Just for the heck of it this morning before my gig I took another attempt to adjust the VH2 setting in the S950 of which up to this time 1 yr+ was useless to me for so many reasons. On the suggestion of a friend I tried to follow all the settings given in this You Tube Video explained by Robbiedoes.nl ... just stop the video make changes & continue till your done then save and name file. Then assign to whatever registrations needed. It will also work on T4, etc,..I followed ALL his recommendations exactly, ....EXCEPT I changed his Chordal selection 3Abv.Jazz.....to 3Abv.Chordal.... and his Vocal Effect Type 80sPOP Rev to R&R Delay..w/ 16 rev. This made a BIG difference in chord/vocal tracking your voice.
I might even use the VH again when I'm performing with just the keyboard on small gigs......it's no TC Helicon,.. But now tracking is possibly acceptable for light duty gigs.
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
I was pretty pleased with the harmony on the S950 after I tweaked it a little. It is easy to work with, but adjusting and saving things are different from previous Yamahas.
I was pretty pleased with the harmony on the S950 after I tweaked it a little. It is easy to work with, but adjusting and saving things are different from previous Yamahas.
Amazing how much tweaking you have to KNOW How to do before you can get a decent tracking VH on the S950 as the default types really are less then stellar for sure for a pro singer. KORG made a great choice in including a TC Helicon unit in their arrangers......Yamaha should take note ASAP
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
Here are two versions of Feels So Right I just recorded on the S-950, one of which using the TC Helicon Harmony-M vocal harmonizer and the other using the onboard harmonizer. You guess which one is which and post your answers.
Personally, I don't think there's a hill of beans difference between the two of them, but what the Hell, I'm old and deaf so that's why your opinions count here.
Now, I would like to hear the same song, done by owners of other arranger keyboards with onboard vocal processors as well, Korg, Roland, etc...
Cheers,
Gary
Edited by travlin'easy (04/21/1411:46 AM)
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
I'm saying first version is T.C. Helicon and second is 950. I think the vocal sounds better on the second and the harmony on first seems clearer. Both are very good.
I say it's the other way around, s950 first and TC-M second. I thought I heard a little bit of synthesis on #1. #2 seemed smoother. Hurry and tell us, Gary. I have both units and don't use either, but have been thinking of giving one a spin.
_________________________
Riding on the Avenue of Time cassp50@gmail.com
Registered: 06/25/99
Posts: 16735
Loc: Benton, LA, USA
I have a TC Helicon Harmony M for sale. I ordered it when I trying the BK9, which has no harmonizer. I hooked it up and tried it once at home, then decided against keeping the BK9, so it's "new". I'll take $100. plus shipping.
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 12800
Loc: Penn Yan, NY
The second harmony is so buried in the mix, it's not easy to compare, but if I had to guess based on response - I'd go TC first then 950 second. Both pale to the upgraded brain that the 800/900/3x have, but, as always - nice job Gary.
_________________________
No longer monitoring this forum. Please visit www.daveboydmusic.com for contact info