|
|
|
|
|
|
#380629 - 01/05/14 12:42 PM
Re: I am getting a new Vocal Harmonizer ...
[Re: Dnj]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 04/13/05
Posts: 5126
Loc: USA
|
Tony, Hey, why did I know that you bought the PA900 Best of luck and congratulations with the PA900, look forward to getting to your place to check it out soon! Steve how does the T5 compare to your T4 so far? and hows your first week retired? Donny, I finally picked up the T5-76 yesterday. I was one of the last to place and order with Frank, I think I was something like #41 in line to receive one. I was supposed to get it a week ago but the delivery was delayed I believe due to weather. Frank was telling me these boards aren't shippped via UPS or Fedex, they are shipped by a freight company. My initial impressions without going into details is that it is sonically better sounding than the T4, plus with 76 keys it's one "beast" of a board. It's too bad Yamaha didn't produce a t4-76, I probably wouldn't have upgraded. Lots of motivation for me to upgrade was the 76 key model., but that's not the only reason. Reminds me when I went to demo Pa3x, I was just expecting a little differen Pa2x Pro, but it was much more, again I found a sonic difference in the sound. Have to believe you Gary and others may have had a similar experience upgrading to the s950. BTW, haven't forgot about your request, but with just getting the board. You'll get some e-mail from me this week. So far the first week has been do what I want when I want to Right now taking some to chill, then later this month we have a short trip planned during the week. Florida well it's in the cards but just not at present due to some family circumstances, looks like we'll be spending a few weeks there in March. Gary, yes that escort job was right up my alley but I applied a day too late. Donny, yea you could have had it too if you applied earlier enough, better go back to check Gary's original e-mail.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#380661 - 01/05/14 01:35 PM
Re: I am getting a new Vocal Harmonizer ...
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Be interesting to have a comparison between PA2X and PA3X, and T4 and T5, but with ALL the mastering compression and EQ turned off.
Personally, I believe a lot of what many people hear as an initial change in overall sound boils down to different Mastering settings...
The best way to see if there really IS any real difference would be to play the same style through each. After all, probably MOST of what we end up playing on a new arranger is still the styles we have got used to, or SMF's we have tweaked to be their best on the old arranger. If there really IS an overall change in sound quality, should be apparent without the mastering EQ and compression.
Then listen to the two arrangers playing the same style with the default Mastering settings for each... NOW is there a perceived difference? If so, you can probably get most of what appears to be the new arranger's improvement by simply using the new Mastering settings on the old instrument.
Sure, this doesn't account for new sounds used in new styles, but, as I said, quite likely most of us don't redo our songbook 100% to always use the best of what's new...
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|