|
|
|
|
|
|
#506397 - 09/02/22 10:57 AM
The Yamaha product gap
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
Is Yamaha missing out? It’s rather strange, Yamaha’s arranger product line has an enormous gap between the 61 note SX900 and the 76 note Genos. The price jumps from about $2200 or thereabouts to a wallet destroying $5.5k+ with absolutely nothing in between.
Is there a case to be made for a 76 SX or a 61 note Genos?
To be honest, I think that a 61 Genos would be a bit crippled, but in fairness, the Tyros line did quite well without a 76. But the SX line without a 76 misses out on quite a sizable sector that use PA3/4x 76’s or cling to aging Roland G70/1000/E60/BK9’s.
A good case used to be made that 76’s were rather heavier than most gigging arranger players wanted to tote, but many of us did anyway, and now the Genos weighs 4lbs less than the 61 note T4, which many gigged happily. My BK9 weighs a featherweight 20lbs, and does not compromise on the action to achieve it (no, it’s not as good as the G70’s, but easily as good as a Korg PA4x76 or Genos, albeit no aftertouch).
So Yamaha, having found a way to get a 76 to not weigh a ton, decide to restrict it to the $6k flagship alone. And, IMHO, miss a huge opportunity to expand their customer base into the market that still finds 61 too small to be effective. Let’s face it, most people can’t afford the Genos, and I think that most people that can won’t be tempted by a far less capable 76. They got the money, they want the best!
The price jump from 61 to 76 in Yamaha’s synths like the MODX+ is only about $300, so you are looking at a $2500 SX900/76, which strikes me as extremely competitive.
I wonder why, in these days of computer product design and automated production, Yamaha haven’t explored this option. They obviously ignored most of us here at SZ, who, when the T3/4 was out were EXTREMELY vocal that there was absolutely no need for a 76 Tyros! Admittedly, most of us at the time thought a 76 would add way too much weight, but I think that most Tyros users at the time would have defended the pint size keybed even if Yamaha promised to shave off 4lbs. We do tend to be creatures of habit!
At the moment, you either got $5-6k to blow, or you HAVE to buy a Korg if you want to play those amazing grand piano and Rhodes sounds with both hands.
Surely Yamaha can see the potential?
Mind you, it took them nearly 20 years to realize the potential of a 76 TOTL… Let’s hope it doesn’t take as long to fill the gap in the mid-line arranger line. A 76 SX900 would be a potent competitor to Korg…
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506408 - 09/04/22 03:49 PM
Re: The Yamaha product gap
[Re: Diki]
|
Member
Registered: 11/11/04
Posts: 708
Loc: Russia
|
PSR-EW425 has 76 keys, speakers, weights about 17 lbs (8 kg), costs about $600. I think, Yamaha tries quite hard NOT to make it professional enough, but because of competition, primarily with Casio, it comes risky close to becoming a professional instrument. Nevertheless, lack of polyphony, controls and better sounds keeps this gap existing. I think the whole line is carefully designed so that everyone would still be motivated to buy Genos, regardless of its price. While EW425 is simplified, it reveals that it's possible to create a $1000 keyboard that can be just the keyboard most of players need. The sounds and styles are now updateble, basically people could buy it and forget about buying other keyboard for 10 years. But it's not how it works today. I think, it's just vital for the economy that we would buy a lot of stuff, even if it hurts ecology and other things.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506410 - 09/05/22 12:52 PM
Re: The Yamaha product gap
[Re: Diki]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/21/02
Posts: 5520
Loc: Port Charlotte,FL,USA
|
What a balancing act it must be to bring out a new model of a MOTL and TOTL, especially when there isn't much wiggle room at the current Genos price point. The more they improve the SX900, the more pressure it puts on the Genos sales, unless they can improve the Genos at the same time with no, or little price increase.
_________________________
pa4X 76 ,SX900, Audya 76,Yamaha S970 , vArranger, Hammond SK1, Ketron SD40, Centerpoint Space Station, Bose compact
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506445 - 09/09/22 02:29 PM
Re: The Yamaha product gap
[Re: Diki]
|
Registered: 04/25/05
Posts: 14282
Loc: NW Florida
|
They likely lost some Tyros sales to the S900. Didn’t seem to bother them…
Personally, I feel some types of sounds benefit (and historically used) a lighter keybed than a piano. Organ, Clavinet, synth’s etc. were all triggered from light keybed, and many performance idiosyncrasies are very difficult and taxing on a fully weighted piano action. Palm smears, bouncing keys, all kinds of things don’t lend themselves well to the piano action no matter how good your technique.
I regularly skin my knuckles badly every time I play rock organ on an 88!
I think the SX900 with a weighted 88 underneath it is the best of all possible worlds, especially how light some modern 88’s have become while still keeping the key feel. You can probably run everything from the SX’s controls, so rest the SX on top and get the two actions really close together (like an organ!) and it should still be comfortable to play…
Modules are cool, but unless you intend to only play piano parts, or only synth parts, two controllers are still going to be needed to get the best out of them, IMHO…
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|