Mike:
Yes, I'm very happy with the audio fidelity & performance of the EvSxa100's. In fact, though I'm very impressed with the Mackie 450's sound, I tend to agree with Donny Pesce (sorry Uncle Dave) that the Mackie 450's sound a tad bit hyped for my music taste (especially for intimate exposed bass drums piano, vocals stuff lounge material). My only complaint about the EV SxA100's is the hiss heard when up close when the room is quiet. It's apparently built into the internal amp system because it doesn't change in volume even if the audio input cords are removed. For high quality pro souding live 'one man band' gig performance where portablility is important, the EVs fit the bill. If portability wasn't an issue, I'd obviously opt for the Mackie 450s.
For at home studio playing/recording, I prefer going thru my Genelec 1029A Near field Monitors w/ 1091A sub woofer.
http://www.genelec.com/products/1029a/1029a.htm They produce the most accurate sound but you need to stay in close proximity to the speakers (sweet zone) to obtain optimum sound.
Re: Yamaha 9000pro - Yeah, I was drooling over this board at NAMM last year. The only problem (for me) is its' weight and awkward size. If they would have moved the pitch bend controler from the left side to above the keys in order to shorten the length of the board, I probably would have purchased it. Though the PSR2000 doesn't have all the features of the 9000pro (hard drive, multiple registration banks, MFC10 foot controller pedal support, and a few additional sounds including a terrific 'live' piano sample), I'm still VERY happy with the PSR2000, because it has almost all other features/sounds of the 9000pro, but in a MUCH smaller/lighter package (24 lbs vs 49 lbs) and is less than 1/2 the price. Btw, ALL the 9000pro's styles are readily available for FREE on the internet for download into the PSR2000. They sound the same on both the 9000 & 2000. If price is not a consideration and you don't plan to move it very often, then the 9000pro would probably be the best choice. As far as GEM's new keyboard offering, we have yet to see. So far I'm a little skeptical, but we could all be in for a surprise at NAMM. Mike, if trad jazz (as you have noted in the past) is your fav playing style and you want more chord voicing recognition (including rootless) & playing style options, then GEM may not be the way to go. But who knows, we could be in for a surprise there too. I'll keep you posted. Re: Technics KN6500. I still think that Technics has the BEST chord recognition (full keyboard mode) for a jazz keyboard player. Even the Yamaha & Ketron-Solton SD1 cannot come close to Technics excellent chord recognition when playing in 'full keyboard' mode. In fact I've decided NOT to sell my KN5000 (yet) because I really need this when I REALLY want to 'get down' and play in a jazz piano style with both hands over the entire keyboard, while successfully triggering the correct accompaniment harmonies. If traditional jazz style keyboard (piano) playing is your thing, I think I would recommend the Technics KN6500, even though I think Technics has an over inflated pricing structure (at least here in the US). I'm keeping my eyes on Technics next model (KN7000) which may not arrive till the end of the year. Until then, I'm continuing to enjoy the Yamaha PSR2000.
Denny: the Yamaha MS400s are definitely another great sounding 'no hiss' amp. Great to hear they're working out for you. I just didn't consider them because they weigh the about the same as the Mackie 450s (53 lbs).
- Scott
Hey Donny: I just noticed that your original posting comment on this thread re: the Mackie 450's sound have been deleted ! I hope it wasn't Uncle Dave's comment that convinced you to remove it
[This message has been edited by Scottyee (edited 01-09-2002).]