|
|
|
|
|
|
#455045 - 07/21/18 03:40 AM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
I wouldn't question the accuracy of your opinion, which, in your case, probably is more than subjective. If we are to take this as fact, it still leaves other area, such as navigation, which is of paramount importance for the gigging musician. As far as features are concerned, we all have different priorities, like midi to style conversion, which is found on my Pa4x and not on the Genos. The list goes on in favor of both boards and is a matter of taste.
Having said that, I think the Genos is a vast improvement over an already top instrument, but at what cost, in terms of money and playability.
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455059 - 07/21/18 06:46 AM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: Bernie9]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
I wouldn't question the accuracy of your opinion, which, in your case, probably is more than subjective. If we are to take this as fact, it still leaves other area, such as navigation, which is of paramount importance for the gigging musician. As far as features are concerned, we all have different priorities, like midi to style conversion, which is found on my Pa4x and not on the Genos. The list goes on in favor of both boards and is a matter of taste.
Having said that, I think the Genos is a vast improvement over an already top instrument, but at what cost, in terms of money and playability. ditto Bernie NAVIGATION IS KING!....and also let's throw in player talents which makes ALL the difference no matter what Kb you play old or new,..everything that is available today will be a thing of the past in a few short years as technology speeds by as it should.
Edited by Dnj (07/21/18 07:14 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455063 - 07/21/18 07:42 AM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
You can’t really compare Bohm & Wersi to Yamaha as Bohm & Wersi are Organ first with arranger capability’s, whereas the Yamaha is Arranger first with organ sounds available, the style requirements for organ play and arranger play are different, this is why Bohm and Wersi allow you to load in Yamaha styles so that it makes it easier for arranger players to transition to organ play. (In an arranger styles are paramount, whereas in an organ they are way down the list, hence when you listen to organ players they mainly use just drums and vamp chords)
Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455088 - 07/21/18 02:20 PM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: abacus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
You can’t really compare Bohm & Wersi to Yamaha as Bohm & Wersi are Organ first with arranger capability’s, whereas the Yamaha is Arranger first with organ sounds available, the style requirements for organ play and arranger play are different, this is why Bohm and Wersi allow you to load in Yamaha styles so that it makes it easier for arranger players to transition to organ play. (In an arranger styles are paramount, whereas in an organ they are way down the list, hence when you listen to organ players they mainly use just drums and vamp chords)
Bill Styles are styles... And at 23.000 or more, one should expect better or equall styles then on a 4.000 euro instrument.. But thats just my opinion... The topic is specifically style quallity, not ease of use.. or controll interface.. And when i compare all these styles.. Genos is on top where it comes to style quallity.. And is ages ahead where it comes to (song)style availabillity and diversity.. Now, i will not buy a Genos, as my pa4x is still a great instrument, and my next arranger will either be an 88 key weighted one or a module one..
Edited by Bachus (07/21/18 02:22 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455103 - 07/22/18 06:52 AM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 07/21/05
Posts: 5386
Loc: English Riviera, UK
|
You can’t really compare Bohm & Wersi to Yamaha as Bohm & Wersi are Organ first with arranger capability’s, whereas the Yamaha is Arranger first with organ sounds available, the style requirements for organ play and arranger play are different, this is why Bohm and Wersi allow you to load in Yamaha styles so that it makes it easier for arranger players to transition to organ play. (In an arranger styles are paramount, whereas in an organ they are way down the list, hence when you listen to organ players they mainly use just drums and vamp chords)
Bill Styles are styles... And at 23.000 or more, one should expect better or equall styles then on a 4.000 euro instrument.. But thats just my opinion... The topic is specifically style quallity, not ease of use.. or controll interface.. And when i compare all these styles.. Genos is on top where it comes to style quallity.. And is ages ahead where it comes to (song)style availabillity and diversity.. Now, i will not buy a Genos, as my pa4x is still a great instrument, and my next arranger will either be an 88 key weighted one or a module one.. Yes, but as you have pointed out, there are different types of styles and the type of styles you need when playing an organ are different to the styles needed when you play an arranger. As the Bohm & Wersi are organ first and arranger second, the styles have to be designed for organ style playing. If you load in an arranger style into an organ and play the organ as it is supposed to be played, then the arranger style will sound very poor in comparison to a style designed for organ play, as it will be receiving inputs and variations (Organ play is different to arranger play) that it will not be able to deal with. If you load a style designed for organ play into an arranger, they suck, if you load an arranger style into an organ and play organ style, they also suck. Regarding arranger keyboards, I’d still just take the Korg styles over the Yamaha styles, however going back a few years I always found Roland styles ruled the roost. (How times change) Bill
_________________________
English Riviera: Live entertainment, Real Ale, Great Scenery, Great Beaches, why would anyone want to live anywhere else (I�m definitely staying put).
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455107 - 07/22/18 08:30 AM
Re: Styles Quallity
[Re: abacus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
You can’t really compare Bohm & Wersi to Yamaha as Bohm & Wersi are Organ first with arranger capability’s, whereas the Yamaha is Arranger first with organ sounds available, the style requirements for organ play and arranger play are different, this is why Bohm and Wersi allow you to load in Yamaha styles so that it makes it easier for arranger players to transition to organ play. (In an arranger styles are paramount, whereas in an organ they are way down the list, hence when you listen to organ players they mainly use just drums and vamp chords)
Bill Styles are styles... And at 23.000 or more, one should expect better or equall styles then on a 4.000 euro instrument.. But thats just my opinion... The topic is specifically style quallity, not ease of use.. or controll interface.. And when i compare all these styles.. Genos is on top where it comes to style quallity.. And is ages ahead where it comes to (song)style availabillity and diversity.. Now, i will not buy a Genos, as my pa4x is still a great instrument, and my next arranger will either be an 88 key weighted one or a module one.. Yes, but as you have pointed out, there are different types of styles and the type of styles you need when playing an organ are different to the styles needed when you play an arranger. As the Bohm & Wersi are organ first and arranger second, the styles have to be designed for organ style playing. If you load in an arranger style into an organ and play the organ as it is supposed to be played, then the arranger style will sound very poor in comparison to a style designed for organ play, as it will be receiving inputs and variations (Organ play is different to arranger play) that it will not be able to deal with. If you load a style designed for organ play into an arranger, they suck, if you load an arranger style into an organ and play organ style, they also suck. Regarding arranger keyboards, I’d still just take the Korg styles over the Yamaha styles, however going back a few years I always found Roland styles ruled the roost. (How times change) Bill We kinda disagree... Because from my pov its possible to edit an arranger style (less is more) in such a way that it works perfect for an organ... in general all you need to do is mute some tracks... For organ play, i guess, i would mostly stick to just drums, percussion and some pads and maybe a little percussion... however, the other way around does not work.. strange thing is, many Wersi owners i know..are actually arranger players that can affrod an organ.. they play layed down chords with their left hand instead of an acompaniment or a countermelody... and only use the bass pedals on the beat or so.. For those players often adding a Ketron module is the only way to get top knotch styles in their expensive organs.. even the famois Franz Lambert uses a Ketron module..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|