|
|
|
|
|
|
#380935 - 01/08/14 03:11 PM
Re: Midjay, Midjay Plus vs. BK7m
[Re: Jerry T]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14269
Loc: NW Florida
|
You are comparing two things at very different prices, though. BK-7m can be got for under $1000 new, as far as I can tell, Midjay Plus is about $1700, right (new)?
I like my BK-7m, but think there's a few things the OS needs (that have been added to the BK-9 OS). First is the Mark/Jump for SMF's (if you aren't using this, you aren't getting the most out of your SMF's), second is the Dynamic Arranger (backing gets louder or quieter depending on your playing dynamics), and lastly, it needs the BK Performance editor iPad app to work with it.
Hopefully, Roland can update the OS for these things rather than a new model...
For more forward looking arranger players, a decent WS (Motif, Krone, etc.) married to a BK-7m is quite a potent combination.
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#380943 - 01/08/14 03:33 PM
Re: Midjay, Midjay Plus vs. BK7m
[Re: Jerry T]
|
rosetree
Unregistered
|
Regarding the sounds of the Midjay Plus, do you know these demos? http://www.ketron.com/sounds.asp?mod=MIDJAY Plus http://www.ketron.com/sounds.asp?mod=SD2The second link is for the SD2, but the sounds of SD 2 and Midjay Plus are absolutely identical (statement from Ketron). I own a BK-7m, all in all its sounds are really good, some are great. Strings and acoustic guitars are rather average. IMO, from what I hear in the demos,in some cases Ketron has an (slight) edge over the BK-7m (maybe some trumpets, saxophones, large strings, acoustic guitar, maybe also drums), but for other instruments it might be vice versa, and the BK-7m has a wider choice of sounds. Given the price difference, the BK-7m seems to have a much better value for money.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|