Hi Gary
I think your recordings came across rather well.
You mention an interesting point regarding the bit rate of the recording and the download time that I pondered for a quite a while.
I decided that if someone was actually interested enough to listen to my demos and they had a slow computer, that they would wait for a slightly longer download if needed.
I noticed a rather major difference between the quality of a low vs a higher bit rate in sound. I also heard some of my demos on another musicians computer/speaker system. His speaker system was not that great, it needed all the help it could get. I felt that to me it was more important to let people get as high a quality of sound as possible when listening to my variety of songs mostly because a lot of people don't even know that one person can sound like that and wanted as rich a sound as I reasonably could get. That's also the reason most of my demos are short having the few full length tunes marked with an asterisk.
I did find that to get the very best sound I first recorded at the higher rates of 24/48 and 24/96. Then without any editing I lowered it down to 16 bits. That alone did make a noticeable difference in the tone quality as it allowed more data to be included after I lowered it to 16 rather than just recording at 16.
I also noticed that most online demos that I heard that also sounded good to me were done at least at 192 k-bits for the mp3. I decided to go up one notch higher to make it a little better and not really affect the download time.
Just my current slant on it for my purposes.
Anyway, thanx for sharing your efforts with us.
Best
Scott
http://www.ScottLMusic.com [This message has been edited by Scott Langholff (edited 06-28-2005).]