We have spent hours of time, and many words, and used up lots of bandwidth on this forum talking about 'STEREO' sound, and after listening to some really good live music recently I was thinking to myself -'how much 'stereo' do we hear in a live performance?' ... do we really hear sounds coming from the right or the left? I don't think so ...
Now before I go any further, I want to state loud and clear that I KNOW MY RIG SOUNDS BETTER WHEN I AM USING TWO SPEAKERS, FED THROUGH BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT OUTS OF MY KB ! ... and I am sure that my audiences would be able to hear the difference if I used only one speaker ... but 'STEREO' ?!? ... I don't think anyone sitting more then a few feet away from those speakers is hearing anything from the right or left - it is only a combined sound they hear ...
Unless you have certain voices panned totally left or right, - and even then at some point the sounds are combined, or one side of the audience is hearing something the other side is not ...
I think the stereo aspect is more for the player, than the audience ... and I repeat: I KNOW MY RIG SOUNDS BETTER WHEN I AM USING TWO SPEAKERS, FED THROUGH BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT OUTS OF MY KB ! but as for the audience hearing left/right stereo, I don't think so ...
JMHO ...

Pan everything to the far left (like democrats), it doesn't work.

You will hear what is absent from stereo.. Effects, panning and balance of stereo samples can be heard only in stereo. And yes the entire audience can hear a difference.

Take a commercial CD that has quality (not all do).. pan it hard left or right... tell me if it sounds as good

Did I say anything about panning everything far left?
Or did I miss the point of your post?

Let’s take a look, we have a drummer in the centre of the stage with a singer in front, to the right we have a guitar player and to the left we have a bass Player, stand in the sweet spot (Centre) and you will hear the full band, walk over towards the bass player (On the left) and you will find his sounds starts to dominate (Gets louder) with the guitar player being more difficult to hear clearly, walk over to the right and the guitar player dominates with the bass player being less clear, if you have a mono system (Doesn’t matter the number of speakers) then when you play a recording of the band everything will sound at the same volume no matter where you are in the room, (Not natural) but if you use a stereo sound system (Placed left and right) then as the bass player will be coming mainly out the left speaker and the guitar player mainly out the right speaker, you will get the same effect as if you were listening to the band live, as the volume of the players varies depending on where you are in the room.
Believe it or not stereo was not designed to improve music (This was just a bonus) but to improve film, as when someone talking walked across the screen the voice always came from the centre which was very unnatural, (The ears did not hear what the eye saw) hence stereo came about to solve the problem and make things more realistic. (Of course in the real world we hear sounds from all around us, not just in front of us, which is why we now have multi-channel surround systems to fill in this gap)

Bill

I lived through the stereo thing years ago when I used two Eon 10” speakers on polls. Does a stereo set-up sound better? Yes it does. Did I like the way they looked, one speaker on each side? Yes I did, vey much so.
I now am using one Bose Compact. Would I go back to the set-up I loved so much? No, although stereo does sound better, the better is not worth carrying two speakers. Stereo does not improve that much. IMO.

John C.

While I am sure Fran and Bill are technically correct, I lean toward John's assessment. I also think it is mainly for the benefit of the performer. I like the sound of a Leslie in stereo, for example, but I am not convinced the audience perceives the difference. This may be a poor example, as most don't even know what a Leslie is.

The main difference between MONO & STEREO is Stereo provides you with ambiance and space from the sound source.
Example a single Sax player is not Mono from the sound point of view because his playing produces reflections providing you with openness.

I go with Stereo Always my ears have never lied to me ..!

Dito Dnj

Stereo all the time.
Not just my ears, but my audience notice that too.

My 2 Cents

Manuel

Tony, my comment wasn't in response of anything you said.. It was to illustrate a way to hear what is missing in mono.. The democrat comment was sarcasm.

Makes me glad I don't have a live gig and have to drag all that gear around. I also believe stereo sound (in the right environment or equipment) works for the listener better.

Fran's comment about Panning Left gave me a mile-wide grin. Speaking of panning, when recording, one of the first things I do is turn the knobs toward the center... like where the band director would be standing. I seldom take the individual instruments provided with the style being used... unless there is a reason for keeping them. The volume's for each instrument also get a good "working over." All of this would probably go right out the window if I were performing in front of an audience like you guys.

Thanks, Tony for giving us something to express our opinions... and humor!

EXACTLY !!!!

Graham is absolutely right on the money. And, as stated above by our elder and very learned members Bernie and John, the audience likely does not perceive a difference.

While stereo will surely sound great to the entertainer, the guy behind the keyboard, this is mainly because he or she is living in a surround sound environment - the audience is not. That said, heavily stereo sampled voices will, obviously, sound better. They will sound full and rich, while those that are mono sampled tend to sound thin and somewhat weak, but that can easily be corrected with some EQs and tuning.

