My brother is a white hot musician and semi pro producer . he said the following about the Korg board
"Hmm. To me the demo "Love Embraces All" sounds promising anyway, but the
bit that freaked me out (as well as the price), was when I read an (unofficial) review of it from a bystander. He said that there were STILL some acoustic sounds that werent replicated well (!). And to think that this is coming from an 8000+ keyboard?!
Another thing was its sampling memory - in order to maximise it, you have to sacrifice any expansion boards you may have in the nit . (Yes, you've heard
it - EXPANSION BOARDS!). Two issues are at work here - memory can be
"expanded" to 512MB (The Fantom could do this without removing the boards,
and for an instrument at this price you would expect it to be expanded to a
higher capacity), and the fact that expansion boards ARE ALREADY MADE for
such an expensive instrument.
I personally think Korg have shot themselves in the foot by manufacturing
this, and aiming it at a specific market. In saying that though, I didn't
know such a market exists - Most producers would spend that amount of money
on fitting a whole studio (with their choice of selected gear), let alone
spend it on just a keyboard.
This is significant as even though the OASYS was an expensive kit to
produce, the technology itself was based on the soundcard of the same name
that they made earlier (which was also expensive to produce). That was
originally retailing for 2000, but got phased out because when Windows XP
came out, Korg didn't write any drivers for it making it incompatible with
newer computers.
Sounds like the beginning of the end for Korg if this thing becomes a sales
flop."
It looks like Korg messed up and needed a platform to extend the life of the OASYS software hence the new keyboard which is essentially an amalgamation of old technology within an "open system"
What do you think ?