|
|
|
|
|
|
#464505 - 01/12/19 12:29 PM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Dnj]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
First things first...
Whenever i sit behind the Genos it gives me the feeling that i am sitting behind a majestic instrument, the screen is bigger then the pa4x, there are a lot less buttons.. but the interface of how to get somewhere fast is much much better on the Genos. . The programmable buttons and lower bar side of the screen make up for much of the missing buttons. Also the buildquallity of the Genos is high end. Even tough its plastic,
What makes a world of difference is the performance memmories on the Genos, still a pitty this is missing on pa4x, its so easy to set things up for songs, the new setlists in genos are equall to the songbook in ease of use, but because you can ... on the other hand, i loved how keyboard sets worked on the pa4x.. having sepperate save items for these makes ahuge difference, its easy to find your favorite sounds..Also i noticed that where the ots settings on pa4x are allways meant to be layered, quite a lot of settings on yamaha genos work better as single sounds.
And while i said good bye to the tyros5 more then 2 years ago, the most important feeling i got was the feeling of comming home. Genos so far feels like a warm bath.
Where it comes to sounds quallity, i personally prefer for most sounds on the Genos.. exceptions are the grand piano’s, the b3 and the synth sounds..Genos only has the typical Yamaha piano samples, these are great for cutting trough a mix, but for solo playing a darker mellower Western sample like bösendorfer or Steinway would have been very welcome..
Where it comes to styles, both instruments have top class styles.. however, the Genos styles are much more aimed at specific titles, where i found Korgs styles much kore generic and broader usefull then Yamahas.. where Yamaha scores big time is the availabillity of user created styles, and the ease of use to play these directly from a USB stick..
also the Yamaha community on psr tutorial is much more active then the korgforums.. its just like synthzone a very pleasant community to be part of, now the korg community seems much more professional in nature.. on psr tutorisl people share.. on korg forums people sell
While the keybed is top on the Genos, i prefered the pa4x even more. Its a good thing the Genos now has a stick, i prefer this above wheels..
Where it comes to playing ion the Genos, the diversity of sa sounds makes you realise that each of them requires a differnt approach when playing... on the pa4x, i was able to play most presets as i did on a piano.. yamaha presets are broader with more different articulations and require a different finesse then on the pa4x..
And then there offcourse are many many more things, like the ensemble sounds, they don’t work for every song, but they are so much fun to play with.... and then the livecontrolls, they work very intuitive... where pa4x has kaoss, many of these things are accesible on Genos trough the live controlls, and knobs work so much better then the screen access on pa4x..
Another very huge feature to me on Genos is that there is 32 parts multitimbrallity... if you don’t play a song, you can use those 16 sounds for other things trough midi..
Where it comes to edditing, yamaha keeps it to the bare minimum where it comes to onboardedditing.. but everything is still there to addapt your sounds.. edditing is okay... sound creation is trough yem and even that is not as good as what pa4x offers you in onboard tools for edditing and creating your sounds..
The arpeggiator on the Genos is basic, just a few presets.. no loadable patterns.. but still ahead of the arpeggiator pa4x offers trough kaoss. Since i am spoiled by the modx and karma on the kronos, i haven’t played with it much..
So does the Genos offer all and everything? No, but i am configuring my ipad to overcome my long list of shortcommings...
Will i pair it with the kronos? Or another 88 key? I seriously don’t know yet, currently having so much fun with it as a standalone... but i probably will some day in the future.. there is enough room in my studio to have several setups..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#464621 - 01/16/19 03:12 AM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: kharri]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Just curious how you think it might compare to a Ketron?
I've read several articles and it seem like there are things the Ketron can't do that the Genos can, but some things may be better on the Ketron.
I have an Audya 5 and may someday get something else (SD90?, Genos). I played with a Tyros 5 and while it had a nice UI, I didn't think it sounded as good as a Ketron. Thanks for the review! A very basic personal opinion.. Both instruments are top line , sd90 and Genos.. Things where i like Genos better.. - voices - dsp power - interface - styles selection, so many available high quallity styles - the arpeggiator Things Genos can do that Sd90 can’t - organ drawbars - ensemble voices - sa2 voices - play styles and midisong at the same time - multipads - load samples - use user voices in styles and songs Things Ketron does better. - onboard style quallity(better arrangements) - style engine has more options Things Ketron sd90 does Genos can’t -launchpad -available in module and 61 keys - play multi travk audio - play 2 midi files at the same time (mixing) I probably forgot some things, but basically both have pretty much everything basic covered.. Genos has better overall sound quallity, but SD90 has a nose in front in the style selection
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#464774 - 01/19/19 09:36 AM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Dnj]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
In your case, I wonder if the old saying " No pain no gain" applies.
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#464811 - 01/19/19 11:55 PM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: guitpic1]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Seems the Genos OS suffers from 30 year of backward compatibility just as much as the tyros5 the Genos is just "another shell" over the Tyros5..