When I went from stereo to mono, not a single audience or audience member noticed. They likely didn't notice any difference at all. And, I was loading less on the Rock And Roller cart, my back noticed that difference, and I sold the second Bose L1 Compact for a couple hundred bucks less than I paid for it. The primary Bose L1 still sits in my office, hoping my aging body miraculously reverses the aging and disease progression and I go back to playing once again - NOT!

This dead horse has really taken a beating and the same folks seem to continue to bring it up and provide the same comments every year - AMAZING!

All the best,

Gary

ALL (not SOME, but ALL) major concerts, whether stadium or outdoor, are done in MONO. In small venues, stereo vs mono is going to be influenced by the size and shape of the audio environment. My references here are all about the audience, not the performers. With House systems, usually the 'house' will get individual mono signals from each performer, 'blend' them into a MONO signal out. Monitor signals are a different story and are usually custom configured for each performer on stage.

chas

I'm at the point where I don't know if I don't write clearly, or people just don't read and comprehend clearly ...
In my original post I said:
I think the stereo aspect is more for the player, than the audience ... and I repeat: I KNOW MY RIG SOUNDS BETTER WHEN I AM USING TWO SPEAKERS, FED THROUGH BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT OUTS OF MY KB ! but as for the audience hearing left/right stereo, I don't think so ...
JMHO ...
I respect everyone's opinion, but I have to ask those of you who said "my audience would know the difference", unless you have played for the same audience in both mono and stereo, how could they possibly tell the difference?
And yes, stereo sounds better because you are using the sounds of the KB to their fullest, but even when you are using stereo, do you REALLY think that someone in the audience is listening and thinking "Oh I heard that 'voice' from the LEFT speaker and I heard this other 'voice' from the RIGHT speaker" ... THAT'S my point, and as I said earlier, I think not ...

Actually they are not, just because each person on stage has their own signal (Exactly the same happens in the recording studio) they are mixed by the engineers on-site to create a stereo sound field for both recording purposes and realism, (Recordings played at home would not sound live if everything was mixed down to mono) the reason each has their own input is so that the mixing engineers can mix each one to give the best sound balance and spread for the audience, if they didn’t, then while the crowd would see the band spread out across the stage, their ears would tell them that all the sound was coming from the centre of the stage, which is very unnatural sounding and would make the overall performance sound meh.

Bill

Bill, I wasn't talking about recordings. Recordings are normally listened to in small spaces where stereo would be effective. I meant large venues like stadiums, large college auditoriums, or outdoor areas the size of 3 football fields. There, the sound needs to be uniform regardless of where you are positioned in the audience.

chas

Tony Mads is right. Stereo is for the benefit of the performer. And if I were still performing, I would certainly use it. When I last performed, I was using backing tracks mixed in stereo and I wanted to hear the sound the way I had created it. Same would be true using a keyboard, I would want to hear stereo. The audience doesn't know the difference. Now, there could be a few people here and there who are audiophiles and have trained their ear to a certain degree. But the average person in the audience can't tell much IMO. And some of the people I have seen playing music over the years and getting paid for it proves that to my satisfaction anyway.

Chas is right about the concerts - they are ALL in mono - not stereo. I used to help set up the band stands for many of them at the Maryland State Fairgrounds. Often dozen or more speakers, all huge, all out of the huge mono mixer board.

Gary

Donny, I just read both pages of that link, and it appears that Gearslutz guys pretty much agree with Tony, Chas and myself - and this was both indoors and outdoors. It's for the benefit of the performer - not the audience.

Gary

People are confusing the meaning of stereo and mono, when people talk stereo they are talking a stereo sound field (These days we have a multi-channel sound field) where the sound that the Crowd/Audience hears matches what they are seeing on stage, mono cannot create a sound field as it is a point source, (It can only come form one position) however if you have multiple inputs (A mono input from each performer) then you can mix these inputs to create the optimum sound field (Stereo or multi-channel depending on the number of output channels used) and quality of sound that matches what the Crowd/Audience sees.

Bill

I don't care what Sinatra did, or what Grand Funk Railroad or Gary did 30 years ago. I know what works best for me. And that's stereo.
If you don't like it, don't use it. Simple.

AMEN

MEL

I LOVE the sound of my two 147 RV's when they are three feet behind me, but when someone sits in and I'm more than 10 feet away, those Leslies sound like a tremolo effect.

Always wondered why Beatles music played in restaurants was played with no lead voices. Then I realized voices, for some reason, were panned all the way to one side. Cheap traditional sound systems (the ones with the cans in the ceiling)were mono. I fixed a bunch of them by simply using an adapter that summed the signal into a mono out.

I'm still using an 8 channel Carvin 600 watt mono head or an 800 watt 10 channel Yamaha stereo, which I set either for stereo or, if I'm powering monitors, two mono signals out.

Works for me.


Russ

OMG - first it was Chas, not DonM. The forum is becoming a bit depressing.

Gary

Russ ... funny you mentioned that ... a number of years ago, riding in my car listening to the radio, a Beatles song came on and I could barely hear the voices ... I played with the 'Balance' setting and found the same thing - the voices were all panned to one side ... ???

