|
|
|
|
|
|
#353177 - 10/20/12 12:42 PM
Re: Guess what I've just got
[Re: Saswick]
|
Member
Registered: 01/05/01
Posts: 875
Loc: Garstang, Preston, Lancashire,...
|
Hi George I think yours was in the showroom boxed up ready to go. Hi the rest of you gents I'll do my best to answer as much as Ican but at the moment I an still finding a few set up items. I owned the Pa800 and the Pa2x previously and there are some differences I found up to now. The first thing I noticed is the lack of buttons, so much more is achieved using the touch screen. The fills work in a similar manner to the tyros if the auto fill is ON reselecting the current variation triggers the corresponding fill if the next variation is selected the corresponding fill is triggered, simpler than the previous models with no dedicated fill buttons but easier to use. The screen is vast improvement from the pa2x it is very clear and responds very quickly. I am using an external harminizer and in previous models the master volume did not effect the line inputs the Pa600 does and once again a small change but a big improvement for live use. The master EQ seems to be very comprehensive with a set of presets for different styles of music. There is also a separate limiter once again with a set of presets. The EQ and limiter seem to bear a strong resemblence to the pa3x Waves Maxx screen. I have loaded a few of the Pa3x styles in and up to now they work well, no probs as yet. (A real bonus) I'm wading my way through as much as I can (Thankfully I am familiar with the way the Korg Keyboards function) I only refered to the manual a couple of times (up to now) I will post more info as I go along. Bye for now Kind Regards Col
Edited by Saswick (10/20/12 12:59 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353178 - 10/20/12 12:51 PM
Re: Guess what I've just got
[Re: Saswick]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
Listening to the sound and style demos at Korg UK, the PA-600 sounds terrific.
Are there any FreePlay styles (ability to play without fixed tempo) on-board, or available through Korg?
Excellent DNC sounds...again, very nice upgrade from PA-500.
All this, and a Chord Sequencer too. Awesome!
Just a question (perhaps you can answer this, Dennis?)...why is the EC-5 pedal, which is not an option, needed for smooth Chord Sequencer operation?
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353196 - 10/21/12 12:52 AM
Re: Guess what I've just got
[Re: miden]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
Ian it is because the CS needs a double button press to start recording, and again to stop, and if you do not time the presses to be concurrent ( and it IS pretty fussy on the timing, believe me ), it does not start recording... I wonder if that fussiness can be corrected, or greatly diminished, by an OS upgrade? We had an issue with the sync-start not engaging properly on the midi recorder (Tyros3) that was remedied with an update, so maybe the PA-600 can be fixed similarly? Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353234 - 10/21/12 11:44 AM
Re: Guess what I've just got
[Re: Saswick]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14266
Loc: NW Florida
|
I agree. The problem is that bringing this arranger concept to a set of players that have never had it before, and then making it unnecessarily complicated tends to ensure that it won't become a go to feature, and may eventually get dropped.
TBH, I am not sure that the reason Roland dropped the feature was, they kept placing the buttons for it FAR away from the keybed, and may have made it 'out of sight, out of mind' for the majority of Roland players. And it never was an FC-7 option...
But I think I disagree with moving the CS touch screen buttons to the Marker page. Having them front and center (ok, front and edges!) on the Main Page makes them more likely to be used, and more likely to be convenient to the player. Anything that moves you off the main page tend to be a more marginal function.
I still think that re-naming the function the 'Third Hand' makes the concept more understandable to the average player. 'Sequencer' simply brings too many associative impressions to mind, and I still find myself having to explain, time after time, that the CS is NOT a 'Chord Track' like older arrangers used to have.
If you have any email addresses for the development team at Korg, forward them to me, please. Perhaps I can articulate a good reason for them to improve this?
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|