This is the main reason I never indulged in Genos the laying position of the screen automatically makes my head move forward when using it..
another reason of bewilderment to many players from T5 why Yamaha didn't design a genos TILT UP Display?I hope it all works out for you..... best scenario you keep it.... worst scenario you sell it quick & say I tried one.. good luck I am very happy with the Genos.. When the Genos moves into the upper position when i add a 2nd lower keyboard it will be at a slight angle, and there will be no more backpains.. And those same problems with the interface different with things done in an awkward way from my way of thinking, hampered the pa4x to.. its just a matter of getting used to I am really enjoying my discovery trough the keyboard, just wish i had more time.. I forgot to mention Yammies sound much more compressed vs others. ??? I sure never noticed that compared to the PA4X I had. My Genos definitely is more open and full. Yammaha samples are not compressed Regarding Genos 9 in screen....nicest screen interface I've had on a keyboard.
Maybe an advantage to a tilt up? But I can't say I've missed a tilt up screen. I agree with you.. I would say apple style interface, which is a huge compliment.. Many things are where you expect it to be.. Much much better then the pa4x, thats the reason pa4x will do an upgrade.. I am pretty sure the Genos is going to stay with me atleast as long as the pa4x, but probably longer. The YAmaha community on PSR tutorial is a wonderfull place for getting things answered. And also for sharing things. Almost as great as our community here. And while no bad over the Korgforums community, they are just a little more professional, and a little less sharing.
Edited by Bachus (01/19/19 11:57 PM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465550 - 02/01/19 12:53 AM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Mikem]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Bachus, since you own both the Genos and the MODX, I'm curious to know which one sounds better; for example, acoustic instruments, strings, orchestral brass, woodwinds and choirs. Thanks very much in advance. I think they are basically on the same level and sound identical where it comes to general sound quallity Where modx scores is the better piano sounds and the fact that there is a Bosendorfer piano available.. Also the Modx has much more power at the synth side of things, not only the FM part, but also its AWM part has things to offer, like 18 different filter types versus 6 on the Genos..many of the onboard tools in the Modx, like certain arp types and the motion sequencer, envelope follower, superknob structure definately make a difference for the depth of many synth sounds.. also where it comes to powerfull background layered strings, the broad layering capacity of the Modx makes the difference.. being able to layer more then 3 voices is a huge advantage, and not just for strings... Where it comes to acoustic sounds, its the other way around, the Genos is the one having all the tools like sa2 and ensembles to make the better sounds... also many of the sounds in Genos make more sense for the average repertoire of the arranger player. The montage/modx does not have wersi organs and such.. In the end, both sound out of this world.. and instead of feeling redundant, they start to make perfect partners in my boook, they really add to eachother.. even tough much of the soundsources is the same samples.. And a combination of both in a single instrument would be the perfect instrument for me... there is really not much left to wish for when you have both.. My biggest problem with the modx is it not having any sheetmusic stand My biggest pun with the Genos is Yem, which should have been inside the Genos, and not an external solution. Obviously both are not sound related.. Because their sound is a pleasure to my ears..
Edited by Bachus (02/01/19 01:01 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465572 - 02/01/19 10:51 AM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Bachus]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/00
Posts: 43703
|
[quote=mc2pereira]Bachus Conclusion... we need more more more revo drums.. Most likely you will see more on genos 2,.....that has always been Yamaha strategy marketing to trickle in features on each model, little by little just enough to make people buy, buy, buy, & still yearn for more on the next release over and over, SA voices was a perfect example of this in the past.... I guess marketing is what keeps selling these instruments, i guess its a necessary evil, or they might totally disappear.. I agree more and more as technology improves it also makes people realize they don't need to buy the latest and greatest model each and every time and will pass a few offerings and keep what they have for 5-10 years before they change again as the minuscule improvements are not worth it. I would say Roland figured that out years ago also as the G70, Bk9, can attest and still sound terrific today... and as we all know any arranger today sounds great and does the job in different ways using their own features. Whatever your comfortable with playing it will serve you well. And then you always have the competition of using a computer based programs,vst, etc, to create music in many ways also...the game is changing. Is it good or bad that is a personal question on has to answer for themselves. mean while enjoy what you play, when the fun stops or it gets boring try something else there are many choices.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465579 - 02/01/19 02:18 PM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Bachus]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Bachus, since you own both the Genos and the MODX, I'm curious to know which one sounds better; for example, acoustic instruments, strings, orchestral brass, woodwinds and choirs. Thanks very much in advance. I think they are basically on the same level and sound identical where it comes to general sound quallity Where modx scores is the better piano sounds and the fact that there is a Bosendorfer piano available.. Also the Modx has much more power at the synth side of things, not only the FM part, but also its AWM part has things to offer, like 18 different filter types versus 6 on the Genos..many of the onboard tools in the Modx, like certain arp types and the motion sequencer, envelope follower, superknob structure definately make a difference for the depth of many synth sounds.. also where it comes to powerfull background layered strings, the broad layering capacity of the Modx makes the difference.. being able to layer more then 3 voices is a huge advantage, and not just for strings... Where it comes to acoustic sounds, its the other way around, the Genos is the one having all the tools like sa2 and ensembles to make the better sounds... also many of the sounds in Genos make more sense for the average repertoire of the arranger player. The montage/modx does not have wersi organs and such.. In the end, both sound out of this world.. and instead of feeling redundant, they start to make perfect partners in my boook, they really add to eachother.. even tough much of the soundsources is the same samples.. And a combination of both in a single instrument would be the perfect instrument for me... there is really not much left to wish for when you have both.. My biggest problem with the modx is it not having any sheetmusic stand My biggest pun with the Genos is Yem, which should have been inside the Genos, and not an external solution. Obviously both are not sound related.. Because their sound is a pleasure to my ears.. Wow, Bachus! That's an amazing analysis! Thanks so much for your impressions of both! Having both in one, as you say, would be ideal for me, too! I can certainly understand your joy, since you have both. Enjoy your enviable position!