++1

Stereophonic sound, commonly called stereo, is the reproduction of sound, using two or more independent audio channels, through a symmetrical configuration of loudspeakers, in such a way as to create a pleasant and natural impression of sound heard from various directions, as in natural hearing. It is often contrasted with monophonic (or “monaural”, or just mono) sound, where audio is in the form of one channel, often centered in the sound field (analogous to a visual field).

Stereo recordings are used in FM broadcasting and DAB and in several television systems. To record in stereo, sound engineers use various methods, including using two directional microphones, two parallel omnidirectional microphones, or more complex techniques. To remaster monophonic records, various techniques of “pseudo-stereo” or “quasi-stereo” are used to create the impression that the sound was recorded in stereo.

The BBC made radio’s first stereo broadcast in December 1925. In the 1930s, Harvey Fletcher of Bell Laboratories investigated techniques for stereophonic recording and reproduction. The first commercial motion picture to be exhibited with stereophonic sound was Walt Disney’s Fantasia (film) (1940). By the mid-1950s, multichannel sound was common for big-budget Hollywood motion pictures.[1] In 1953, Remington Records began taping some of its sessions in stereo, including performances by Thor Johnson and the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra. The US Federal Communications Commission announced stereophonic FM technical standards in April 1961, and licensed regular stereophonic FM radio broadcasting to begin in the United States in 1961. In 1984, Multichannel television sound was adopted by the FCC as the U.S. standard for stereo television transmission.

Contents [show]

Description

The word “stereophonic” — derived from Greek stereos = “solid” and phōnē = “sound” — was coined by Western Electric, by analogy with the word “stereoscopic”. In popular usage, stereo usually means 2-channel sound recording and sound reproduction using data for more than one speaker simultaneously. In technical usage, stereo or stereophony means sound recording and sound reproduction that uses stereographic projection to encode the relative positions of objects and events recorded. A stereo system can include any number of channels, such as the surround sound 5.1- and 6.1-channel systems used on high-end film and television productions. However, in common use it refers to systems with only two channels. The electronic device for playing back stereo sound is often referred to as “a stereo”.

During two-channel stereo recording, two microphones are placed in strategically chosen locations relative to the sound source, with both recording simultaneously. The two recorded channels will be similar, but each will have distinct time-of-arrival and sound-pressure-level information. During playback, the listener’s brain uses those subtle differences in timing and sound-level to triangulate the positions of the recorded objects. Stereo recordings often cannot be played on monaural systems without a significant loss of fidelity. Since each microphone records each wavefront at a slightly different time, the wavefronts are out of phase; as a result, constructive and destructive interference can occur, if both tracks are played back on the same speaker. This phenomenon is known as phase cancellation.

Recording methodsX-Y technique: intensity stereophony

Here, two directional microphones at the same place, and typically pointing at an angle 90° or more to each other — see also “The Stereophonic Zoom” by Michael Williams. A stereo effect is achieved through differences in sound pressure level between two microphones. The level difference of 18 dB (16 to 20 dB) is needed for hearing the direction of a loudspeaker. Due to the lack of differences in time-of-arrival / phase-ambiguities, the sonic characteristic of X-Y recordings has less sense of space and depth when compared to recordings employing an AB-setup. When two figure-of-eight microphones are used, facing ±45° with respect to the sound source, the X-Y-setup is called a Blumlein Pair. The sonic image produced is realistic, almost ‘holographic’. See also Acoustic intensity.

A-B technique: time-of-arrival stereophony

This uses two parallel omnidirectional microphones some distance apart, so capturing time-of-arrival stereo information as well as some level (amplitude) difference information, especially if employed in close proximity to the sound source(s). At a distance of about 60 cm (0.6 m) the time delay (time of arrival difference) for a signal reaching first one and then the other microphone from the side is approximately 1.5 msec (1 to 2 msec). According to Eberhard Sengpiel this is enough to locate the sound source exactly at the speaker on the respective side, resulting in a stereophonic pickup angle of 180°. If you increase the distance between the microphones you effectively decrease the pickup angle. At 70 cm distance it is about equivalent to the pickup angle of the near-coincident ORTF-setup. This technique can produce phase issues when the stereo signal is mixed to mono.

M/S technique: Mid/Side stereophony

This coincident technique employs a bidirectional microphone facing sideways and another microphone (generally a variety of cardioid, although Alan Blumlein described the usage of an omnidirectional transducer in his original patent) at an angle of 90° facing the sound source. The left and right channels are produced through a simple matrix: Left = Mid + Side, Right = Mid – Side (the polarity-reversed side-signal). This configuration produces a completely mono-compatible signal, and if the Mid and Side signals are recorded — rather than the matrixed Left and Right — the stereo width can be manipulated after the recording has taken place, which makes it especially useful for the usage on film-based projects.

