|
|
|
|
|
|
#101360 - 02/10/04 08:37 PM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Member
Registered: 08/01/02
Posts: 2683
|
Originally posted by keybplayer: Boo, Hard Disk recorders are fine but I wouldn't give up on Soft Synth recorders so quickly. Cakewalk in particular has a very crowded User interface IMO and trying to find your way around its many features can be daunting as you have found out. There are other Software based recorders or multi-track recorders that you may find easier to use. You should be able to download Demo versions of other Soft Synths like Cakewalk and try them out to see which one[s] suit you best. I can tell you first hand that Sound Forge has an extremely easy to use interface and everything is laid out very logically and its very uncluttered. If you need a Multi-track recorder - (Sound Forge is simply a 2 track "Stereo or Mono" recorder) - then you may want to consider Sony Vegas 4.0. 4.0 is the newest version, Sony having acquired it and all other Sonic Foundry software programs when Sony bought them out. Vegas is a multi-track recorder albeit a rather expensive one.
There is so much you can do with a Soft Synth recorder or Soft Synth Multi-track recorder that you can't do with a Hard Disk recorder. There are enormous amounts of Tools and Editing options on a software based program that Hard Disk recorders can't touch. You just need to find the program that is to your liking and has an easy to use and navigate interface. If you do decide to go hardware based there are many fine options to fit your needs though.
Best regards, Mike Mike, Software sequencers are sequencers, not soft synths. Soft synths are instruments in the form of software. I disagree that you can do SO much more than with h/d's. I have the Tascam and Sonar, Sound Forge, Adobe, Acid, Power Tracks and a few others. It really depends on which h/d recorder someone buys. There is no doubt in my mind having run the soft seq's and h/d's for a long time, the h/d's are far more user friendly then even the simplest of software. Certainly far less hassle as well. One plugs their inputs in and pushes record....done deal. No software is that easy, by the time one interfaces up and drivers, and things running in the backround that interfere with analog recording. My Tascam has 128 track midi recording as well, but therein is what usually seperates h/d's from softwares, recording midi. Terry ------------------ jam on, Terry http://imjazzed.homestead.com/Index.html [This message has been edited by trtjazz (edited 02-10-2004).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101361 - 02/10/04 09:08 PM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/08/00
Posts: 4715
Loc: West Virginia
|
After speaking with boo and getting a better understanding about what he wants to do, I'd have to say that a digital recorder is really what Boo is looking for. It seems to me that he wants something that has a lot of hands on control and functions that are controlled by panel knobs or easily accessed through a menu.. He also doesn't want to bust his wallet on this one. Personally I think the Zoom MRS-4 would work great for what he wants to do, and if he could afford it the Fostex MR8 would be a great choice for him as well. He could still burn CD's with either unit.. He just has to get the appropriate hardware and software which is fairly inexpensive.
Squeak
_________________________
GEAR: Yamaha MOXF-6, Casio MZX-500, Roland Juno-Di, M-Audio Venom, Roland RS-70, Yamaha PSR S700, M-Audio Axiom Pro-61 (Midi Controller). SOFTWARE: Mixcraft-7, PowerTracks Pro Audio 2013, Beat Thang Virtual, Dimension Le.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101365 - 02/10/04 11:40 PM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/27/03
Posts: 2417
Loc: CA
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by trtjazz: [B] >>I disagree that you can do SO much more than with h/d's. I have the Tascam and Sonar, Sound Forge, Adobe, Acid, Power Tracks and a few others. It really depends on which h/d recorder someone buys. "Terry, I'm talking about the Tools and Editing abilities in Sofware Sequencers. Sure, it may be simple to lay down tracks in a h/d recorder but what then? Can you edit the the .wav file to your hearts content if need be like you can with a good Soft Sequencer? Am I missing something here? And that $3,000 Tascam is 10 times the cost of Sound Forge and over 4 times the cost of Vegas 4.0 yet they essentially do the same thing except the Midi plus they have the added benefit of all the advanced file Editing Options and Tools, etc." >>There is no doubt in my mind having run the soft seq's and h/d's for a long time, the h/d's are far more user friendly then even the simplest of software. Certainly far less hassle as well. One plugs their inputs in and pushes record....done deal. No software is that easy, by the time one interfaces up and drivers, and things running in the backround that interfere with analog recording. "I agree that if one wants to run Software Sequencers first off they will need to have a good fast Computer plus if at all possible to run Windows XP as the OS. But if your computer is up to snuff and you have all the required gear to get you set up, then Soft Sequencers are a dream come true IMO and definitely a must have for advanced file editing possibilities, etc., etc." After you get the hang of Software Recorders and Multi-track recorders like Sound Forge and Vegas, etc., then it really is a breeze to record to. Dare I say, as easy as your Tascam is. >>My Tascam has 128 track midi recording as well, but therein is what usually seperates h/d's from softwares, recording midi. I use my Tyros' internal Sequencer for recording Midi. With 16 tracks available I can sound like a whole Orchestra or even a Big Band. I do want to start delving into Midi Software Sequencers like Cakewalk and I even have an earlier version of Cakewalk (6.0). Now, finding the time to do it is another story. But as the old addage goes - You have to make the time (referring to me). Best regards, Mike
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Mackie HR824 MKII Studio Monitors, Mackie 1202 VLZ Pro Mixer (made in USA), Cakewalk Sonar Platinum, Shure SM58 vocal mic.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101368 - 02/11/04 12:59 AM
Re: Who uses a stand-alone digital recorder
|
Senior Member
Registered: 10/27/03
Posts: 2417
Loc: CA
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by brickboo: [B]Mike, May be my computer isn't up to snuff? I never thought of that. I have the 533 MHz Celeron,15GHD, 256SyncDRAM, 128 KB L2Cache 66MHz system bus. What do you think? thanks for all the help, Boo Boo, I think you need a faster computer. Celeron chips are Intels econo line. Much like Chevy is GM's econo line. You need a much faster chip too. I wouldn't settle for anything less than a Pentium 4. You can get a slower P4 for pretty cheap. But with that P4 you will need a motherboard that supports the P4 chipset. I would also get a speedy Hard Drive Boo. I'm guessing the one you have now is probably a slow poke older 5,400 RPM drive although I could be mistaken of course. Also you should think about at least doubling your RAM to 512 MB. If your not into getting your hands dirty opening up the computer and installing the stuff yourself you can always take it to a reputable Computer Service Center and have them do it. Or if you know of a person or relative that could do it, then that would be even better cause you could save some bucks. My advice is if you decide to upgrade your computer make sure you diligently check out and research the products you intend to get. For instance; when looking for a new motherboard check out different online Hardware Sites that will give you the skinny on different motherboard brands and models and give you reviews of them so you can determine which is the best one for price/performance, etc. A good site to check out motherboards, hard drives, RAM, CPU's, etc., is Tom's Hardware Best regards, Mike
_________________________
Yamaha Genos, Mackie HR824 MKII Studio Monitors, Mackie 1202 VLZ Pro Mixer (made in USA), Cakewalk Sonar Platinum, Shure SM58 vocal mic.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|