First of all, thanks all for your replies. (I typed a reaaally long answer but my comp crashed so let's try this again)

Dan-Sorry, I don't know why, when I checked out the Kentron, the looks didn't appeal to me, and the demos were not that great. this keyboard doesn't do it for me...sorry...

Now, here are my needs:

1. Good quality Sounds: Want something that can cover various music styles : I play Jazz/rock fusion (anything from GRP stuff, Chaka Khan, some jazz standards, pop, Rippingtons..etc..)
Tyros-I've never heard of the keyboard or played it in person, so I can't say anything much. Some have mentioned to me that the demo may be "misleading" due to some of the guitar sounds (the frets, etc..) are not necessarily playable. That's just what I was told.
Technics-Good sounds, but I've been a Technics user for 10 years+, ready for a different kinda sounds.
Triton Studio-really killer sounds (Yamaha's piano is better, not saying Triton's is bad ). BUT, I'm like this...I'll be okay with keyboards that have ALL "pretty good"sounds rather than "some good, but some are terrible..".

2. USER FRIENDLYNESS-Triton Studio fails big time. I was tinkering with the keyboard for 1 1/2 hours...trying to figure out the "cue list" or the RRPR function (to play the "pattern" or "phrase") couldn't do it. Salesperson didn't help either (He probably didn't want to make a quick $2600 sale that day). Some people said.."once you get the hang of it, it's easy to use." also, the manuals...I think it's useless.

3. EASY composer feature- meaning: I REALLY REALLY like to chop off a song into smaller chunks or phrases (or patterns whatever you wanna call it), record them individually, and store them in the ASSIGNABLE onboard buttons so I can replay them live while at the same time play my riffs/additional chords on top of them. Technics got about 16 user assignable pattern memory, which is good enough for me. (I should've put this first before the "user-friendlyness"). I usually use sequencer only to "link" those "patterns" together.

4. Edit functions: Easy to edit sounds, recorded performance.

1-2-3-4 is the most important. Now additional objectives:

5. Good effects (Korg got no problem here from what I've heard)

6. Separate outputs

7. ALL inclusive feature (CD burner is okay, although if somebody can convince me, using the USB connection and burn the CD in your computer is not too cumbersome, i might fall for the idea).

I think that's it.

Scott, thanks for the convo the last time, perhaps you wanna add more or reclarify what I'm trying to say here, so that our synthzone friends can help me better?