Near-coincident technique: mixed stereophony

These techniques combine the principles of both A/B and X/Y (coincident pair) techniques. For example, the ORTF stereo technique of the Office de Radiodiffusion Télévision Française (i.e., Radio France), calls for a pair of cardioid microphones placed 17 cm apart at a total angle between microphones of 110 degrees that results in a stereophonic pickup-angle of 96°.[2] In the NOS stereo technique of the Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (i.e., Holland Radio), the total angle between microphones is 90 degrees and the distance is 30 cm, so capturing time-of-arrival stereo information as well as level information. It is noteworthy that the spacing of 17 cm has nothing to do with human ear distance. The recorded signals are generally intended for playback over stereo loudspeakers and not for earphones.

Pseudo stereo

In the course of restoration or remastering of monophonic records, various techniques of “pseudo-stereo”, “quasi-stereo” or “rechanneled stereo” have been used to create the impression that the sound was recorded in stereo. These techniques originally involved hardware methods (see Duophonic) or, more recently, a combination of hardware and software. Multitrack Studio from Bremmers Audio Design (The Netherlands)[3], uses special filters to achieve pseudo stereo effect, the “shelve” filter directing low frequencies to the left channel and high frequencies to the right channel, and the “comb” filter adding a small delay in signal timing between the two channels, a delay barely noticeable by ear (the comb filter allows range of manipulation between 0 and 100 milliseconds), but contributing to an effect of “widening” original “fattiness” of mono recording[4][5].

The special pseudo-stereo circuit, invented by Kishii and Noro from Japan, was patented in the United States in 2003[6], with already previously issued patents for similar devices[7]. Artificial stereo techniques have been used to improve the listening experience of monophonic recordings, or to make them more “saleable” in today’s markets where people expect stereo. Some critics have expressed concern about the use of these methods[8].

Binaural recording

Engineers make a technical distinction between “binaural” and “stereophonic” recording. Of these, binaural recording is more like stereoscopic photography. In binaural recording, a pair of microphones is put inside a model of a human head which includes external ears and ear canals. Each microphone is where the eardrum would be. The recording is then played back through headphones, so that each channel is presented independently, without mixing or crosstalk. Thus, each of the listener’s eardrums is driven with a replica of the auditory signal it would have experienced at the recording location. The result is an accurate duplication of the auditory spatiality that would have been heard by the listener placed where the microphones were. Because of the nuisance of wearing headphones, true binaural recordings have remained laboratory and audiophile curiosities.

Playback

Stereophonic sound attempts to create an illusion of location for various instruments within the original recording. The recording engineer’s goal is usually to create a stereo “image” with localization information. When a stereophonic recording is heard through loudspeaker systems rather than headphones, each ear of course hears sound from both speakers. The audio engineer may and often does use more than two microphones, sometimes many more, and may mix them down to two tracks in ways that exaggerate the separation of the instruments to compensate for the mixture that occurs when listening via speakers.

Descriptions of stereophonic sound tend to stress the ability to localize the position of each instrument in space, but in reality many people listen on playback systems that do a poor job of re-creating a stereo “image”. Many listeners assume that “stereo” sound is “richer” or “fuller-sounding” than monophonic sound. This is inaccurate — stereo and mono can have equally detailed abilities to play recorded notes. The spatial illusion is what sets stereo recordings apart from mono recordings. When playing back stereo recordings, best results are obtained by using two speakers, in front of and equidistant from the listener, with the listener located on the center line between the two speakers.

Vinyl records

In 1958 the first group of stereo two-channel records were issued – by Audio Fidelity in the USA and Pye in Britain, using the Westrex “45/45” single-groove system. While the stylus moves horizontally when reproducing a monophonic disk recording, on stereo records the stylus moves vertically as well as horizontally. One could envision a system in which the left channel was recorded laterally, as on a monophonic recording, with the right channel information recorded with a “hill-and-dale” vertical motion; such systems were proposed but not adopted, due to their incompatibility with existing phono pickup designs (see below). In the Westrex system, each channel drives the cutting head at a 45 degree angle to the vertical. During playback the combined signal is sensed by a left channel coil mounted diagonally opposite the inner side of the groove, and a right channel coil mounted diagonally opposite the outer side of the groove.[9]

The combined stylus motion in terms of the vector sum and difference of the two stereo channels. Effectively, all horizontal stylus motion conveys the L+R sum signal, and vertical stylus motion carries the L-R difference signal. The advantages of the 45/45 system are that it has greater compatibility with monophonic recording and playback systems. A monophonic cartridge will reproduce an equal blend of the left and right channels instead of reproducing only one channel. Conversely, a stereo cartridge reproduces the lateral grooves of monophonic recording equally through both channels, rather than one channel. As well, it gives a more balanced sound, because the two channels have equal fidelity (rather than providing one higher-fidelity laterally recorded channel and one lower-fidelity vertically recorded channel). Overall, this approach may give higher fidelity, because the “difference” signal is usually of low power and thus less affected by the intrinsic distortion of “hill-and-dale”-style recording.

