SYNTH ZONE
Visit The Bar For Casual Discussion
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#98889 - 11/22/03 11:22 PM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
sk880user Offline
Member

Registered: 01/26/01
Posts: 1255
Loc: United States
Quote:
Originally posted by Roel:
Hi All,

Modern Harddisk-recorders all are equiped with digital in/outs (optical and/or coaxial)
So there is no need to pass DA- and AD converters.




True. However, that does not eliminate the problem entirely.

1) One has to have a DAW with the correct digital I/O.

2) Even if one has the above, still one has to tranfer the tracks one by one. Unless you one can digitally transfer 8 tracks at the same time. Transferring stereo mix of tracks is not acceptable.

It seems to me it is both cheaper and easier to do it with a laptop.

Top
#98890 - 11/23/03 02:58 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
trtjazz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
Quote:
Originally posted by sk880user:

True. However, that does not eliminate the problem entirely.

1) One has to have a DAW with the correct digital I/O.

2) Even if one has the above, still one has to tranfer the tracks one by one. Unless you one can digitally transfer 8 tracks at the same time. Transferring stereo mix of tracks is not acceptable.

It seems to me it is both cheaper and easier to do it with a laptop.


Sk, Not really totally true here. From my AW I can burn the tracks as wav to a cd and load them into laptop in one shot. They do not need to be recorded track after track.

It really isn't any cheaper to do it on pc or lap. If one starts from scratch, then it will be more expensive to buy lap and software than one can get high quality h/d units for.

To make it as painless as possible with pc based recording to, the closer one can get to amking it a dedicated unit for music only the better off they are.
Terry


------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html
_________________________
jam on,
Terry
http://www.artisans-world.com/

Top
#98891 - 11/23/03 03:08 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
trtjazz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
Quote:
Originally posted by travlin'easy:
I've read each and every thread with great interest, and most of what I've read seems to point toward a dedicated, external recording device, one that is very expensive and still must be edited with a computer.
_____________________________________________


Gary

You don't HAVE to edit on computer, it is just easier with more options.

____________________________________________

What I would really like to see/hear is some songs A/B'd using both techniques, songs using the same keyboard, same vocal processor, same everything--except one would be recorded with an external, digital recorder, while the other would be recorded directly into the PC using either Cakewalk, Sonar, Sound Forge, GoldWave or any other PC based recording program. No editing, just straight recording--the exact same way that the song would be recorded on tape or a digital recorder. This would be the true test of which is best.

If you'd like to hear that comparison, not the same tune but done the way you suggest, i.e., one on the AW4416 alone and one done on a laptop with Adobe Audition alone... http://imjazzed.homestead.com/currentwork.html

Cut #1 Ridin' High is strictly AW4416 burned to cd, converted on pc to mp3
cut #7 Touch is Adobe Audition only on laptop
converted to mp3 straight onthe laptop and posted.


_____________________________________________

My gut feeling is that without editing, both will be about equal, but I won't know this until I hear a couple MP3's posted by those who have both recording systems available and post the A/B recordings. Then, and only then, will my aging ears be able to tell if there is truely a difference in the unedited versions.

I'm not sure one will hear a difference quality wise. Both methods turn out great recordings, they just both have different UI's and it depends like so many other things how one does and wants to work. We have to keep in mind too what would actually be a valid listening test is to put both cuts burned to a cd from both methods, because what we will hear with examples here are both that at some point had to be run through pc converted to mp to post them.

_____________________________________________

I no longer own a digital recorder, so I'm out of this one for anything other than posting songs put together on my PC. I'm working on a CD now of all Italian songs and hope to have it complete sometime early this coming week. I'll post them on my web site when they're ready.

I look forward to hearing your new cd Gary.
Terry

Cheers,

Gary


------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html



[This message has been edited by trtjazz (edited 11-23-2003).]
_________________________
jam on,
Terry
http://www.artisans-world.com/

Top
#98892 - 11/23/03 03:48 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
trtjazz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
Gary,
Once the sun comes up here, I will record a more direct comparison with the two methods, same short sequence and post them. I will let you all know when it is done so you can have a listen.

