I think you mixed up the Nano 600 specs with the db K300, which I just suggested as a complement to a Nano 300.
regarding the db K300 I assumed that these might be available in the US.
The K300 price of 330€ for 120 Watts: well, the pair is 660€ for 240 Watts, which is pretty much the same ratio as the Nano 300 and therefore not too expensive. And I've learned not to completely trust wattage data, even if it is RMS.. The speakers sounded nearly as strong (and clearer) as the JBL Eon 510, which are rated 280 Watts.
But I admit Nano 600 would probably be easier to set up and still as a rather low weight, but soundwise I would recommend the combination Nano 300 + db K300 for the sake of very clear mid frequencies e.g.for brilliant piano sound.

Thanks for all the info … fyi, the Nano 600 is not 120W, I think it's 430Watts. When I mentioned 120 I was talking about US voltage (United States A/C power being 120V/60Hz power). Yes there are plenty of great speakers avail in the US, and I have several of them … I just like the Nano "form factor" and thought the Nanao 600 might be great for certain kinds of situations. They are not a "must-have" for me, but if I wanted them, I was hoping to find a way to get them …

Thanks again for the ideas/suggestions etc.!
-Jim

I'm not real happy with the piano sounds on my PA3x. So......why does correct amplification "make a piano patch sound better in the mid-range?" Zuki mentioned that in a recent post also. I understand how frequency response works, I just don't understand the speaker/piano sound interaction?

P.S. I like the way you review equipment.....very thorough and very descriptive.

Mark

I can't explain this in any scientific way, I just think the frequencies between 200 and maybe 2000 Hz seem to be very important for piano waveforms to be fully transmitted. And if you look at how the speakers are designed, it isn't surprising that two db K300 speakers deliver more mid frequencies than a system like the Nano 300 or Bose Compact. The K300 have two 6.5 inch speakers each, whereas the Nano 300 has a subwoofer for very low frequencies and two 3.5 inch speakers with an emphasis on high frequencies. So I guess the K300 put more emphasis on the mid range.

Hi - I'm hoping that the Nano 600 will be better in this area. The Nano 600 is different than the 300 in that its "tops" (small/satellite speakers) have 2 speakers, I think a 4.5" midrange and a 1" tweeter. So I'm hoping that the Nano 600 will have better sound balance (and more power) as compared to the Nano 300.

We'll have to see how it fares when people start buying and reviewing the Nano 600 ...

-Jim