This system was invented by Alan Blumlein of EMI in 1931 and patented the same year. EMI cut the first stereo test discs using the system in 1933. It was not used commercially until a quarter of a century later. Stereo sound provides a more natural listening experience where the spatial location of the source of a sound is, at least in part, reproduced. In the 1970s, it was common practice to generate stereo versions of music from monophonic master tapes which were normally marked “electronically enhanced stereo Ø” on track listings. These were generated by a variety of filtering techniques to try to separate out various elements which left noticeable and unsatisfactory artefacts in the sound, typically sounding phased.

The development of quadraphonic records was announced in 1971. These recorded four separate sound signals. This was achieved on the two stereo channels by electronic matrixing, where the additional channels were combined into the main signal. When the records were played, phase-detection circuits in the amplifiers were able to decode the signals into four separate channels. There were two main systems of matrixed quadrophonic records produced, confusingly named SQ (by CBS) and QS (by Sansui). They proved commercially unsuccessful, but were an important precursor to later ‘surround sound’ systems, as seen in SACD and home cinema today. A different format, CD-4 (not to be confused with compact disc), by RCA, encoded rear channel information on an ultrasonic carrier, which required a special wideband cartridge to capture it on carefully-calibrated pickup arm/turntable combinations. Typically the high frequency information inscribed onto these LPs wore off after only a few playings, and CD-4 was even less successful than the two matrixed formats.

BroadcastingRadio

In FM broadcasting, the Zenith-GE pilot-tone stereo system is used throughout the world.

Because of the limited audio quality of the majority of AM receivers, and because of the relative scarcity of AM stereo receivers, relatively few stations employ stereo. Various modulation schemes are used for AM stereo, of which the best-known is Motorola’s C-QUAM which is the official method for most countries in the world which decide to use AM Stereo. More AM stations are adopting digital HD Radio which allows the transmission of stereo sound on AM stations. For Digital Audio Broadcasting, MP2 audio streams are used. DAB is one of the Digital Radio format which is used to broadcast Digital Audio over terrestrial broadcast network or Satellite network. DAB is extended to Video and called new format as DMB.

Television

For Analog TV (PAL and NTSC), various modulation schemes are used in different parts of the world to broadcast more than one sound channel. These are sometimes used to provide two mono sound channels in different languages rather than stereo. Multichannel television sound is used mainly in the Americas. NICAM is widely used in Europe (except in Germany, where Zweikanalton is used). The EIAJ FM/FM subcarrier system is used in Japan. For Digital TV, MP2 audio streams are widely used within MPEG-2 program streams.

History1881

Clément Ader demonstrated the first two-channel audio system in Paris in 1881, with a series of telephone transmitters connected from the stage of the Paris Opera to a suite of rooms at the Paris Electrical Exhibition, where listeners could hear a live transmission of performances through receivers for each ear. Scientific American reported,

Every one who has been fortunate enough to hear the telephones at the Palais de l’Industrie has remarked that, in listening with both ears at the two telephones, the sound takes a special character of relief and localization which a single receiver cannot produce. . . . This phenomenon is very curious, it approximates to the theory of binauriclar auduition, and has never been applied, we believe, before to produce this remarkable illusion to which may almost be given the name of auditive perspective.
This two-channel telephonic process was commercialized in France from 1890 to 1932 as the Théâtrophone, and in England from 1895 to 1925 as the Electrophone. Both were services available by coin-operated receivers at hotels and cafés, or by subscription to private homes.[10]

1930s

In the 1930s, Harvey Fletcher of Bell Laboratories investigated investigated techniques for stereophonic recording and reproduction. One of the techniques investigated was the ‘Wall of Sound,’ which used an enormous array of microphones hung in a line across the front of an orchestra. Up to eighty microphones were used, and each fed a corresponding loudspeaker, placed in an identical position, in a separate listening room. Several stereophonic test recordings, using two microphones connected to two styli cutting two separate grooves on the same wax disc, were made with Leopold Stokowski and the Philadelphia Orchestra at Philadelphia’s Academy of Music in March 1932. The first, made on March 12, 1932 of Scriabin’s Prometheus: Poem of Fire, is the earliest surviving stereo recording.[11]

Bell Laboratories gave a demonstration of three-channel stereophonic sound on April 27, 1933 with a live transmission of the Philadelphia Orchestra from Philadelphia to Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C. Leopold Stokowski, normally the orchestra’s conductor, was present in Constitution Hall to control the sound mix. Bell Labs also demonstrated binaural sound, using a dummy with microphones instead of ears, at the Chicago World’s Fair in 1933.[12] Two stereophonic recording methods, using two channels and coincident microphone techniques (X-Y with bidirectional transducers / Blumlein-setup & M/S-stereophony), were developed by Alan Blumlein at EMI in 1931 and patented in 1933. A stereo disc, using the two walls of the groove at right angles to carry the two channels, was cut at EMI in 1933, twenty-five years before that method became the standard for stereo phonograph discs.

