|
|
|
|
|
|
#410703 - 11/02/15 07:51 PM
Re: Hope for new orchestral sound modules?
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Regarding the Kronos, yes, I would consider its expansions as the closest (at least technically) to software libraries you can get on a synth, I just recommended someone to have a look at it - for me personally, it would mean to give up the lightweight MoXF and carry a 13.9 kilogram keyboard to each church wedding. That's why I'm so crazy about a module. With respect to this specific demo and expansion, I'm not sure... the demo boasts so much with gigantic percussion sounds and octaved strings with a strong-vibrato solo violin on top of it, I'd rather want to hear how a plain Beethoven symphony would sound with it in order to be sure how realistic it really is. In that respect, I like the Kurzweil examples Mikem posted even better - even if this is not up-to-date technology, and there are some details where you hear it: the very high string section tones do sound somewhat synthetic, the piano is sub-standard, and at one point I heard a not-so-perfect trumpet. Kurzweil have certainly also rested on their laurels too long... Actually I think the Roland SRX 04 and 10 largely live up to these Kurzweil sounds (SRX 10 probably exceeds them), Roland woodwinds might be a bit worse, but IMO it's more a question of how much detail you put into the sequencer tracks. Rosetree, I trust your judgment and your ears. If you say that the SRX-04 and SRX-10 "largely live up to these Kurzweil sounds", I believe you. Getting a Roland Integra-7 is certainly cheaper than a PC3K/A, so I'll certainly keep this in mind when I'm ready to buy. Thanks for your feedback.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#410729 - 11/03/15 11:39 AM
Re: Hope for new orchestral sound modules?
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Rosetree, I trust your judgment and your ears. If you say that the SRX-04 and SRX-10 "largely live up to these Kurzweil sounds", I believe you. Getting a Roland Integra-7 is certainly cheaper than a PC3K/A, so I'll certainly keep this in mind when I'm ready to buy. Well, thanks a lot for your trust, but it always remains a subjective thing. This is my impression from overhearing these demos all in all, but to be sure about the individual quality of Kurzweil sounds and the range of different samples, I would have to try a PC-3 myself and go through the voices and samples, including the available expansion(s) (I've read about KORE64). I haven't ever tried a Kurzweil in a store, so my judgment is really just based on these demos. Sound is indeed subjective. For example, I've read many people say they just love the Tyros 5. Others instead, say it's garbage. How does one reconcile these opposing opinions? You absolutely have to try a keyboard for yourself. Everyone has different ears, needs and likes. I hope you get to try a Kurzweil soon. You'll be glad you did.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#410765 - 11/03/15 07:44 PM
Re: Hope for new orchestral sound modules?
[Re: ]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Unfortunately, Kurzweil has no module, and the synthesizers are much too heavy for my taste. It's really a pity. But I'm going to try a PC-3 some time, just to see what I miss. But I won't accept that weight for my gigs. About Yamaha modules - the latest one, Motif XS rack, is SO MUCH poorer than the Integra, there's just no comparison. The MoX had exactly the same soundset, poor string sections, poor artificial French horns etc., and no sample expandibility. I'm not crazy about my Motif XF's strings, in general. That's why I want a piece of gear for that. My 3 options are: 1) Kurzweil PC3k/A 2) Roland Integra-7 3) Motif XF sound libraries, like, "Garritan", and "Digital Sound Factory Symphonic Strings". Unless, the Motif's replacement is revealed soon with great string and orchestral sounds.
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|