|
|
|
|
|
|
#113175 - 12/23/03 10:36 PM
Re: PA1xPro ... My 2cents
|
Senior Member
Registered: 06/09/02
Posts: 3163
Loc: Pensacola, Florida, USA
|
I will be interested to check this out myself.
From prior experience, though, this is what I feel to be the case. The Korg PA80 online demo in this example, sounded sooooo good I had to have one. The only question I had was, can I sound like that playing live or is this a fancey studio sequence?
The PA60/80 never came close to sounding like the online demo. In my opinion and that of everyone else who heard the two side by side, very subjective of course, the concensus was my PSR2000 sounded much better.Sorry Korg lovers, I know everybody has a different taste and ear. I think Korg is for more modern music, more sythesizer sounds. I prefer standards with the old rich non-synthesizer sound.
As far as Yamaha online factory demos for the PSR2000 and Tyros, I feel that what you hear is about the same in person and in fact can be played live.
The moral of the story of course: try them out hands on preferably with your own speakers, and a 30 - 45 day trial period is the ideal way.
My slant on it.
[This message has been edited by Scott Langholff (edited 12-23-2003).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113176 - 12/24/03 10:34 PM
Re: PA1xPro ... My 2cents
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/04/01
Posts: 2071
Loc: Fruita, Colorado, USA
|
I don't think anyone will ever make an electronic sound for a sax that will please me.
I hear trumpet sounds that are surprising, trombones, guitars, pianos, strings, etc., etc., but sax sounds suck on everything I've heard so far. I haven't heard the tyros yet, but I bet that won't please me either. Forget the sax on arrangers. They all sound phoney.
All arrangers are amazing in my opinion. Some are better for folks for different reasons. For me it sequencing. Everything else is secondary.
I've come to realize that one should not buy any arranger because of what someone else thinks about it. Opinions are just a starting point.
Everyone needs to figure out what they need and try the different arrangers available and go from there. That's what DonM, Donny, Dave, Scott and others have been saying and it's true.
_________________________
I'm not prejudiced, I hate everybody!! Ha ha! My Sister-In-Law had this tee shirt. She was a riot!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113181 - 12/27/03 02:08 PM
Re: PA1xPro ... My 2cents
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2195
Loc: Catskill Mountains, NY
|
I happen to think that the PA80 demos sounded exactly like the board does. I can easily identify each style used in the demo and recreate the voices used to play along wity no problem. That probably is the result of using the board for quite a while and knowing it inside and out.
The PA80 cetainly isn't flawless, but for me it was the best choice of what was out there at the time ( considering only arrangers ). Sounds being subjective as we often note here, for my bread and butter sounds and styles, the PA80 was the among the best in it's class. The Tyros has changed my opinion about the Yamaha soundset and styles though, and I could be comfortable using it as well.
I think I'll probably wait until the PSR3000 comes out and then demo it vs the PA1x speaker version if it's also out at that time. if it rivals the Tyros in sounds and styles, then the PSR3000 really only needs a better feeling keyboard for me to seriouslly consider it, but I'm very curious about the PA1x as well. If it offers a noticeable improvement over the PA80, and I like the 3000's key feel, then the choice becomes more difficult for me.
Actually, I can envision both being in a future lineup for me.
_________________________
AJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|