1940 to 1970The 1940 Carnegie Hall demonstration

The Carnegie Hall demonstration by Bell Laboratories on April 9 and 10, 1940, used three huge speaker systems. Synchronization was achieved by making the recordings in the form of three motion-picture soundtracks recorded on a single piece of film. Because of dynamic range limitations, volume compression was used, with a fourth track being used to regulate volume expansion. The Dolby noise reduction system of the 1970s was a far more sophisticated version of a basically similar technique. The volume compression and expansion were not fully automatic, but were designed to allow manual studio “enhancement”, i.e., the artistic adjustment of overall volume and the relative volume of each track. The recordings had been made by the Philadelphia Orchestra, conducted by Leopold Stokowski, who was always interested in sound reproduction technology. Stokowski personally participated in the “enhancement” of the sound.

The speakers used generated 1,500 watts of acoustic power, producing sound levels of up to 100 decibels, and the demonstration held the audience “spellbound, and at times not a little terrified,” according to one report.[13] Sergei Rachmaninoff, who was present at the demonstration, commented that it was “marvellous” but “somehow unmusical because of the loudness.” “Take that Pictures at an Exhibition,” he said. “I didn’t know what it was until they got well into the piece. Too much ‘enhancing’, too much Stokowski.”

Motion picture era

Bell Laboratories in New York City gave a demonstration in 1937 of two-channel stereophonic motion pictures, developed by Bell Labs and Electrical Research Products, Inc.[14] Conductor Leopold Stokowski recorded onto a nine-track sound system at the Academy of Music in Philadelphia, during the making of the movie One Hundred Men and a Girl for Universal Pictures in 1937. The tracks were mixed down to one for the final soundtrack.[15][16] In 1938, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer started using three tracks to record movie soundtracks instead of one, and very quickly upgraded to four tracks. One track was used for dialogue, two for music, and one for sound effects. The purpose for this form of multi-track recording was to make mixing down to a single optical track easier and was not intended to be a recording for stereophonic purposes. The very first binaural recording MGM made (although released in mono) was “It Never Rains But What It Pours” by Judy Garland, recorded on June 21, 1938 for the movie Love Finds Andy Hardy.

The first commercial motion picture to be exhibited with stereophonic sound was Walt Disney’s Fantasia, released in November 1940, for which a specialized sound process, Fantasound, was developed. Fantasound used a separate film containing four optical sound tracks. Three of the tracks were audible, and the fourth track controlled the volume level of the theater’s amplifiers. The film was not a financial success, however, and after two months of road-show exhibition in selected cities, its soundtrack was remixed into mono sound for general release. In the early 1940s, the forward-thinking Alfred Newman directed the construction of a sound stage equipped for multi channel recording for 20th Century Fox studios. Several soundtracks from this era still exist in their multichannel elements, some of which have been released on DVD including How Green Was My Valley, Anna and the King of Siam, Sun Valley Serenade, and The Day the Earth Stood Still.

The advent of magnetic tape recording made high-fidelity synchronized multichannel recording technically straightforward, though costly. By the early 1950s, all of the major studios were recording on magnetic 35mm tape for mixing purposes. Motion picture theatres, however, are where the real introduction of stereophonic sound to the public occurred. Stereo sound was proven viable with the release of This Is Cinerama on September 30, 1952. Cinerama was a spectacular wide-screen process fully comparable to today’s IMAX. Cinerama required several architectural specifications for the theatre of its presentation. Cinerama’s audio soundtrack utilized seven discrete magnetic sound tracks, six of them audible plus a seventh track that controlled the volume level of the amplifiers. The system was developed by Hazard Reeves, a pioneer in magnetic recording technology. By all accounts, including accounts by those who have experienced the process in rare recent showings, the sound was as spectacular as the picture and excellent even by modern standards.

In April 1953, while This Is Cinerama was still playing only in New York City, most moviegoing audiences heard stereophonic sound for the first time with the Warner Bros. 3-D film production of House of Wax, starring Vincent Price. The sound system, WarnerPhonic, was a combination of a 35mm magnetic full-coat that contained Left-Center-Right, in synchronization with the two, dual-strip Polaroid system projectors, one of which carried an optical surround track, and one which carried a mono backup track should anything go wrong. Only two other films carried WarnerPhonic sound, the 3-D production of The Charge at Feather River, and Island in the Sky. The magnetic tracks to these films are considered lost.

A large percentage of 3-D films carried variations on 3-track magnetic sound. Other instances include It Came From Outer Space, I, The Jury, The Stranger Wore a Gun, Inferno, Kiss Me, Kate, and many others. By the summer of 1953, the movie industry moved quickly to create simpler and cheaper wide-screen systems, such as CinemaScope, which used up to four magnetic sound tracks, and which were capable of being retrofitted into existing theatres. CinemaScope 55 was created by the same company in order to use a larger form of the system (55mm instead of 35mm), and was supposed to have had 6-track stereo, but the process proved impractical, and the two films made in it, Carousel and The King and I, were shown in 35mm CinemaScope. The premiere engagement of Carousel, however, did use 6-track stereo, on a separate magnetic sound track, and a 1961 re-release of The King and I, with the film “blown up” to 70 mm, also used a six-track stereo soundtrack.

