|
|
|
|
|
|
#378443 - 12/17/13 08:15 AM
Re: Whats wrong with the BK9
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 10606
Loc: Cape Breton Island, Canada
|
I think this topic was bound to come up, and is very interesting, but I'm wondering why the OP (Bachus), who considers the BK-9 such a good buy, chose to pass on it?
Personally, I was quite surprised the BK-9 didn't do better sales wise, at least here on SZ, and I'm sure I wasn't the only one who felt that way.
It does appear to have a lot going for it, especially considering the relatively modest price, it's great feature content, and the fact that it's sporting 76 keys.
According to a poll we took here on SZ, approximately 50% (or more) thought that their next (or the next) arranger should have 76 keys, and of course, be lightweight, have all the important features, and be reasonably priced as well.
There were also a few that suggested that Yamaha should make a 76 note PSR (based on the S9** series) or Roland should come out with a more lightweight version of their venerable G-70.
Instead Yamaha decides to give us a 76 note top of the line arranger (and no 76 PSR), but when Roland, more accurately following the poll's wish-list here on SZ, finally comes out with a "little gem" as Diki calls it, the interest level was considerably lower than expected (at least by me).
It even has the much vaunted and wanted "chord sequencer", that was also on the wish-list of several in the poll.
So far, a few here bought or tried a BK-9, yet returned it or sold it (or tried to sell it)...a few have kept it, but are looking to replace it with a Tyros4-76 or a Korg PA3xPro, and, of course, there are those who have decided it is exactly what they need for their arranger duties.
As far as I could tell, most of those not keeping the instrument (or considering replacing it) were either pros and/or advanced players.
One or two that passed on it were (and still are) strong Roland supporters.
Of course, this is just among active SZ members, and may not reflect what's happening elsewhere.
It would also be interesting to see that poll again (I can't seem to find it...maybe someone can?) and get an idea of what the wants were then, versus, the wants we have now.
In my case, a 76 note arranger didn't interest me in the slightest, and still doesn't, but I do consider Roland's effort to give arranger players what they were asking for (especially in the SZ poll) more than just a slight success...I think think they hit the target dead on.
Or, maybe the target changed (or was made smaller) in the ensuing time since the poll was done?
Ian
_________________________
Yamaha Tyros4, Yamaha MS-60S Powered Monitors(2), Yamaha CS-01, Yamaha TQ-5, Yamaha PSR-S775.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378447 - 12/17/13 09:47 AM
Re: Whats wrong with the BK9
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/27/08
Posts: 2403
Loc: Texas
|
I have had my BK-9 now since they first came out. Have had a lot of fun with it and when I use it on gigs my audiences tell me they really like it because they can feel the rhythm of the songs. The more I experiment with it the more I tend to like the thing - kind of a love -hate relationship. The OS is a mountain to climb compared to other keyboards I have owned but eventually it seems to fall into place. I don't like the fact that a lot of "tweaking" is needed - even to get some of the voices right. Seems the Roland folks have never sat next to great instrument players. Oh well, maybe it is just me.
What has truly surprised me is the complete lack of interest in the BK-9. I have been trying to sell mine now for about 2 months on Cragslist, Ebay, and several forums and have yet to get a serious offer. Oh, if I wanted to sell it for HALF of what I paid for it I guess you could say I got serious offers.
Anyway, I play it about everyday but that will soon come to a halt - my Tyros 5 will be delivered on Wednesday. By the way, I actually agree with what Diki posted - it isn't that the BK-9 is TOTL, MOTL, Bad, or Good - it is just really different from the Korgs and Yamaha keyboard produced today. And, Diki has a great point - if you are a typical "ARRANGER" type player, like me, the BK-9 is probably not for you. If however, you do a lot of full keyboard playing with no split it has real options not found on other keyboards.
Deane
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|