And in closing, how does the technology that was introduced with the Oasys translate into an Arranger Keyboard? I own the Pa2xpro. I owned then returned the Korg M3. Both of those have chipsets with Oasys lineage.
However, there are not many features of the Oasys that have propagated to the Pa2 other than maybe the fidelity of the chip and some of the soundset.
If you look at Yamaha for a second, they tend to create their sound chips for the Arranger first, then roll that technology into the workstation; IMHO. The Tyros 2 introduced Super Articulation and a sound chip that was not yet available in the Motif series. Does this mean the the Arranger product lines outsell workstations?
I would love to hear Korg's take on R&D philosophy when it comes to arrangers vs. workstations and how the two teams either play nice or not at all.
------------------
Al Giordano
http://www.arrangerworld.comKorg Pa2xpro, Roland VK8-M, DW Collectors Series Drums, Roland TD-12 Vdrums, Roland SPD-S.
Previous Topic
Index
