when I bought my RCF 310a, I would have picked the Yamaha DXR10. ~Johnathan
_________________________
~Johnathan "The Shueys" www.shueymusic.comYamaha Genos - RCF M20x - RCF HD10A (Stereo) - Jupiter Pocket Trumpet - Sennheiser e935 - Neumann KMS-104 plus-N
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349914 - 08/29/12 05:12 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: frankieve]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
But $500 or so for each iPad... a traditional mixer would be vastly cheaper.
And iPads still don't multitask... You use one for the mixer, you can't use it for your lyric displays, or the Garage Band loop playback, or the MP3 player, or the synth app, etc..
I still don't have one of these. I think they need to get quite a bit more powerful before I do. That's a lot of dough to tie up in something that can't do two things at a time!
Plus, the DLM's only have TWO inputs. That's perhaps OK if you are a solo act with the barest minimum of needs. Saying they have a 'digital mixer' built in seems a bit of a stretch. A 2 channel digital mixer, maybe. But who has ever bought a TWO channel mixer?! Anyone joins you onstage, you are screwed!
A good idea, poorly executed, IMO.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349920 - 08/29/12 06:47 PM
Re: New Mackie Loudspeakers, coaxil design
[Re: frankieve]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/24/99
Posts: 1675
Loc: Milford, CT, USA
|
I use my ipad for lyrics/lead sheets, and qmix my PreSonus Studiolive mixer at the same time, so yes they can multi-task.
With the new Mackie DL mixer, you can do the same, once the ipad is removed from the DL and a wifi router is connected, you can wirelessly mix, even without a wireless, it can be removed and all settings stay at the last position
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|