Did you contact the dev and ask if you could pay him to add the legacy Roland system?

You’ve got to look at it from his point of view, Ted. A) Roland are out of the arranger game, so no new players are going to get locked into Roland’s one finger system. Strike one. B) the number of Roland players incapable or unwilling to learn a new system is tiny.

Let’s be fair Ted. You are the ONLY member on this entire forum that changing their system is a problem for. Every other ex-Roland player here has either migrated or didn’t OFS in the first place. Coding ain’t easy, takes a lot of time. Time is money. Money pays the bills. If this were an issue brought up by every legacy Roland player, yes, it might be worth the time. But JUST you?

I don’t see you complaining that other discontinued OFS’s aren’t included either. Just yours. But open that door and the dev ends up spending days if not weeks coding to help a half dozen people on various discontinued brands out. Would you do that?

Look, Roland were in decline for a good decade before they finally closed shop on the pro arranger market. Everybody else that moved on learned the different system. That’s virtually 30 years ago (from the start of the decline).

I honestly think if you had spent the same time learning a new system that you have doing incredibly arcane workarounds to keep the old one (at the cost of much more gear, time and energy) you’d be happily off playing.

As I see it, complaining that a developer won’t spend much time coding something only YOU seem to care about is a bit of mere venting. Me, I’d contact the dev and ask how much to add the Roland system. Actually, me, I’d learn a new system, but if I couldn’t, I’d ask the dev what he wants to add it.

If the goal is to actually get it DONE, that is! 😂🎹
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!