Cole Porter memorialized the era in the 1957 song Silk Stockings:

If Zanuck’s latest picture were the good old-fashioned kind,
There’d be no one in front to look at Marilyn’s behind.
If you want to hear applauding hands resound
You’ve gotta have glorious Technicolor,
Breathtaking Cinemascope and
Stereophonic sound.

Consumer media

From 1940 to 1970, the progress of stereophonic sound was paced by the technical difficulties of recording and reproducing two (or more) channels in synchronization, and by the economic and marketing issues of introducing new audio media and equipment. To a rough approximation, a stereo system cost twice as much as a monophonic system, since a stereo system had to be assembled by buying two preamplifiers, two amplifiers, and two speaker system. It was not clear whether consumers would think the sound was so much better as to be worth twice the price.

In 1952 Emory Cook (1913–2002), who already made fame by designing new feedback disk cutter heads to improve sound from tape to vinyl, developed a ‘binaural’ record. This record consisted of two separate channels cut into two separate grooves running next to each other. Each groove needed a needle and each needle was connected to a separate amplifier and speaker. The set-up was intended to give a demonstration at a New York audio fair of Cook’s cutter heads rather than to sell the record. But soon afterwards the demand for such recordings and the equipment to play it grew, and Cook Records began to produce such records commercially. He recorded a vast array of sounds, ranging from railroad sounds to thunderstorms. (The term ‘binaural’ that Cook used should not be confused with the modern use of the word, where ‘binaural’ is an inner ear recording using small microphones placed in the ear. Cook used conventional microphones but gave his stereo record the name ‘binaural’ record.)

In 1953, Remington Records began taping some of its sessions in stereo, including performances by Thor Johnson and the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra. Later that year, RCA Victor conducted some experimental stereo tapings with Leopold Stokowski and a group of New York musicians; in February 1954, RCA taped the Boston Symphony Orchestra conducted by Charles Münch in a performance of Berlioz’s Damnation of Faust, which led to regular stereo tapings by the company. Shortly afterwards, legendary conductor Arturo Toscanini’s last two public concerts were recorded on stereophonic magnetic tape. They were, however, not released in stereo until 1987 and 2007, respectively. In the UK, Decca Records began taping in stereo in mid-1954. In the early 1950s, companies such as Concertapes and RCA Victor began releasing stereophonic recordings on two-track prerecorded reel-to-reel magnetic tape. Serious audiophiles, the sort of people who would later be called “early adopters”, bought them, and stereophonic sound came to at least some living rooms.[17] Stereo recording became widespread in the music business by the fall of 1957.

The small record company Audio Fidelity released the first stereophonic disc in November 1957. Sidney Frey, founder and president, had Westrex cut a disk for release before any of the major record labels.[18][19] Side 1 was the Dukes of Dixieland, Side 2 was railroad sound effects. On December 16, Frey advertised in the trade magazine Billboard that he would send a free copy to anyone in the industry who wrote to him on company letterhead.

That move generated a great deal of publicity.[20] Frey promptly released four additional stereo disks. The equipment dealers had no choice but to demonstrate on Audio Fidelity Records. The first stereophonic discs available to the buying public came out in the summer of 1958.[21] By 1968 the major record labels stopped making monaural discs.[22][23]

Early broadcasting

Radio: The BBC’s experimental transmitting station 5XX in Daventry, Northamptonshire, made radio’s first stereo broadcast in December 1925, of a concert conducted by Sir Hamilton Harty from Manchester, with 5XX broadcasting the right channel nationally by long wave, and local BBC stations broadcasting the left channel by medium wave. The BBC repeated the experiment in 1926, using 2LO in London and 5XX at Daventry. Following experimental FM stereo transmissions in the London area in 1958, and regular Saturday morning demonstration transmissions using TV sound and medium wave (AM) radio to provide the two channels, the first regular BBC transmissions using an FM stereo signal began on the BBC’s Third Programme network on August 28, 1962. .

Chicago AM radio station WGN and its sister FM station WGNB collaborated on an hour-long stereophonic demonstration broadcast on May 22, 1952, with one audio channel broadcast by the AM station and the other audio channel by the FM station.[24] New York City’s WQXR initiated its first stereophonic broadcasts in October 1952, and by 1954 was broadcasting all of its live musical programs in stereophonic sound, using its AM and FM stations for the two audio channels.[25]

After several years of experimental stereo broadcasts, and six competing systems, the Federal Communications Commission announced stereophonic FM technical standards in April 1961, and licensed regular stereophonic FM radio broadcasting to begin in the United States on June 1, 1961.[26] WEFM in the Chicago area and WGFM in Schenectady, New York reported as the first stereo stations.[27]

Television: A closed-circuit television performance of Carmen from the Metropolitan Opera House in New York City to thirty-one theaters across the United States on December 11, 1952 included a stereophonic sound system developed by RCA.[28] The first several shows of the 1958–1959 season of The Plymouth Show (i.e., The Lawrence Welk Show) on the ABC network were broadcast with stereophonic sound in some cities, with one audio channel broadcast via television and the other over the ABC radio network.[29] By the same method, NBC television and the NBC radio network offered stereo sound for The George Gobel Show on October 21, 1958. ABC’s Walt Disney Presents made a stereo broadcast of The Peter Tchaikovsky Story, including scenes from Disney’s latest animated feature Sleeping Beauty, on January 30, 1959 by using ABC-affiliated AM and FM stations for the left and right audio channels.

