|
|
|
|
|
|
#3999 - 10/29/02 11:43 AM
The Death of File Sharing
|
Member
Registered: 02/12/01
Posts: 525
Loc: Scotland
|
As we all know, Napster went down the tubes a long time ago, and more recently even Morpheus seems to be pretty useless too.
Now, I suppose I don't want to get into some kind of debate about the morals of whether it's right or wrong to download MP3s. In my case, I would certainly have to plead guilty as charged. In my defence however, I can honestly say that 99.9% of the MP3s I've ever downloaded have been really obscure files that are virtually impossible to get a hold of any other way.
Today I downloaded and tried out WinMX. Although I found people who had the files, it wouldn't download from them cos it kept saying I'm in a que.
Folks, I hate to say it, but the punchline of my thread is this... the days of hastle free file downloading are GONE!
I mean, just think about the main players. * Napster- DEAD. * Kazza- Frought with spyware and trojans. * WinMX- Leach City (i.e.- people who won't share what they have but are always eager to feed off other people) * Audio Galaxy- never tried it, but I've heard that it also has some very malicious spyware. * Morpheus- a shambles. Poor results, ad's everywhere, pop ups galore and recent reports suggest it TOO is now frought with spyware.
It looks like the faceless major labels have ended up winning after all.
Not one... and I'll say that again... NOT ONE single solitary act has ever made it big through the Internet. Years have passed and we're STILL getting force fed the same CRAP that they've been giving us for oh so long; boy bands, girl bands, T.V. competitions, regurgitated covers, soap stars, phonies, teeny boppers, on stage miming, faceless fat cats, nepotism of the highest order.... it all makes me wanna PUKE!!!
I'm totally disappointed with the Net in general and I just wanted to share that with you.
[This message has been edited by Equalizer (edited 10-29-2002).]
_________________________
David
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4004 - 10/30/02 12:31 AM
Re: The Death of File Sharing
|
Member
Registered: 01/23/99
Posts: 523
Loc: Racine, Wisconsin USA
|
Jiddu,
that quote was from months ago regarding TiVo and the like... he later recanted it and said he meant it as a "metaphor" or something.
But his point is interesting... basically, if the ability to skip commercials becomes commonplace, airtime will become less valuable, which means networks and the like would end up charging less for commercial airtime and therefore have less of a budget to put into programming. His worse case scenario involved airtime being worthless, therefor people would have to subscribe to each network individually, which he claimed would cost up around $200 per channel per month. I think this last point is bullshit on his part, I mean, I can get 6 channels of HBO/cinemax for $50 a month, and in the case of HBO, one can argue their original programming is of a higher quality than that of the networks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|