|
|
|
|
|
|
#412575 - 12/05/15 02:33 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
Well John, now we are both better off. I got confirmation from Donny and Don, and you got caught up in it. A win win situation. Stay well my friend.
Edited by Bernie9 (12/05/15 02:33 PM)
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#412576 - 12/05/15 02:40 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: tony mads usa]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/08/02
Posts: 15576
Loc: Forest Hill, MD USA
|
But, with all those attributes, it still doesn't even come remotely close to the PSR-S970 when it comes to sound quality and styles - at least not from what I've heard. Of course, I'm deaf as a post, so it doesn't make any difference. Who knows, I may be getting a good buy on a lightly used S970. Gary Gary, have you done a side by side comparison of the S970 and the PA3x and PA4x? No, all I have heard are demos of the PA3x - which are OK, but not fantastic. Of course, as you well know, demos are often poorly recorded and do not reflect the instrument quality as they should. Now, I have played older models, and to me, the grand piano voices were marginal at best, the guitars were OK, but not on par with Yamaha, while the strings and brass were underwhelming at best when compared with Yamaha. The only Korg I've ever owned was the I3, and sold it just a few months after I purchased it and bought a Yamaha PSR-5700, which was a brute, sounded great, and was quite limited in the number of styles and voices. It weighed over 50 pounds, but I was a lot younger then, so it didn't matter. I've only played a friend's S-950 for a couple hours, and it sounded incredible. Kinda like the S950 on steroids. I sincerely believe that all of today's MOTL arrangers sound really good, and there is only subtle differences between them when it comes to overall sound. As for features, we all have our personal preferences, and for the most part, the vast majority of the features are rarely, and in some instances, never used. All the best, Gary
_________________________
PSR-S950, TC Helicon Harmony-M, Digitech VR, Samson Q7, Sennheiser E855, Custom Console, and lots of other silly stuff!
K+E=W (Knowledge Plus Experience = Wisdom.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#412589 - 12/05/15 04:22 PM
Re: Migrating From PSR S10 To PSR 970
[Re: travlin'easy]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/16/02
Posts: 14376
Loc: East Greenwich RI USA
|
No, all I have heard are demos of the PA3x - which are OK, but not fantastic. Of course, as you well know, demos are often poorly recorded and do not reflect the instrument quality as they should. Now, I have played older models, and to me, the grand piano voices were marginal at best, the guitars were OK, but not on par with Yamaha, while the strings and brass were underwhelming at best when compared with Yamaha. All the best, Gary Yes, I agree ... I would never rate a keyboard - or ANY instrument - based on internet demos, nor would I judge a new instrument based on the sound of older models (I wouldn't judge a new vehicle based on the performance of older models either ) ... I also believe that the beauty of sound is in the EAR of the beholder ... and very often we stick with what we are accustomed to ...
_________________________
t.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|