With the advent of FM Stereo in 1961, a small number of music oriented shows were broadcast with stereo sound using a process called simulcasting in which the audio portion of the show was carried over a local FM stereo station. In the 1960s and 1970s, these shows were usually manually synchronized with a mail delivered reel-to-reel tape to the FM station (unless the concert or music was locally originated). In the 1980s, satellite delivery of both television and radio programs made this fairly hard process of synchronization unnecessary. One of the last of these simulcast programs was Friday Night Videos on NBC, just before MTS stereo was approved by the FCC.

Cable TV systems delivered many stereo programs utilizing this method for many years until prices for MTS stereo modulators dropped. One of the first stereo cable stations was The Movie Channel, though the most popular cable TV station that drove up usage of stereo simulcasting was MTV.

MTS: Stereo for television Multichannel television sound, better known as MTS (often still as BTSC, for the Broadcast Television Systems Committee that created it), is the method of encoding three additional channels of audio into an NTSC-format audio carrier. It was adopted by the FCC as the U.S. standard for stereo television transmission in 1984. Sporadic network transmission of stereo audio began on NBC on July 26, 1984, with the Tonight Show, although at the time, only the NBC station in New York City had stereo broadcast capability;[30] regular stereo transmission of programs began in 1985.

Common usage

In common usage, a “stereo” is a two-channel sound reproduction system, and a “stereo recording” is a two-channel recording. This is a cause for much confusion, since five- (or more) -channel home theater systems are not popularly described as “stereo”. It is thus worth noting that most film soundtracks are not recorded using stereo techniques, so while they are capable of stereo reproduction, most home theater systems rarely are called upon to do this.

Most two-channel recordings are stereo recordings only in this weaker sense. Pop music, in particular, is usually recorded using close miking techniques, which artificially separates signals into several tracks. The separate tracks, of which there may be hundreds, are then “mixed-down” into a two-channel recording. By using “left-right” panning controls, the audio engineers determine where each track will be placed in the stereo “image”. The end product with this process often bears little or no resemblance to the actual physical and spatial relationship of the musicians at the time of the original performance. Indeed, it is not uncommon for different tracks of the same song to be recorded at different times, and even in different studios, and then mixed into a final two-channel recording for commercial release.

Classical music recordings are a notable exception; they are more likely to be recorded “live”, so that the actual physical and spatial relationship of the musicians at the time of the original performance is preserved on the recording.

Balance

Balance can mean the amount of signal from each channel reproduced in a stereo audio recording. Typically, a balance control will have 0 dB of gain in the center position for both channels, and attenuate one channel as the control is turned, leaving the other channel at 0 dB.[31]

Ain't Google and Wikipedia a wonderful thing!

Gary

Yes sir... You can really learn alot reading about the OP.... But many choose Facebook for their news instead... Go figure

I was on Facebook for about 3 months, signed off, deleted my information and never looked back. If friends and family want to get in touch with me, they have both my telephone numbers. Way too many people on Facebook with agendas to grind.

Gary

Gary don't forget Instagram...
Snap Chat, Twitter
Etc, etc,

If you go searching for rubbish (Or subscribe to every site) then you will find it, however if you use it sensibly there are many groups for virtually every hobby which you can think of, and just subscribing to these sites makes the world a lot smaller and friendlier place.

Bill

Sorry Bill, I'm just not a social media type person. I would much rather have personal contact with my friends and family.

All the best,

Gary

Its fun when you realise that most instruments are mono...
Only instruments like a piano when sitting behind it create a stereo spectrum..

But throw all those mono instruments in a symphonic orchestra, and it becomes a stereo sound.

So for most instrumemts a mono osvilator should do the trick, as long as youhave a panning option..


Stereo is our perception of sounds in the real world?
Or isn’t it?
No it isn’t as stereo has 2 dimensions while real world sounds live in 3 dimensions..


Now here is my question...
Why aren’t our home instruments surround sound yet?



(And yes i realise that creating a 3d live sound is only possible if the crowd wears 3d headsets)
Strange thing, my integra7 was suround, but only used it in stereo, as my headsets and speakers where stereo)

Exactly
Theres so many good sites for different interests. I've picked up some good info from these sites. I got on Facebook and soon started getting all the Political crap thats going around these days. I blocked anyone or any site posting that stuff. Don't give up on it, you can control it.