A developer balances time and effort against likely return for said time and effort.

Given that here, you are the ONLY member with this particular issue, and it might be fair to extrapolate that percentage across the board, that’s not enough demand to make it worth while doing it for FREE.

Somewhere there’s a guy with a bunch of Atari sequences who would LOVE to be able to read them on an iPad. Now, if you had the skill to code that Ted, would you do it for him for free, without knowing there was anyone else that needed that? Would you do it knowing there was maybe two or three?

No. No you wouldn’t. Not in a million years!

It’s hard to understand how you don’t seem to see how solitary your problem is. How you come up with the idea that there’s hundreds if not thousands of Roland OFS system users that would flock to his product ‘if only’ he would spend days and weeks programming a fingering system that has been defunct for years beats me. Where’s ONE person here chiming in he agrees?

Crickets.

You want him to code it, PAY HIM TO CODE IT.

Apparently, you don’t want it bad enough…
_________________________
An arranger is just a tool. What matters is what you build with it..!