|
|
|
|
|
|
#421319 - 05/15/16 03:16 PM
Santana on the Mz-X500
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#421331 - 05/16/16 06:56 AM
Re: Santana on the Mz-X500
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 05/16/09
Posts: 1415
Loc: Netherlands
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#421336 - 05/16/16 09:59 AM
Re: Santana on the Mz-X500
[Re: AlenK]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 01/14/02
Posts: 1497
Loc: Buffalo, NY
|
Edited by Jerryghr (05/16/16 10:09 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#421343 - 05/16/16 11:21 AM
Re: Santana on the Mz-X500
[Re: cgiles]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
At the risk of incurring your wrath (for disagreeing with you ), that was one of the most CRINGE-WORTHY arranger performances of a Santana tune (I love Santana, BTW) I think I've ever heard. In my opinion, this is the type of amateurish performance done on an Arranger keyboard that would drive young (6-60) musicians away from arrangers in droves. But hey, different strokes for different folks. For the record, I think it would sound equally bad on a T5 or Pa4X or SD9. That's one of my main beefs with arrangers; it makes guys with absolutely NO talent THINK they sound good. This demo will only impress immediate family. JMO. chas For the record, i agree with you on the sound Quallity... The guitar sound is okay. But not more then that. But not on how he uses the mz-x, its a matter of less is more... He is figuring out hiw way around, toying with sound and after a few minutes innthe video starts his performance... Did you continue to watch pass the initial minutes? And by the way, everyone is allowed to disagree with me based on opinions, just not when it comes to facts as you cant disagree on facts, can you?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|