|
|
|
|
|
|
#484867 - 12/22/19 02:10 PM
PSR-3000 vs PSR-S950
|
Member
Registered: 11/11/04
Posts: 708
Loc: Russia
|
Hello guys, happy holidays!
I have some thoughts here and this time I guess I won't post a video, as I've already posted a lot of my videos of these two keyboards.
As you may know, I had a problem with PSR-S950, I needed to fix a pitch bend and to make some buttons more responsive. First time it was in a service they fixed it without changing parts and it was fine for about 8 months after that, but then the problem came back. Next time I brought it to the service they suggested replacing the pitch bend altogether and to put new buttons (a style section: A,B,C,D...), as old ones had been overused by me. Not a big deal, but it took about 3 months to get new parts delivered, so I was stucked with my old PSR-3000.
At first I was uninspired to play it as I had an impression that "everyone is buying new cool keyboards and I'm going backwards", but later I tried some new things and my new impression was "this chase after new expensive keyboards has really distracted me from what music is really about".
I started to practice some music in a style of Christmas, also downloaded additional styles from PSRTutorial and soon I got a call from the service saying that my PSR-S950 is finally ready.
To tell the truth I had a mixed feeling on hearing the news, as I felt this reconnection with PSR-3000, but I thought that now PSR-S950 would impress me even more.
So I picked it up, brought it home, started to play. And I was a bit dissapointed. But that evening I was rather tired from all the trips I had made.
But I tried it the next day, and the day after that and so far I ended up playing PSR-3000 instead.
Comparing to PSR-3000, PSR-S950 has a lot of more realistic voices. But I have an impression that these new realistic voices tend to sound too serious. I try to recreate the same Christmas music on S950 that I practiced on 3000 and it doesn't work well.
In addition, while the buttons that have been replaced work fine, the rest of buttons (around the screen) are still not very responsive (the contacts have supposedly been cleaned) - comparing to firm buttons on PSR-3000 it's surely dissapointing.
Another impression after going from PSR-3000 to PSR-S950 was "it does have too much bass".
While PSR-S950 has more voices, in fact, there's quite a list of thing where it losses to old PSR-3000. As stated, there's a problems with buttons (progresses over time). There's too much bass. There's no line-out. There's no line-in (it has AUX-in instead, which is rather noisy). It's much harder to grab (comparing to PSR-3000).
Is also has no card-reader and an internet option, but those things are not so usable.
PSR-3000 has its own problems that were fixed on PSR-S950 which is a noisy volume control knob and it some background noise in general.
PSR-S950 also has such buttons as "DSP" of "Harmony".
But I'm still under an impression that I used to overestimate the difference between there two keyboards.
Right now I think that if I'm to play some gig I will go with PSR-3000. It just sounds jollier.
And this very thought made me to think about these cases when people aren't satisfied with their upgrades.
And I'm thinking that maybe "super-realistic-blow-away-sound" is not necessary the thing which is required to make your gig better. Maybe sometimes you need your keyboard to sound naive? Maybe you don't want your keyboard to sound that serious?
Trying to entertain the audience with your performance is not the same as demonstrating a keyboard to a potential buyers.
You know, I can proceed this story even further, although I'm not sure that I use English in a right way when I'm expressing myself, but, I think, I just have to let it out.
I think I understand better now why some of you prefer to work with Roland E-A7. Perhaps, when you are doing a show it's not about how realistic and "expensive" each sound the keyboard produces is. You want your sounds to be colorful, expressive, and you want your keyboard to be responsive, you want it to "work like a clock". And it really helps if it's more portable as well.
Maybe it is some Christmas present I get this year - realising that I do not need at all any new keyboards and that getting one doesn't really solve anything.
In the same time, it's true that changes can be good in many ways. But it doesn't take Genos to change your scenery. If you want just something else to play on, surely, there're a lot of options under $1000.
I'm still rather confused, to be honest, I guess I'll change my mind back and forth for many more times, but right now I can't really declare that PSR-s950 is better than PSR-3000, while just recently I thought it was no-brainer.
Edited by Kabinopus (12/23/19 11:55 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#484904 - 12/22/19 10:31 PM
Re: PSR-3000 vs PSR-S950 (no video here)
[Re: Kabinopus]
|
Member
Registered: 03/22/17
Posts: 449
Loc: Mountain Home, AR
|
Wow! Super comments! I am realizing more and more that my 3000 is capable of doing everything I want and need it to do, I just need to learn how to use it. I'm loosing the desire for a new kb more and more everyday and reading your posts helps out immensely.
_________________________
PSR 740,PSR 3000, Mirage, tx7, mp32, Pro Tools 10,11 SONAR, Reaper, BIAB 2020 and a pile of Computer Music mags w/disks College student was working on Doctoral, Education Now just doing courses to do courses
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|