Terry

------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html
_________________________
jam on,
Terry
http://www.artisans-world.com/

Top
#98893 - 11/23/03 05:49 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
trtjazz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
Scott,
IMO if you plan to continue doing the type of work you are doing and from what I know of it....you like to set it all up in the Tyros, then one shot stereo tracks, I think you will find a dedicated hard disc recorder much more suited and far less hassle to deal with.
Terry

------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html
_________________________
jam on,
Terry
http://www.artisans-world.com/

Top
#98894 - 11/23/03 08:32 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
Tomcat Offline
Member

Registered: 11/17/03
Posts: 178
Loc: Ft Collins Colorado, USA
Very interesting topic!

What I do (and have been doing for over a year and a half) is record directly into a Korg D1600 HD multitrack recorder (approx. $1400 USD now) after I get everything recorded (two synths plus vocals) I can then add effects (both insert for each track and master for the whole thing) and then bounce to two track stereo. After that, I burn to a CDRW and transport that to my laptop as a wave file where I use Sound Forge 6 and Wavelab 4 plus a number of DirectX plugins to edit/master each song and then burn them to CD using EZ CD Creator. I personally prefer to do the mixing on the D1600 because I like to use real faders instead of virtual faders on a computer screen. The only "live" mic work I do is the vocals and I use a cardiod condenser tube mic (SP TB-1 which I love and recommend; $300 USD)so I could use Sonar but I find it to be too much head hassle. With the D1600 it's simply push record and go, period; no pain, no strain.

The new Korg HD recorders all use USB connectors on the back (no more SCSI) and have a 2 gig partition on the HD that the computer can read directly, so you can transfer wave files directly between the recorder and computer. The new units also come with a 40 gig HD and can take a larger one, up to at least 80 gig.

The only reason I see for me to ever be interested in Sonar is to record midi so that I can either fix mistakes or can change instruments to see which I like better in any given song. Or, possibly, just to learn how for learning's sake.

Tom

------------------
Bigger is not always better
_________________________
Bigger is not always better

Top
#98895 - 11/23/03 09:57 AM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
trtjazz Offline
Member

Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
For anyone interested in the results of a direct sound comparison between the two methods, have a look at the A/B comparison thread I put up.
Terry

------------------
jam on,
Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html
_________________________
jam on,
Terry
http://www.artisans-world.com/

Top
#98896 - 11/23/03 06:27 PM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
sk880user Offline
Member

Registered: 01/26/01
Posts: 1255
Loc: United States
Terry,

If they can be burn to a cd, each track individually, maybe then this is a good solution.

Top
#98897 - 11/23/03 07:36 PM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
Nigel Offline
Admin

Registered: 06/01/98
Posts: 6483
Loc: Ventura CA USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Uncle Dave:
No computer edits ..... if it needed fixing - I re did the take. There are still a few bugs that need fixin', but I'm out of time. The album needs to be delivered this Wednesday, so I'm going to live with the imperfections.


Imperfections can be a good thing. Make it too perfect and it can sound clinical or mechanical. There are imperections that obviously you should fix, but some imperfections just add character to the the music and should be left alone.

Top
#98898 - 11/23/03 07:59 PM Re: Hard Disk Recorder vs Computer
keybplayer Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 10/27/03
Posts: 2417
Loc: CA
Quote:
Originally posted by Nigel:
Imperfections can be a good thing. Make it too perfect and it can sound clinical or mechanical. There are imperections that obviously you should fix, but some imperfections just add character to the the music and should be left alone.


See, I told you my songs have some redeeming qualities to them. They abound with imperfections, albeit - they're probably the kind that should obviously be fixed though. Ha, Ha, LOL Practice! Practice! Practice! I'm workin' on it. Three years and counting... Keyboards, don't ya' just love em'..

Best regards,
Mike
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Mackie HR824 MKII Studio Monitors, Mackie 1202 VLZ Pro Mixer (made in USA), Cakewalk Sonar Platinum, Shure SM58 vocal mic.

Top
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Moderator:  Admin, Diki, Kerry 



Help keep Synth Zone Online