Well, I wouldn't say the new Rolands didn't raise any excitement
But unfortunately, it was mostly in the form of Yammie lovers trashing them and Roland lovers defending them..........!
I keep trying to start threads about how we can discuss fundamental improvements in arranger usage and technology (Chord sequencers, better fill control, etc.), but most seem to be more concerned whether the investment in their current arranger was justified, and usually, the only way they feel better about it is by denigrating others' choices.
These things are tools to make music with, not our children, and as such they should be able to be criticized in a non-partisan mode. If we can't work out a way to improve them, why should the big manufacturers try any harder.
We may be all relegated to incremental improvements in our arrangers, if we can't come up with ways that WE would like them improved, but getting widespread discussion on them seems like pulling teeth. I guess it's just easier to be destructive than constructive........