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465582 - 02/01/19 03:57 PM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Mikem]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 03/02/06
Posts: 7143
|
Bachus, since you own both the Genos and the MODX, I'm curious to know which one sounds better; for example, acoustic instruments, strings, orchestral brass, woodwinds and choirs. Thanks very much in advance. I think they are basically on the same level and sound identical where it comes to general sound quallity Where modx scores is the better piano sounds and the fact that there is a Bosendorfer piano available.. Also the Modx has much more power at the synth side of things, not only the FM part, but also its AWM part has things to offer, like 18 different filter types versus 6 on the Genos..many of the onboard tools in the Modx, like certain arp types and the motion sequencer, envelope follower, superknob structure definately make a difference for the depth of many synth sounds.. also where it comes to powerfull background layered strings, the broad layering capacity of the Modx makes the difference.. being able to layer more then 3 voices is a huge advantage, and not just for strings... Where it comes to acoustic sounds, its the other way around, the Genos is the one having all the tools like sa2 and ensembles to make the better sounds... also many of the sounds in Genos make more sense for the average repertoire of the arranger player. The montage/modx does not have wersi organs and such.. In the end, both sound out of this world.. and instead of feeling redundant, they start to make perfect partners in my boook, they really add to eachother.. even tough much of the soundsources is the same samples.. And a combination of both in a single instrument would be the perfect instrument for me... there is really not much left to wish for when you have both.. My biggest problem with the modx is it not having any sheetmusic stand My biggest pun with the Genos is Yem, which should have been inside the Genos, and not an external solution. Obviously both are not sound related.. Because their sound is a pleasure to my ears.. Wow, Bachus! That's an amazing analysis! Thanks so much for your impressions of both! Having both in one, as you say, would be ideal for me, too! I can certainly understand your joy, since you have both. Enjoy your enviable position! Actually writing this made me realise what to do.. Why look much further for an 88 key when you have the incredible sounds of the modx at hand? I made a nice deal, and will trade the modx 6 later this week for a modx8..
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#465584 - 02/01/19 09:23 PM
Re: Bachus first impressions on Genos ?..
[Re: Bachus]
|
Member
Registered: 08/12/14
Posts: 917
Loc: Quebec, Canada
|
Bachus, since you own both the Genos and the MODX, I'm curious to know which one sounds better; for example, acoustic instruments, strings, orchestral brass, woodwinds and choirs. Thanks very much in advance. I think they are basically on the same level and sound identical where it comes to general sound quallity Where modx scores is the better piano sounds and the fact that there is a Bosendorfer piano available.. Also the Modx has much more power at the synth side of things, not only the FM part, but also its AWM part has things to offer, like 18 different filter types versus 6 on the Genos..many of the onboard tools in the Modx, like certain arp types and the motion sequencer, envelope follower, superknob structure definately make a difference for the depth of many synth sounds.. also where it comes to powerfull background layered strings, the broad layering capacity of the Modx makes the difference.. being able to layer more then 3 voices is a huge advantage, and not just for strings... Where it comes to acoustic sounds, its the other way around, the Genos is the one having all the tools like sa2 and ensembles to make the better sounds... also many of the sounds in Genos make more sense for the average repertoire of the arranger player. The montage/modx does not have wersi organs and such.. In the end, both sound out of this world.. and instead of feeling redundant, they start to make perfect partners in my boook, they really add to eachother.. even tough much of the soundsources is the same samples.. And a combination of both in a single instrument would be the perfect instrument for me... there is really not much left to wish for when you have both.. My biggest problem with the modx is it not having any sheetmusic stand My biggest pun with the Genos is Yem, which should have been inside the Genos, and not an external solution. Obviously both are not sound related.. Because their sound is a pleasure to my ears.. Wow, Bachus! That's an amazing analysis! Thanks so much for your impressions of both! Having both in one, as you say, would be ideal for me, too! I can certainly understand your joy, since you have both. Enjoy your enviable position! Actually writing this made me realise what to do.. Why look much further for an 88 key when you have the incredible sounds of the modx at hand? I made a nice deal, and will trade the modx 6 later this week for a modx8.. If you like the MODX keybed, that's a splendid idea!
_________________________
Mike
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|