|
|
|
|
|
|
#72899 - 04/03/00 06:52 AM
Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Junior Member
Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 4
Loc: UK
|
Hi,
I'm thinking of buying a keyboard, but I'm very split between the Yamaha DJX and the Casio CTK-631 (both about the same price). I will be using it mainly for MIDI composition, by itself and plugged to my soundcard.
From what I read, the DJX has more controllers (like the ribbon, assign wheel) that will allow me to send, for example, modulate messages - something that the casio sadly lacks... 1-0
On the other hand, I will not be playing anything remotely dance/trance. I'm looking for a keyboard to create more progressive metal, epic/classical sounding pieces. If you know the bands Dream Theater or Rhapsody, you know what I'm aiming for. I hear that the DJX only has 1 Mb for the GM samples, which leads me to believe that the CTK-631 sounds better for these voices... 1-1
On the other hand, I might be able to salvage some of the Yamaha's sounds for what I want (cool strings and such)... 2-1
But maybe I can create soaring strings and such with the CTK631 synthetiser? 2-2
So you can see my dilema... maybe those of you that know both models can help:
a) If you wanted to do prog keyboards, stuff with strings, violins and hapsichords would you still go with the DJX (and never use any of the styles etc) or the CTK631 (and lose modulation control)?
b) Is the Casio synthetiser any good?
c) Which sequencer is better? The one on the casio or on the yamaha?
Please help... thanks a lot in advance!
------------------ -- Miguel "I have vague plans for World domination"
_________________________
Miguel Melo "I have vague plans for World domination"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72903 - 04/04/00 08:17 AM
Re: Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Junior Member
Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 4
Loc: UK
|
I have had a look at the specs for the PSR-540 and they seem to be quite good (no modulation wheel, though). Unfortunately it does appear to be way out of my intended budget. I'm mainly a guitar player (and crap at that) who wants to play around with some backing keys...
I could look at the 340, but then I lose the XG support (which would be a selling point) and still pay for the floppy drive (which I could do without, to be honest).
The budget constraint is the reason I was up for either the DJX or the Casio CTK631. I know you're all rabid Yamaha fans, but I read somewhere that they actually have improved the wave synthesis on this casio model compared with older models, and increased, for example, the amount of sample space for the piano threefold.
Can this particular casio model be that bad, or is it just lack of street credit (which I can live with, to be honest)?
And, quite honestly, is the DJX any good for anything NOT dance/trance/goa/rave?
_________________________
Miguel Melo "I have vague plans for World domination"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72906 - 04/07/00 10:06 AM
Re: Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72908 - 04/10/00 09:32 PM
Re: Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/01/99
Posts: 12800
Loc: Penn Yan, NY
|
Oooooh! DMC - Your reply was pretty nasty, as well as UN-informed! There are plenty of "REAL" music stores that carry lower priced, automatic keyboards such as the VERY popular DJX. A "REAL" music store would have to be "REAL" stupid to ignore the obvious place that a keyboard like the DJX has in the hands of a budding hip-hop artist or interactive DJ. It's not for everyone, but it sure isn't for YOU to tell them who wants one and who doesn't. And, for the record, the more mature readers can do without the swearing, OK ? A lot of people read these postings for information. Please don't bring the level down to the gutter. Musicians have a bad enough "rep" to overcome as it is. Let's keep the respect level high, and the opinions constructive. Now, for $250 bucks, what would YOU suggest for the reader?
------------------ Uncle Dave
_________________________
No longer monitoring this forum. Please visit www.daveboydmusic.com for contact info
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72914 - 04/15/00 05:50 PM
Re: Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Member
Registered: 02/20/00
Posts: 466
|
Hey Miguel! I'm from the Roland board. I saved up a whole summer to get my XP60 and it is a great board. But honestly, if the DJX would have come out the year before, I might have gotten it. Sure it lacks some features, but guess what? My Roland had Four Sliders, no knobs and no ribbon controller.
Obviously, Yamaha knew what they were doing when they put this board out. The bright colors and the low price made people skeptical, but that is honestly the best bang for the buck deal that I've seen on a keyboard for a VERY long time.
Although everything in my studio is Roland now (I'm 20, I'm not spoiled, I just really starved myself for a long time to get my gear), I am a Yamaha user since the original PSR 500M came out in 1991. The PSR540 is appealing because of the floppy, but the DJX will keep you happy for years to come. Just think about it. With the variety of sounds you get (GM + Synthy Stuff), you could take on projects out of your genre to make a few extra bucks.
I'll go now, because I've babbled a bit, but enjoy your keyboard.
The Infamous EPU.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72917 - 04/19/00 06:48 AM
Re: Yamaha DJX vs Casio CTK-631
|
Junior Member
Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 4
Loc: UK
|
Yeah, the keyboard is cool. I haven't had much time to play since I bought it (lots of DIY'ing about the house) but I fire it up and play around with the sounds everytime I have 15 mins to spare. This Easter weekend I have the in-laws over so no playing around then either... As I expected, I won't find much use for any of the styles (maybe "Digital Rock"). It really is a shame they didn't include other modern but not as dancy styles (hard rock for example), but I'm alright. I don't like using stock rythms anyway. On the other hand, I find that a lot of the DJX-specific sounds are very satisfying and readily usable on non-dance styles. It has a fair few soaring/etherial string-type sounds that are just right for progressive music, as well as metal intros and interludes. The DSP effects albeit not too dramatic for the most part, are a nice inclusion for the price, and the reverbs are cool too. I had the keyboard sending and receiving MIDI from the computer in no time at all, and it's the first time I did this. I don't know howcome many people have so much trouble with this. If I have any gripes, is that some GM sounds are a bit weak (Tremolo strings for example) or sampled too low (the pianos). Oh, and does anyone feel that the default TouchSensitivity of 3 REALLY requires you to whack the keys to get any kind of sound... Anyway, and in all honesty, I still feel I couldn't get a better controller/synth for this price. A PSR540 would be better for GM, I guess, but I would lose modulation control and it would cost me more than twice as much (way out of my budget). I'm a pretty happy camper. ------------------ Miguel Melo "I have vague plans for World domination"
_________________________
Miguel Melo "I have vague plans for World domination"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|